Atheists: Is stealing wrong? If so, explain why.

Page 2 of 13 [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

25 Dec 2008, 10:29 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
As Christians, I think we are allowed to defend ourselves and our property. There's nothing wrong with seeking justice for ourselves, is there?

Just my $.02


But this is not a religious issue


You're right. It's a morality issue.



pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,015

26 Dec 2008, 12:42 am

and all this time I thought 'property is theft'...;)



falcorn
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 89

26 Dec 2008, 1:39 am

i think it depends on who you steal from, if you steal from a rich person and you are poor i dont think its wrong, but if the opposite happens i think its wrong



NocturnalQuilter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 937

26 Dec 2008, 2:23 am

I think most people would steal from whomever if they knew they wouldn't get caught or punished for it. I don't think it's an issue of morality any more than an issue of religious conviction- I think it's an issue of entitlement.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

26 Dec 2008, 3:06 am

Property regulations are a necessary part of communal living. If violation of property is condoned then the whole system of value and interpersonal trust breaks down. The current financial breakdown in the USA is basically because the banking system sold worthless paper as being valuable and it is a form of theft when that value is no longer honored. Theft as an adjustment to unfair distribution of necessary goods and services destroys civilization but has nothing to do with religion. The wealthy end of society is particularly adamant in property rights because they have so much to lose but the fair distribution of wealth in an economic system is frequently frustrated by an over emphasis on private property rights.



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

26 Dec 2008, 3:13 am

It's only wrong if it wasn't pinched from Ragtime's appartment.

Ragtime has some nice stuff in there.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

26 Dec 2008, 5:01 am

NocturnalQuilter wrote:
I think most people would steal from whomever if they knew they wouldn't get caught or punished for it. I don't think it's an issue of morality any more than an issue of religious conviction- I think it's an issue of entitlement.


Entitlements cause people to steal?



-JR
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 650
Location: Somewhere in Time

26 Dec 2008, 5:11 am

^Yeah, went "what the hell?" on that too, but figured the problem was on my end.

It's funny seeing religious belief being equated as the default setting for "morality." If anything, religious belief stymies the moral choice by having to think what "God" would want, or by being "led" by people who claim to know God, but have wholly different thoughts on morality in their own minds. God tells Moses to hand down the order for all of us to keep from killing another, and yet also orders Moses to kill whoever wasn't on his "side." Isn't this darn confusing? The prospect of being moral is easy without having to worry about God.


_________________
Still grateful.
"...do you really think you're in control...?"
Diagnosis: uncertain.


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

26 Dec 2008, 5:18 am

Everybody's morals must come from somewhere, right? Most of what I know about right/wrong good/bad I learned from my parents. If they hadn't instilled in me what is essentially their morality, how would I know anything? My own sense of ethics, morality, justice, right vs. wrong, that came from a very earthly source: Mom & Dad.

I wasn't born religious, althoiugh I was born into the Catholic fold.



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

26 Dec 2008, 5:19 am

When ragtime goes to sleep tonight, I'm going to break into his house and raid his refrigerator. :twisted:



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

26 Dec 2008, 6:10 am

anna-banana wrote:
let me answer your question with a short summary of the tale Rashomon (in case you haven't read it):

Wikipedia wrote:
The man, a lowly servant recently fired, is contemplating whether to starve to death or to become a thief to survive in the barren times. When he goes upstairs - after noticing some firelight there, he encounters a woman, who is stealing hair from the dead bodies in the second floor. He is disgusted, and decides then that he would rather take the path of righteousness even if it meant starvation. He is furious with the woman.

But the old woman tells him that she steals hair to make wigs so she can survive. In addition, the woman whose body she is currently robbing cheated people in her life by selling snake meat and claiming it was fish. The old woman says that this was not wrong because it allowed the woman to survive -- and so in turn this entitles her to steal from the dead person, because if she doesn't, she too will starve. The man responds "You won't blame me, then, for taking your clothes. That's what I have to do to keep from starving to death." He then brutally robs the woman of her robe and disappears into the night.


I guess no further comment needed :wink:


i am sorry but i have not the wits to keep up with the mentage in this thread.

how can one steal from a dead person?
does the dead person wish for the maggots instead to benefit from what otherwise could be devoted to a humans survival? the dead person can surely not retain ownership of anything.
the dead persons family has taken all the valuables from the dead persons house, and then the undertaker gets some nourishment, and then when the casket is lowered, the bacterial world are the beneficiaries.
are bacteria theives? or are they opportunists?
what use do the dead ladies have for their hair?


