Page 11 of 11 [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11


Is corporal punishment abuse or a valid option?
Abuse, always and without exception 39%  39%  [ 32 ]
Abuse if used on special needs kids, sometimes ok for typical kids 4%  4%  [ 3 ]
It depends on the child, the parent and the circumstances, but it's best to avoid it 28%  28%  [ 23 ]
It's perfectly ok to use although it can be abused just like any other technique 17%  17%  [ 14 ]
Abuse for special needs kids but always ok for others 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Not abusive to any kid and it's not used enough in todays society 8%  8%  [ 7 ]
I didn't know this was about spanking kids, I though this was a kinky thread 5%  5%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 83

Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

29 Apr 2013, 7:43 am

Because you are telling exactly the same stuff? Excusing your own misbehaviour, declaring it as a must have, avoiding yourself from the truth that if you beat your child, that its not the child misbehaving but you?

Quote:
You don't spank just to spank, you spank when it's something really serious and something that disobedience about is not an option.
Look at the things that were meant in this thread for beating their kids. Icecream? Is icecream really serious and something that disobedience is not an option? Two pages ago someone wrote proudly about beating her kids because of icecream. And a small child refusing to give hands before crossing the street? So I dont know, buts either the parent is simply too dumb to think about the easily existing opportunity just to grab the hand, or lift the child and go, or she likes to spank without a "really really serious cause". I mean avoiding to lift my child, doesnt seem that serious to me. People even admitted here in this thread and told (u]proudly[/u] about how they spank their kid when they dont entertain them sufficient or because they have self esteem issues and simply feel themselved opposed when a person doenst agree with them immediatly. So is avioding to go to a professional therapist, to make your own and the life of your child better, a "really, really serious cause" to beat your child?

This was not my father who wrote that stuff in this thread here, so dont tell it is about my father. Its simply about people that are like my father, and that are proud of it, and that really pisses me off how someone can be proud of being an abusing, ignorant parent, telling so proud about how he gives his kids the responsibility for his own failures giving them a possibility to beat them again. Sorry, but I gotta puke.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

29 Apr 2013, 8:45 am

I agree with a lot of what you say, but puke? No need to be so dramatic.



Ancalagon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302

29 Apr 2013, 9:10 am

Schneekugel wrote:
Because you are telling exactly the same stuff?

So what? Evil dictators say that their country is free and wonderful. Politicians in a country that is actually free and wonderful say the same thing. One is lying, the other is not.

Quote:
beating their kids.

Again, we're not talking about beatings. We're talking about spankings.

There is a difference. You're just trying to make people look bad by throwing in emotional words and trash talking them, and hoping people will pay attention to the emotion and not question the faulty logic.

Quote:
Icecream? Is icecream really serious and something that disobedience is not an option? Two pages ago someone wrote proudly about beating her kids because of icecream.

That's not what they said. This is what they said:

Quote:
Er, you're missing the point. This isn't about ice cream. It's about getting to the root of the problem. If the child is giving me a hard time over something unrelated when the real problem is the child didn't get something she wanted after school, having an understanding of the real problem, which may or may not be ice cream, is the first step in dealing with it. It's inappropriate for me as a parent to get derailed over something as silly as ice cream. No amount of "explanations" are going to solve what you believe is an intellectual problem when the real issue has to do with a child's determination to get her way.

And besides, "ice cream" is just a hypothetical. I'm not referring to a specific event, just anything that could come up.


Quote:
People even admitted here in this thread and told (u]proudly[/u] about how they spank their kid when they dont entertain them sufficient or because they have self esteem issues and simply feel themselved opposed when a person doenst agree with them immediatly.

No, they haven't. Stop twisting what other people say.

Quote:
This was not my father who wrote that stuff in this thread here, so dont tell it is about my father. Its simply about people that are like my father,

But they aren't like your father, if what you wrote about your father is accurate. What your father did and what they are talking about doing are quite different.

What your father did is causing you to rant at great length years later, and to curse at people, and to assume that people who talk about spanking their kids in a responsible, healthy way are doing something that would cause their children's teeth to come loose. Something that would cause a child's teeth to come loose is *not* a spanking.

Quote:
and that are proud of it, and that really pisses me off how someone can be proud of being an abusing, ignorant parent, telling so proud about how he gives his kids the responsibility for his own failures giving them a possibility to beat them again. Sorry, but I gotta puke.

This is not what people are actually saying, it's what you assume when you emotionally react to what they say.


_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

29 Apr 2013, 9:34 am

Schneekugel wrote:
Because you are telling exactly the same stuff? Excusing your own misbehaviour, declaring it as a must have, avoiding yourself from the truth that if you beat your child, that its not the child misbehaving but you?

