Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Why is Sarah Palin so disliked?

Page 11 of 18 [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 18  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

29 Sep 2011, 2:14 am

Once again 'Yasha chastises us for not living down to his straw-man ideal...
:roll:



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

29 Sep 2011, 7:15 am

LKL wrote:
Once again 'Yasha chastises us for not living down to his straw-man ideal...
:roll:


There is not a lot of deep thinking or self-reflection going on in some parts of the right.
They seem it hold every view as axiomatic. (It frees the brain up from using logic).


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

29 Sep 2011, 11:55 am

Also, a lot of people do not respect Mrs. Palin due to her personal immorality.



Abgal64
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

29 Sep 2011, 2:21 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Abgal64 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Abgal64 wrote:
First, let us look at the core terms in modern world politics:

"Liberals" are people who want liberty, freedom and choice. True liberals are generally for the free market, or at least some form of market economy, as it allows individual economic choice and freedom. They also are for Democracy, especially liberal democracy (as opposed to the illiberal democracy in a few states such as Singapore.) Thus, a true liberal is one who values freedom and individual choice over all.


Hate to break it to you, but Liberals are not pro-democracy, they are not pro-free market, and are not for people having rights. Maybe they were once but they quite frankly aren't anymore.
I am not pro-democracy, being for a meritocracy, nor am I pro-free market, being for a centrally-planned economy. I am for "rights" but not in the way that true liberals are: They want rights to be free from things whereas I, being pro-authoritative government (not authoritarian, but authoritative) as exemplified best by Singapore in contemporary times and historically probably best by mid-Imperial China (when compared to contemporary states), want guarantees for things: I want rights to housing, a job, education and food, for example, as opposed to rights to bare arms and have privateschooling and homeschooling. This is why I am not a liberal, nor a Democrat (I vote for with the Socialist Party, and my canidate of choice is the doomed but righteous Stewart Alexander; he is not perfect but honest, thoughtful, assertive and far better than Obama, Perry, Palin or Romney.)

Also, you see to be confusing may use of the term "liberal" with the mainstream American media's use of the term: I am using it in the sense of Classical liberals, not politically correct, slightly forward thinking mixed and moderated weak progressive, moderate liberal, moderate conservatives as you seem to be.


Stewart Alexander may be better than President Obama. However, the Evango-Fascists are a far worse choice. The way our electoral system works, it is unthinkable not to support President Obama against the vile forces of evil.


Jabba the Hutt would be a better President than Obama, at least Jabba could run something effectively.
Using that logic, I suppose Josef Mengele, colloquially known as the Angel of Death, a Nazi war criminal, would be an excellent president: He certainly knew how to run something, that something being Block 10, a block where human experimentation was practiced on Auschwitz''s prisoners.

Just because someone knows how to run something effectively does not mean that they know how to run anything but that effectively.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

29 Sep 2011, 5:05 pm

Pandabear wrote:

Quote:
Stewart Alexander may be better than President Obama. However, the Evango-Fascists are a far worse choice. The way our electoral system works, it is unthinkable not to support President Obama against the vile forces of evil.


I’ll take the Evango-Fascists any day over that foreigner.
Besides, if you call those “forces” vile and evil they must be good.

Abgal64 wrote:
Quote:
Just because someone knows how to run something effectively does not mean that they know how to run anything but that effectively.


Well it sure is comforting to know that somebody can run something effectively.

:roll:



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

29 Sep 2011, 5:18 pm

Raptor wrote:
Pandabear wrote:
Quote:
Stewart Alexander may be better than President Obama. However, the Evango-Fascists are a far worse choice. The way our electoral system works, it is unthinkable not to support President Obama against the vile forces of evil.


I’ll take the Evango-Fascists any day over that foreigner.
Besides, if you call those “forces” vile and evil they must be good.


Stewart Alexander was born in Newport News, Virginia, United States is he "foreign" cuz he is black?
Are y'all gunna do this to all black candidates who are not republicans? (it kinda make you look dumb)
he is also a veteran so he is magic and can not be questioned

Oh and by the way it is vile and evil to send me money so I will expect that check soon. :lol:


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

29 Sep 2011, 11:56 pm

Abgal64 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Abgal64 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Abgal64 wrote:
First, let us look at the core terms in modern world politics:

"Liberals" are people who want liberty, freedom and choice. True liberals are generally for the free market, or at least some form of market economy, as it allows individual economic choice and freedom. They also are for Democracy, especially liberal democracy (as opposed to the illiberal democracy in a few states such as Singapore.) Thus, a true liberal is one who values freedom and individual choice over all.


Hate to break it to you, but Liberals are not pro-democracy, they are not pro-free market, and are not for people having rights. Maybe they were once but they quite frankly aren't anymore.
I am not pro-democracy, being for a meritocracy, nor am I pro-free market, being for a centrally-planned economy. I am for "rights" but not in the way that true liberals are: They want rights to be free from things whereas I, being pro-authoritative government (not authoritarian, but authoritative) as exemplified best by Singapore in contemporary times and historically probably best by mid-Imperial China (when compared to contemporary states), want guarantees for things: I want rights to housing, a job, education and food, for example, as opposed to rights to bare arms and have privateschooling and homeschooling. This is why I am not a liberal, nor a Democrat (I vote for with the Socialist Party, and my canidate of choice is the doomed but righteous Stewart Alexander; he is not perfect but honest, thoughtful, assertive and far better than Obama, Perry, Palin or Romney.)