Quote:
I think most people would steal from whomever if they knew they wouldn't get caught or punished for it. I don't think it's an issue of morality any more than an issue of religious conviction- I think it's an issue of entitlement.


do you include yourself in that?
that is not my way of being.

an example may be a little old lady who has her late husbands superannuation payout in cash sitting for all to see in a trolley as she waddles home with it.
would you take any of it, even though she seems to have alzheimers and would never report it?

i hope not.

what about a baby who has a wallet in it's pram that it's mother left while she is elsewhere.
would you take the wallet from the baby?

even from a bank who is insanely rich and would never notice the loss, i would not steal.

i think that to rely on ill begotten gains for the nuturance of your life is feeble and flimsey.

if you (generic) can not live with the genetics you have, then just lay down and succumb. it is a shady world where people bite into and suck up other peoples hard work and fortune.

parasites are biological "drains" in a sense.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

26 Dec 2008, 6:52 am

Agreed, agreed, and agreed.



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

26 Dec 2008, 7:23 am

b9 wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
let me answer your question with a short summary of the tale Rashomon (in case you haven't read it):

Wikipedia wrote:
The man, a lowly servant recently fired, is contemplating whether to starve to death or to become a thief to survive in the barren times. When he goes upstairs - after noticing some firelight there, he encounters a woman, who is stealing hair from the dead bodies in the second floor. He is disgusted, and decides then that he would rather take the path of righteousness even if it meant starvation. He is furious with the woman.

But the old woman tells him that she steals hair to make wigs so she can survive. In addition, the woman whose body she is currently robbing cheated people in her life by selling snake meat and claiming it was fish. The old woman says that this was not wrong because it allowed the woman to survive -- and so in turn this entitles her to steal from the dead person, because if she doesn't, she too will starve. The man responds "You won't blame me, then, for taking your clothes. That's what I have to do to keep from starving to death." He then brutally robs the woman of her robe and disappears into the night.


I guess no further comment needed :wink:


i am sorry but i have not the wits to keep up with the mentage in this thread.

how can one steal from a dead person?
does the dead person wish for the maggots instead to benefit from what otherwise could be devoted to a humans survival? the dead person can surely not retain ownership of anything.
the dead persons family has taken all the valuables from the dead persons house, and then the undertaker gets some nourishment, and then when the casket is lowered, the bacterial world are the beneficiaries.
are bacteria theives? or are they opportunists?
what use do the dead ladies have for their hair?


it's just a story to illustrate the point, which is- if everyone would steal from others there only would be chaos and, as someone said before, there would be no society.

so it's not a religious issue, it doesn't stem from spirituality or even morality, but from the fact that homo sapiens are social beings and stealing goes against social.

edited to add: I can agree with you when it comes to stealing from the dead, but that's not an issue here, it was only a part of the story which was a hyperbole anyway, and only to make a point.


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

26 Dec 2008, 7:45 am

Ragtime, I deeply resent your concept that it takes a belief in God in order to live a "moral" life. Perhaps that's true for those ignorant souls who never learned to think for themselves, but not for the rest of us. You can keep your "religion" if you choose, but don't think that it makes you a better person than anybody else.


_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

26 Dec 2008, 8:02 am

slowmutant wrote:
As Christians, I think we are allowed to defend ourselves and our property. There's nothing wrong with seeking justice for ourselves, is there?

Just my $.02


Not if you're really a Christian.

Luke 6:27-30:
Quote:
"Love your enemies, do good to those that hate you, bless those who curse you, and pray for those who mistreat you. If anyone hits you on one cheek, let him hit you on the other one too; if someone takes your coat, let him have your shirt as well. Give to everyone who asks you for something, and when someone takes what is yours, do not ask for it back."


Luke 6:35:
Quote:
"Love your enemies and do good to them. lend and expect nothing back."


Matthew 5:39-42:
Quote:
"If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, let him slap you on the left cheek, too. And if someone takes you to court to sue you for your shirt, let him have your coat as well. And if one of the occupation troops forces you to carry his pack one mile, carry it two miles. When someone asks you for something, give it too him."


If you protect yourself or your property, or seek justice for yourself, then you are no longer a Christian.



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

26 Dec 2008, 8:05 am

ed wrote:
Ragtime, I deeply resent your concept that it takes a belief in God in order to live a "moral" life. Perhaps that's true for those ignorant souls who never learned to think for themselves, but not for the rest of us. You can keep your "religion" if you choose, but don't think that it makes you a better person than anybody else.


A-men!


_________________
not a bug - a feature.