Quote:
You don't spank just to spank, you spank when it's something really serious and something that disobedience about is not an option.
Look at the things that were meant in this thread for beating their kids. Icecream? Is icecream really serious and something that disobedience is not an option? Two pages ago someone wrote proudly about beating her kids because of icecream. And a small child refusing to give hands before crossing the street? So I dont know, buts either the parent is simply too dumb to think about the easily existing opportunity just to grab the hand, or lift the child and go, or she likes to spank without a "really really serious cause". I mean avoiding to lift my child, doesnt seem that serious to me. People even admitted here in this thread and told (u]proudly[/u] about how they spank their kid when they dont entertain them sufficient or because they have self esteem issues and simply feel themselved opposed when a person doenst agree with them immediatly. So is avioding to go to a professional therapist, to make your own and the life of your child better, a "really, really serious cause" to beat your child?

This was not my father who wrote that stuff in this thread here, so dont tell it is about my father. Its simply about people that are like my father, and that are proud of it, and that really pisses me off how someone can be proud of being an abusing, ignorant parent, telling so proud about how he gives his kids the responsibility for his own failures giving them a possibility to beat them again. Sorry, but I gotta puke.

You are equating ALL spankings with what your father did to you. I'm very sorry that you feel you were abused. However, nearly everything you say is an emotional appeal, an appeal to majority, straw man attack, or ad hominem. I'm truly sorry to say this, but you are demonstrating very little more than your own incapability for rational though. That makes it difficult if not impossible to take anything you say seriously.

I'm sure that somehow, somewhere there is a perfectly logical case against spanking. It just doesn't happen to be in any of your posts.

Something else just occurred to me... You have oft repeated that there is no winning an argument, just "explanations." The irony here is that there are a number of us here who have explained ourselves and related our experiences to you. You have done the same. Given the veracity of pro-spanking "explanations" as presented here, you have yet to change your mind. Given your "explanations," we have yet to change our minds. So...if explaining things do not work with adults or at least more mature people, what leads you to believe that children are any easier? Can you see that you in your tenacity are being stubborn or willful? I mean, we all are, not just you. The difference is you are not MY child and therefore I have no right to use coercion or other means to break your will the same way I could with a difficult child. According to you, all I have to do is just explain it. Well, I explained. A few others also explained. So it seems to me that these rules only apply to everyone else but you.

We explained our position on why spanking is one acceptable means of discipline. Because we explained it, by your standard you MUST accept it.

If you cannot accept that, then you must also admit that explanations are not enough. If you can do neither, that makes you inconsistent and a hypocrite. That's just plain truth. You are irrational, and referring to people as "dumb" or "stupid" is ad hominem. You can't make a case like that. All you succeed in demonstrating is your own irrationality and immaturity.

I pity you. I pity you because of how your father mentally and emotionally scarred you. But most of all, I pity you because you stubbornly hold on to your scars and continue to allow your father to define who you are and who you think everyone else should be. My father scarred me in very similar ways, but I refuse to shut my brain off because of someone who no longer holds any significance to me.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

29 Apr 2013, 10:53 am

Schneekugel wrote:
OliveOilMom wrote:

Each child is different. Some kids don't ever need spanking or very rarely. Other kids need a bit more of it. You don't spank just to spank, you spank when it's something really serious and something that disobedience about is not an option. If you care for your child, and if spanking him is the only way to keep him from, say, running into traffic, then spank him. Better a sore bottom for a few minutes than dead from being hit by a truck!


Sorry, but what a sh** and nonsense. The same lousy, dumb excuses where used from my father, to excuse his own failures and misbehavement. "No its not my fault that I do the failure and spank my child. No my wrong behavement its the childs faults."

So I dont know, but I seem to have schizophrenic diseases or whatever, because I am questioning myself why my mother simply needed to talk to me, and my educators in border schools didnt even understand why the hell I should be a problem child, when they never had a problem with me in 5 years. Could be because of them not being total dumbass. Or maybe there was another child that looked like me, but had a complete different behavement. The only idiot and as*hole ever having a problem was that idiot dumbass of a father who was simply to dumb, to mindweak and to shitheaded to educate a child. And because of him being unable to go to a doctor to work on his self esteem problem, he also simple was too dumb and to shitheaded to accept on his own, that HE is the problem, HE was the one misbehaving and the one that needed to get beaten according to his own rules.

So please, explain to me: How the hell is it possible, that I leave my home and my fathers presence and suddenly all the problems "I" create disappear? Do you think an alien kidnapped me and changed me with a clone? So I existed on, so if I was producing all the problems, how the hell can it be that all the problems vanished from one minute to the other, that I wasnt confronted any longer with my s**thead dumbass father? And why on earth was he the only one, that thought that I was behaving not aceptable? Why was it the same with my sister, getting A grades all the time, being a favorite of the teachers, .... but no in his eyes she is an unacceptable child that needs beating from now to then? Why did my grades go up from horrible to ok, the moment I was able to leave this shitpiece of an organic father?