Also, you see to be confusing may use of the term "liberal" with the mainstream American media's use of the term: I am using it in the sense of Classical liberals, not politically correct, slightly forward thinking mixed and moderated weak progressive, moderate liberal, moderate conservatives as you seem to be.


Stewart Alexander may be better than President Obama. However, the Evango-Fascists are a far worse choice. The way our electoral system works, it is unthinkable not to support President Obama against the vile forces of evil.


Jabba the Hutt would be a better President than Obama, at least Jabba could run something effectively.
Using that logic, I suppose Josef Mengele, colloquially known as the Angel of Death, a Nazi war criminal, would be an excellent president: He certainly knew how to run something, that something being Block 10, a block where human experimentation was practiced on Auschwitz''s prisoners.

Just because someone knows how to run something effectively does not mean that they know how to run anything but that effectively.


Obama is a typical Chicago Style Politician, whom will do anything they think they can get away with, similar to the Gangster known as Jabba the Hutt from Star Wars. It wouldn't surprise me if Operation Fast and Furious was one of Obama's ideas, to try to come up with a crisis to crack down on gun owners.

pandabear wrote:
Stewart Alexander may be better than President Obama. However, the Evango-Fascists are a far worse choice. The way our electoral system works, it is unthinkable not to support President Obama against the vile forces of evil.


First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

30 Sep 2011, 9:36 am

Inuyasha wrote:

First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.


Stupid and evil "incarnent" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?

Not only are you stupid and evil, but you can't even spell. :roll:



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

30 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm

pandabear wrote:
Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?


http://www.glennbeck.com/becku/


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

01 Oct 2011, 1:53 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.


Stupid and evil "incarnent" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?

Not only are you stupid and evil, but you can't even spell. :roll:


:roll:

Actually, I have my Bachelor's Degree from Purdue University, thank you kindly.

Reason I might not spell something correctly here and there is cause I'm not bothering to use spell-check, or go back and check my spelling or grammar because this is a message board, not an academic paper.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

01 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.


Stupid and evil "incarnent" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?

Not only are you stupid and evil, but you can't even spell. :roll:


:roll:

Actually, I have my Bachelor's Degree from Purdue University, thank you kindly.

Reason I might not spell something correctly here and there is cause I'm not bothering to use spell-check, or go back and check my spelling or grammar because this is a message board, not an academic paper.


:roll:

Academic standards have really plummeted for the younger generation. People my age can spell correctly, and we have no use for "spell-check."



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

01 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.


Stupid and evil "incarnent" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?

Not only are you stupid and evil, but you can't even spell. :roll:


:roll:

Actually, I have my Bachelor's Degree from Purdue University, thank you kindly.

Reason I might not spell something correctly here and there is cause I'm not bothering to use spell-check, or go back and check my spelling or grammar because this is a message board, not an academic paper.


:roll:

Academic standards have really plummeted for the younger generation. People my age can spell correctly, and we have no use for "spell-check."


I can spell things correctly, just I'm not taking the time to go back and check my spelling manually, since this is not an academic setting.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

01 Oct 2011, 2:39 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.


Stupid and evil "incarnent" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?

Not only are you stupid and evil, but you can't even spell. :roll:


:roll:

Actually, I have my Bachelor's Degree from Purdue University, thank you kindly.

Reason I might not spell something correctly here and there is cause I'm not bothering to use spell-check, or go back and check my spelling or grammar because this is a message board, not an academic paper.


:roll:

Academic standards have really plummeted for the younger generation. People my age can spell correctly, and we have no use for "spell-check."


I can spell things correctly, just I'm not taking the time to go back and check my spelling manually, since this is not an academic setting.


:roll:

If you had learned to spell correctly in the first place, you wouldn't need to go back and check your spelling manually.

Whether or not this is an academic setting, your were previously gloating about Mrs. Palin's spelling in her electronic correspondence.

Your poor spelling and grammar reflect poorly on Purdue University, and on right-wing extremists generally.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

01 Oct 2011, 2:55 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

First you claim we're stupid then you claim we're evil incarnent. Seriously those kind of hysterics are not going to work anymore cause people can see right through them.


Stupid and evil "incarnent" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Seriously, what school gave you a B.A.?

Not only are you stupid and evil, but you can't even spell. :roll:


:roll:

Actually, I have my Bachelor's Degree from Purdue University, thank you kindly.

Reason I might not spell something correctly here and there is cause I'm not bothering to use spell-check, or go back and check my spelling or grammar because this is a message board, not an academic paper.


:roll:

Academic standards have really plummeted for the younger generation. People my age can spell correctly, and we have no use for "spell-check."


I can spell things correctly, just I'm not taking the time to go back and check my spelling manually, since this is not an academic setting.


:roll:

If you had learned to spell correctly in the first place, you wouldn't need to go back and check your spelling manually.

Whether or not this is an academic setting, your were previously gloating about Mrs. Palin's spelling in her electronic correspondence.

Your poor spelling and grammar reflect poorly on Purdue University, and on right-wing extremists generally.


My area of study was in the Engineering and Technical side of things, your argument would only have merit if my degree was in English or Liberal Arts.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

01 Oct 2011, 3:13 pm

will support any Republican but Sarah Palin who is really good at doing whats shes told to do she is cleary insane.

My choices are Hermain Cain Mitt Romney or Allen West



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

02 Oct 2011, 12:41 am

@ 'Yasha: 'whom' is only used when the person in question is the object, not the subject, of the sentence.
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/wh ... -whom.aspx