Page 2 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Magnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,372
Location: Claremont, California

17 Dec 2008, 10:00 pm

Have you heard of Pythagorean Theology?

http://www.cs.utk.edu/~mclennan/BA/ETP/I.html


_________________
As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other.

-Pythagoras


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

17 Dec 2008, 10:16 pm

Math & science, what little I know of them, don't damage my faith at all. If anything, they strengthen my faith in God. The insights of math & science demonstrate a thoroughly ordered, obviously created universe. Order and Randomness, I think, are perceptions. It all seems to depend on the magnifying power of the microscope, Order and Randomness. Order implies purpose. Purpose implies intelligence. Try to imagine a Purpose that pervades every layer and strata of the Infinite Universe. That is what many call God.

At certain magnifications, everything seems random.

But at other magnifications, order is self-evident.

How thin a slice of the Infinite Universe is human science actually privy to?



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

18 Dec 2008, 2:51 am

your topics headline isnt news


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

18 Dec 2008, 12:49 pm

slowmutant wrote:
The insights of math & science demonstrate a thoroughly ordered, obviously created universe.


Just because something is ordered does not mean it was created by an intelligence.

The laws of the universe seem to make "beautiful sense" because it is OUR universe. If the laws were different we would think those laws were "thoroughly ordered" and proof of God because those were the laws under which we evolved and we would be having this discussion by waving our 16 tentacles in a peculiar fashion while looking up at the purple sun and pink sky.


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

18 Dec 2008, 1:32 pm

Existence itself (in the form of space-time) cannot just spontaneously come into... well... existence... That's just a recursive process that would make everything go to s**t if it were true...

As it stands, sure Newton discovered the first laws of physics, but who invented them?



Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

18 Dec 2008, 1:41 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
Existence itself (in the form of space-time) cannot just spontaneously come into... well... existence... That's just a recursive process that would make everything go to s**t if it were true...

As it stands, sure Newton discovered the first laws of physics, but who invented them?


Ok so if we assume that existence cannot simply spring from nothing (a conclusion you have no evidence for except "I don't understand how it would work") then it would logically follow that some other force caused it to happen. Does that mean that force was intelligent or sentient? Not at all.

As for who invented physics that's like asking who invented the way the pile of clothes on my bedroom floor lay. No one did that's just the way things turned out.


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

18 Dec 2008, 1:55 pm

Fraya wrote:
Ok so if we assume that existence cannot simply spring from nothing (a conclusion you have no evidence for except "I don't understand how it would work") then it would logically follow that some other force caused it to happen. Does that mean that force was intelligent or sentient? Not at all.

Did logic exist before the Big Bang?



Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

18 Dec 2008, 2:21 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
Did logic exist before the Big Bang?


/facepalm

Probably not or at least the laws of physics we have now most likely didn't apply which is why I said we were assuming you were right. For all we know the universe simply poofing into existence without anyone or anything causing it to might have been normal under the laws that governed whatever came before it. Our brains are keyed to function and think under the laws that we evolved under so we are most likely unable to comprehend what things were like or what happened just before the big bang. That being said applying our logic to say "Something had to cause the creation of the universe and it had to be something really powerful so praise Jeebus" is taking a boatload of assumptions, subjective observations, and the arrogant assumption our logic applied back then to absurd extremes.


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

22 Dec 2008, 4:57 pm

Fraya wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
The insights of math & science demonstrate a thoroughly ordered, obviously created universe.


Just because something is ordered does not mean it was created by an intelligence.

The laws of the universe seem to make "beautiful sense" because it is OUR universe. If the laws were different we would think those laws were "thoroughly ordered" and proof of God because those were the laws under which we evolved and we would be having this discussion by waving our 16 tentacles in a peculiar fashion while looking up at the purple sun and pink sky.


Order implies intelligence. Order implies purpose.

Ordered things, especially if they are intricately ordered, suggest an ordering intelligence.

But a belief in a supreme intelligence or Creator, that speaks to perception and choice. I choose to see things a certain way, I guess.



Phagocyte
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,757

22 Dec 2008, 5:20 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Math & science, what little I know of them, don't damage my faith at all. If anything, they strengthen my faith in God. The insights of math & science demonstrate a thoroughly ordered, obviously created universe. Order and Randomness, I think, are perceptions. It all seems to depend on the magnifying power of the microscope, Order and Randomness. Order implies purpose. Purpose implies intelligence. Try to imagine a Purpose that pervades every layer and strata of the Infinite Universe. That is what many call God.

At certain magnifications, everything seems random.

But at other magnifications, order is self-evident.

How thin a slice of the Infinite Universe is human science actually privy to?


This is well-said. I understand where you're coming from.


_________________
Un-ban Chever! Viva La Revolucion!


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

22 Dec 2008, 5:36 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Order implies intelligence. Order implies purpose



wrong and wrong again.


if an atom can only stay stable with a certain weight and certain pull and attraction, then the order simply is the only way it can exist. no intelligence needed: it wouldn't exist if not ordered correctly.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

22 Dec 2008, 6:44 pm

Fraya wrote:
ToadOfSteel wrote:
Existence itself (in the form of space-time) cannot just spontaneously come into... well... existence... That's just a recursive process that would make everything go to s**t if it were true...

As it stands, sure Newton discovered the first laws of physics, but who invented them?


Ok so if we assume that existence cannot simply spring from nothing (a conclusion you have no evidence for except "I don't understand how it would work") then it would logically follow that some other force caused it to happen. Does that mean that force was intelligent or sentient? Not at all.

As for who invented physics that's like asking who invented the way the pile of clothes on my bedroom floor lay. No one did that's just the way things turned out.


Fraya, if you had a shred of intellectual honesty you would admit that you do not know how things came into being. I Don't Know are the three words people like you cannot seem to say.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Jan 2009, 10:14 pm

claire333 wrote:
The only glitch with superstring and M theory is they are based on a 10 and 11 dimensional construct. We are three dimensional beings, unable to ever see in 10 or 11 dimensions. If mathematics proves them to be true, we will still never be able to truly see it for ourselves. One might as well believe in God.


We can't see atoms. But there is very strong evidence for them. Causes can be established without direct unaided perception.

ruveyn