Please tell me, because I simply dont understand why all the problem "I" produced simply vanished the moment this s**thead, that was the only one that could see all that problems, simply vanished out of my life? The moment this as*hole was no longer educating me, the moment the so called "problem child" that noone called a problem child beside him, disappeared.

Sorry, but no. If people are too dumb to educate their children propper its ok, because noone is perfect. But instead of seeking help to do job better, to create a dreamworld for the children, and blame the children to being responsible for the own failures and problems, definitely is not acceptable. The only problem "I" had, was the problem that I refused to accept the wrong behavement of my father. And it was right to do so, because if I had as my sister did, it would have ruined my life as it has my sisters who cant accept herself until nowadays, because of never being good enough.

Sorry, but no excuses for lousy parents, that are pushing their own failures upon their children, because of them being so sick that they are not able to face themselves as not being perfect. Better blame the child and beat it, instead of simply accepting: "Ok, I have to work on my behaviour. Lets see where I can get some help."


It seems that you might have been abused as a child so you don't understand what the rest of us are talking about. Of course if your only experience with spanking is abuse then you will only be able to see it as such. However, most people who spank are not abusive and not your father.

I'm not your father and neither are any of the other posters here who are in favor of spanking when needed. Nobody is trying to defend him. Nothing is going to be worked out about this for you in this thread, I think that would require a professional therapist. I don't mean that in a mean way either, it's obvious that you have some serious issues related to your father which cause you to be completely unable to understand the difference between what we see as spanking and the godawful abuse you see as spanking.

Believe it or not, it's not the same thing and I don't think anyone but you thinks it is.


_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA. ;-)

The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

29 Apr 2013, 12:24 pm

My view on spanking is it simply isn't necessary. Surplus to requirements.

On basic level it is operand conditioning, but you are not talking about lab rats here. With intelligent being there are alternative methods that are better.

Also quite a lot of the time it is the parents own neurotic behavior that is making thing worse. Also It not always obvious what is attention seeking behavior and what isn't, but you can learn the signs, but most importantly, quite a lot of people don't deal with attention seeking behavior correctly. Kids that get spanked or shouted at, get attention. This creates a neurotic cycle.

I do firmly believe the children need structure and genuine discipline (in fact there is some persuasive argument that there isn't enough structured teacher led learning in nursery schools), as child led activity is very popular ATM.



Last edited by 0_equals_true on 29 Apr 2013, 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PsychoSarah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2013
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,109
Location: The division between Sanity and Insanity

29 Apr 2013, 12:26 pm

Depends on the situation.
Got a C on the test, no.
Colored on the furniture, yes.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

30 Apr 2013, 7:09 am

0_equals_true wrote:
My view on spanking is it simply isn't necessary. Surplus to requirements.

On basic level it is operand conditioning, but you are not talking about lab rats here. With intelligent being there are alternative methods that are better.

Also quite a lot of the time it is the parents own neurotic behavior that is making thing worse. Also It not always obvious what is attention seeking behavior and what isn't, but you can learn the signs, but most importantly, quite a lot of people don't deal with attention seeking behavior correctly. Kids that get spanked or shouted at, get attention. This creates a neurotic cycle.

I do firmly believe the children need structure and genuine discipline (in fact there is some persuasive argument that there isn't enough structured teacher led learning in nursery schools), as child led activity is very popular ATM.

See, I actually do agree with most of this. For me spanking is an option, NOT a regular go-to behavior modification all-purpose tool. We may disagree on whether it should be used at all, buy I like what you said about operand conditioning. That's exactly it.

No, we aren't talking about lab rats. But we aren't talking about human beings that are fully capable of adult intelligent communication, either. If punishment doesn't immediately follow misbehavior, the child won't understand what he's being punished for. Our first line of defense, so to speak (not meaning to imply we're at war here) is the verbal warning. The first reminder takes into account that kids forget. The second warning shows the child that the parent is aware that the child's behavior is deliberate and not an accident. Step three means some kind of unpleasant consequence, which can be a range of things depending on the severity of the child's behavior.

Sure, a lot of it is attention-seeking. For some children, there is no such thing as negative attention. This may seem hard to believe, but a lot of children will act out not because they want a spanking, but because a spanking is preferable to being ignored. In that case, spanking is just another kind of reward, which only frustrates the parent who can't figure out why it loses it's effectiveness. So, yeah, it does feed a sort of neurotic cycle IF the parent isn't willing to investigate a child's motivations.