slowmutant wrote:
monty wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
The narrator of this video has misunderstood and misrepresented all of his talking-points.
I take it as a spoof of political ads in general, and Republicanism and McCain in particular. Don't you think that those charges would be leveled against Jesus or anyone who preached the Sermon on the Mount today if they ran for political office? Are the poor too blessed to get off their asses and get a job? Why should good, hardworking Americans be taxed to support those who made bad decisions? What's with this nonsense about people selling all they have and giving the money to the poor? The vicious attacks against the rich, claiming that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a wealthy person to enter the kingdom of heaven? That sounds like 60's style communism to me! That is not change we can believe in!!
Vicious attacks against the rich, huh? By who? And you assume that poverty is a result of character flaw? You piece of vomit ...
Just repeating what I hear every day from Republican co-workers and neighbors. It wasn't my opinion, and given the complex irony, I understand your anger at my statements. So let me turn off all irony and sarcasm, and hear me out.
Below is a link to one of the most comprehensive surveys on American's attitudes towards poverty. If you read through it, you will find that 63% of Republicans believe that people are poor because they did not do enough for themselves; by contrast, a majority of Democrats (57%) attribute poverty to circumstances - ie, being born into poverty, or experiencing unfortunate events. There are also big gaps between the parties in terms of whether tax money should go to helping the poor - most Republicans believe that poverty cannot be solved, so there is little reason for government to try. Other research has shown that conservatives tend to be more comfortable with inequity and injustice - they accept it as a fact of life.
People on both sides agree that drug abuse and mental health issues contribute to poverty - in fact, the poor themselves are more likely to cite this as a main cause. But one party is more likely to favor rehabilitation and health services for drug and mental problems, while the other party is more likely to favor jail as a 'solution' to substance abuse, and they don't seem to care that a person with a criminal conviction has an even harder time getting a job and getting back on their feet.
I will say that neither main political party is an attempt to implement the Sermon on the Mount, but that the Republicans have much more hostility to those ideas. Republicanism and conservatism and libertarianism are much more about rugged individualism and making it against the odds, and not taxing those who are economically successful to help the poor. The Democrats are more likely to favor those ideas.
There are problems with being too generous with social programs - as an unintended consequence, it can foster a culture of welfare dependency, as Republicans (and some Democrats) have pointed out. I think social programs should be evaluated and adjusted - if something doesn't work or makes things worse, change tactics. But I would rather have a government that aspires to the ideas of Jesus and Gandhi - even if they cannot solve all the problems, they should try. I favor a hand-up over a hand-out, but I think that sometimes both are needed.
http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/poll/poverty/