Are there any post coup attempt EX-trump supporters here?
Whatever you think of Trump's supporters, or Democrats, or Independents - generalising, belittling and denigrating whole groups of people - some of whom may well be members - is not acceptable. It's not acceptable under the site rules, nor acceptable under the guidelines here in PPR.
Knock it off, or the thread gets it...
Is this about my Trump game?
Trump card?
No, about spotting Trump supporters, ISpy them. Not sure if cornflake meant me or someone else. Hard to tell.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
goldfish21
Veteran

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Secondly, the Trump supporting raiders used force to get inside the Capitol, but never had any plan about what to do when they got inside, so to call it a coup attempt is ridiculous.
Well, I have seen his words and heard them. He certainly incited his supporters to take action, as did his accomplices. He is on record.
And the bombs? Those were not serious. The guy with the restraints? Not a hostage attempt? And what were the calls to hang Mike Pence about? 58 capitol police were beaten and one lost his life? Not serious? Hanging a noose and disabling police cars is just a gag? Even Elizabeth from Kentucky thought she was a member of a revolution.
Perhaps you need a bit of a refresher: 2021 storming of the United States Capitol
And yet for some reason the Capitol rioters didn’t set off any bombs or fire any weapons, even after one of their own (unarmed) had been shot and killed by a policeman.
The rioters used excessive force to make a political point. That still doesn’t make it a coup attempt.
That is, no offence, a pretty poor piece of reasoning. Because I am against overturning a democratic election through violence, I am for everything the government does?
That’s not what I said, and that’s not what I meant. The people get given the same recurring crap whichever party is elected because it’s basically the same establishment in charge, and they use the phony democratic system as a cloak of legitimacy. So although you people might disagree with individual things the establishment does, by treating the democratic system as sacred you are basically supporting the establishment whatever it does.
Wrong again. But at least you are consistently wrong. I am absolutely opposed to all political violence. Ironically, you are still trying to defend a president of the United States and his supporters that instigated an insurrection on our democracy.
What I meant was to ask if lefists ever question their own beliefs when they see political violence carried out in the name of those beliefs.
Also, I said right at the start that I view Trump as a fraud, so when I say that he did not instigate an attack on the Capitol, I’m not defending him, I’m just stating a fact. But yes, I sympathize with his supporters.
The deaths were tragic. But I note the media-inspired language you use. “Five people died”. Yes, four of them were Trump supporters. And the only person who can truthfully said to have been murdered that day was the (unarmed) female Trump supporter shot by a policeman.
As a general principle, no I’m not, but I am honest about it. I doubt anyone in here is truly against ALL political violence, or if they are, then they are naïve. American independence was won through political violence.
Yes, he went to Kenosha to defend people and property from violent criminals, and when they attacked him, he defended himself.
That wasn't "political violence", but it was exploited for political purposes. So I am no more disgusted by it than I am by similar cases (and worse cases) of police brutality that don’t get as much attention because
I'm more angry about the fact that the authorities couldn’t use those measures to protect the thousands and thousands of people who had their lives and neighborhoods ruined by the criminal rioters, and that they only used those methods when the precious elite citadels were under threat.
Well, maybe part of the reason it’s imploding is because people are too busy scanning the horizon for some great Nazi or fascist threat to turn round and look at the reality of the liberal democracy they deem so sacred.
I am not going to condone illegality, but I’ll say now that I view the Capitol rioters as mostly decent people, and the BLM/antifa rioters - and the criminal establishment that covered for them - as mostly trash. So I am not really trying to draw an equivalence here, and I didn't mean to give the impression that I was.
It was a coup.
She was a military trained domestic terrorist that breached the Senate, which is protected by armed guards, and got shot. In other words, she f****d around and found out. I have Less Than Zero sympathy for her.
_________________
No

auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,809
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Are they too embarrassed to admit, "I was wrong and you were all right, he was a bad person and he really wanted to rule our country and I had no idea he was capable of this. Everyone the media said about him and lawyers and doctors, everyone was right, I've been duped. I'm so sorry for ever supporting and voting for him. I had no idea that voting him into office would lead to this."
Well, *I* certainly won't be voting for him again.

