Jacoby wrote:
If people want to defend Hillary on policy then it is a discussion we can have but it's not one any of her supporters want to have especially when it comes to foreign policy and her time as Secretary of State or as a US Senator.
Quote:
You tend to focus on the worst aspects of a candidate so her incompetence might get overshadowed by her corruption, criminality, and total lack of ethics. You fight fire with fire, simple as that.
How do you conclude I focus on the worst aspects of candidates when I named a good aspects of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton (as well as Hitler, Pol Pot, and Saddam Hussein)?
It was you was unable to name a good aspect of the candidate you oppose. Did you not know she was very active in children's rights advocacy?
Jacoby wrote:
Would you like to talk about Hillary's foreign policy? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
Hillary has contributed a great deal to the rise of ISIS thru her support of the Iraq War, the destabilizing intervention into Libya, and our disastrous policy in Syria. Her sabrerattling against Russia is something I totally oppose and rapprochement with Russia is central to what I believe needs to be done which is a position that Trump is actually attacked for from these people.
You may if you want, but as opposed as I was to the second war in Iraq, and as much as I wish our country was not involved in these foreign conflicts, starting a war and ending a war are two different things, and I find it hard to fault any politician in being involved in an inherited war or military conflict. To that end, I do not think Donald Trump will be successful in abstracting us from it, if that is even his intention.
War is only over when both parties decide it's over.