goldfish21
Veteran

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
So, the story I keep hearing, from people in this very thread, is:
"Trump gave a speech. He 'incited violence' and encouraged a bunch of his supporters to storm the Capitol on a whim. The FBI intends to identify and prosecute those people for breaking-and-entering the Capitol." These people were Trump cultists who'd been brainwashed by years of disinformation by Trump, and he riled them up that day in Washington, and they all responded. But now you're saying this was a highly-coordinated, pre-planned, special operations attempt (even though not a single shot was fired by the highly-organized insurrectionists). Fortunately, it was all thwarted by a handful of police who, despite being highly overwhelmed, and deliberately put at a disadvantage by these behind-the-curtain operatives who control security in-and-around the District of Columbia, were able to stop these Mission Impossible-style secret agents from carrying out their highly-skilled and highly-organized coup.
If that's the case, then the actual rioters, the "bumbling idiots who're more of a distraction than anything," aren't really guilty of a coup attempt if they were too stupid to even know what their role in the whole thing was. It wasn't pre-meditated on their end, and they didn't know why they were doing what they were instructed to do. Still, since they successfully managed to break-and-enter the Capitol and cause disruption, why didn't the "highly-skilled" mercenaries who were already informed of the plan and just waiting for the breech to occur not step in and carry out the pre-planned coup? They got their distraction.
So, we've got useful idiots breaking-and-entering, breaching, trespassing, looting...all illegal, no question. But none of them knew about this greater coup, and none of them were capable of perpetrating a coup on their own. They were simply enticed to riot on the words of a president shortly beforehand, as the story goes.
But they're all guilty of a coup because that was the intention of these highly-skilled, behind-the-scenes people in place before Trump even spoke. And none of these "agents" with prior knowledge of the drill seem to have been identified.
Okay, who are all these lawmakers, why haven't they been identified? If you're saying people in the crowd themselves were these skilled & trained individuals, then they were certainly aware of the plan before Trump even opened his mouth. Yet, the people the FBI have identified and arrested all seem to be a bunch of the bumbling morons who were oblivious. Also, where were all the weapons & defenses this paramilitary unit had? The Capitol police were outnumbered, yet the "insurrection" ended without a bloodbath and before military units had to do a full raid.
It's like we're now trying to tell two stories and weave them together - A bunch of morons breached the Capitol (illegal, no doubt). They were enticed by the President. But they were too stupid to know the end-game of their actions. But they're still guilty of a coup, even if it wasn't their intention and even if it was beyond their scope, because these "shadow figures" all knew what would happen in advance, and were ready to overthrow the government military style, but then suddenly didn't. And we're not sure who those people are. But international security experts says so.
This is what you're telling me?
Then the rioters we've seen aren't really guilty of the coup themselves. It sounds like entrapment on the part of the president and his operatives. And, since these morons did their part, why didn't the highly-skilled faction enact phase 2?
EDIT: And, again, in your scenario, the unaware morons, while certainly guilty of trespassing and damaging a public building, were not actually guilty of seditious conspiracy of attempting a coup if they didn't even know what the plan was.
Insiders are all being investigated. They’ll be expelled, charged with treason etc.
How is it somehow my fault that treasonous republicans could only recruit such minimal numbers of military/police trained insurrectionists and had to rely on morons that didn’t know what they were doing?
They’re all going to jail. Maybe trump included.
_________________
No

auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,809
Location: the island of defective toy santas
How is it somehow my fault that treasonous republicans could only recruit such minimal numbers of military/police trained insurrectionists and had to rely on morons that didn’t know what they were doing?
They’re all going to jail. Maybe trump included.
Perhaps, but what you're peddling is still hearsay and contradictory to the official narrative. And what was the end goal? Temporary disruption of the certification process? Actually harming, taking hostages, and perhaps killing members of Congress? Would all branches of the US military back and defend these intruders and take orders from whatever they might have decreed from the Capitol?
I still fail to see how this could, in any reality, have totally dismantled and usurped the federal government of the USA or changed anything.
goldfish21
Veteran

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

I’m pretty sure this screen grab is from a critically acclaimed film called “Capitol Punishment.”
<image removed>
_________________
No

Last edited by magz on 15 Jan 2021, 6:46 am, edited 1 time in total.: Highly suggestive visual content removed
goldfish21
Veteran

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
How is it somehow my fault that treasonous republicans could only recruit such minimal numbers of military/police trained insurrectionists and had to rely on morons that didn’t know what they were doing?
They’re all going to jail. Maybe trump included.
Perhaps, but what you're peddling is still hearsay and contradictory to the official narrative. And what was the end goal? Temporary disruption of the certification process? Actually harming, taking hostages, and perhaps killing members of Congress? Would all branches of the US military back and defend these intruders and take orders from whatever they might have decreed from the Capitol?
I still fail to see how this could, in any reality, have totally dismantled and usurped the federal government of the USA or changed anything.
You’ll have to ask trump and his boot lickers.
I know you can’t. But I’m hoping someone does under oath & we all get to find out.
_________________
No

Whatever you think of Trump's supporters, or Democrats, or Independents - generalising, belittling and denigrating whole groups of people - some of whom may well be members - is not acceptable. It's not acceptable under the site rules, nor acceptable under the guidelines here in PPR.
Knock it off, or the thread gets it...
Is this about my Trump game?
Trump card?
No, about spotting Trump supporters, ISpy them. Not sure if cornflake meant me or someone else. Hard to tell.
I spy with my little eye something beginning with Q
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,809
Location: the island of defective toy santas

I’m pretty sure this screen grab is from a critically acclaimed film called “Capitol Punishment.”
<image removed>
in prison that horny guy better watch his back.
Last edited by magz on 15 Jan 2021, 6:46 am, edited 1 time in total.: Highly suggestive visual content removed
Anwser to my earlier question can be found here.
Anyone wondering how conspiracies spread among the MAGAs and how support for the coup spread should listen to Shannon Foley-Martinez. She's an ex-Neo-Nazi and QAnon supporter who is also (believe it or not) a marketing consultant in Yale University. They use clever people to spread false conspiracies to dumb MAGAs.
Despite her ex-No Nazi crudentials I appreciate this woman's honesty as it gives some insight into the MAGA mind. I wish her well in her rehabilitation into normal society.
Last edited by cyberdad on 15 Jan 2021, 4:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Well, the way I see it, it was a protest/minor-riot by some extremists.
And you can't say that *everyone* who participated were violent people.
Apparently, the most aggressive people involved were white supremacists, who are a minor demographic in America.
I did Google about their numbers, but could only find "More than we think, but less than they want you to think".
If anyone can give a link to their estimated numbers, it would be appreciated.
The main thing to consider is that it had zero chance of changing government, hence, it was a violent protest, rather than an attempted coup, surely.
I beg to differ with the "International Experts".
Remember, there is politics involved so I tend to take what is said with a grain of salt.
Once again, could someone explain how the incident at Capital Hill could have succeeded in changing the government?
How could it have even *threatened* the government, at that time?
Are you saying it was a 'preamble' for something bigger down the line?
Even if it were, it could hardly be called an 'attempted coup', at the time.
The problem seems to be that a relatively few 'deplorables' are responsible for this anti-social behaviour.
I am not saying America doesn't have a social problem, btw.
Majority? So the original polls were wrong, or has there been another?
Also, you can't believe polls at their face value.
No poll predicted a trump win 4 years ago, did they?
And people aren't always honest, especially if their names are 'Donald Duck' and 'Mickey Mouse'.
Secondly, the Trump supporting raiders used force to get inside the Capitol, but never had any plan about what to do when they got inside, so to call it a coup attempt is ridiculous.
Well, I have seen his words and heard them. He certainly incited his supporters to take action, as did his accomplices. He is on record.
I agree.
I was gobsmacked when I heard trump shite-stirring his "Useful Idiots".
Talk about a brain fart.
Who said it wasn't serious? It just wasn't as serious as 19 people dying and $2,000,000,000 (2 billion) worth of damages and peoples' businesses and futures destroyed.
While both were bad, the leftist riots were worse.
But then, there could be more violence down the line.
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,809
Location: the island of defective toy santas
He is almost certain to at least get impeached. All that's needed is about 17 Republicans to vote for conviction when the Senate tries him.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg.....
People like Mitch McConnell, McCarthy (all staunch Trump supporters previously), have spoken out vociferously against Trump
And the Joint Chiefs of Staff!
Apart from some Republicans genuinely appalled by trump's brain fart, there will be others who are simply 'rats deserting the sinking ship'.
trump never had the support, at levels of real power, that he needed for a coup.
It was a good dummy spit, though.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump’s pardons |
28 May 2025, 8:39 pm |
Trump says the U.S. will end sanctions on Syria |
13 May 2025, 9:45 pm |
Trump announces new name for the hoildays |
08 May 2025, 4:30 pm |
Trump Carney meeting |
06 May 2025, 9:22 pm |