Page 11 of 13 [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 37
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

01 Mar 2021, 3:37 am

goldfish21 wrote:
Mikah wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
Yet nowhere on Earth has a real plan for where or how to store nuclear waste for the next 10,000 years.. soo, yeah, that's a problem.


Sites designed for long term nuclear waste storage are being constructed right now in the US, the UK, Finland and Sweden to name a few. How's the fleet of space miners coming along?


Space miners will be in action before any government anywhere comes up with a container for nuclear waste that'll last 10,000 years.


KBS-3. It looks fairly robust, not an exercise in fantasy. The Onkalo site is being constructed right now to house 100 years of nuclear waste

http://www.skb.com/publication/2492672/TR-19-14.pdf


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

01 Mar 2021, 2:59 pm

Image


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,805
Location: Indiana

01 Mar 2021, 3:17 pm

goldfish21 wrote:
Yet nowhere on Earth has a real plan for where or how to store nuclear waste for the next 10,000 years.. soo, yeah, that's a problem.


The threat posed by nuclear waste and nuclear material has been way overblown.

It is explained in the following article:

Validity of the Linear No-Threshold Theory of Radiation Carcinogenesis at Low Doses


_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

01 Mar 2021, 9:12 pm

Off Topic
goldfish21 wrote:
Image


Quote:
Mr Moore's documentary, which is available free of charge on the internet, casts doubt over the efficacy of renewables, in particular solar and wind energy.


You might like to have a look at this:



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,774
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm

many scientists are on board with the thought that the earth's population exceeds the earth's carrying capacity. issac asimov said that back in the 70s and it has only much gotten worse since then. we sentient beings and all our animals and stuff are choking this earth, and there will be hell to pay sooner than we think.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

01 Mar 2021, 9:36 pm

auntblabby wrote:
many scientists are on board with the thought that the earth's population exceeds the earth's carrying capacity. issac asimov said that back in the 70s and it has only much gotten worse since then. we sentient beings and all our animals and stuff are choking this earth, and there will be hell to pay sooner than we think.


I doubt that you nor I will be there when/if the shite hits the fan, good and proper.

I luv the fact I don't have kids, btw.
Do you? :wink:



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

02 Mar 2021, 4:20 am

Luckily, the rule of people in developed countries having less children seems to be worldwide - when nations become "developed", drive to spawn countless babies lowers a lot.
It makes sense - when chances that all your children reach maturity approaches almost 100%, you don't need to have six so maybe one would survive.
Humans are incredibly adaptive.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

02 Mar 2021, 4:22 am

magz wrote:
Luckily, the rule of people in developed countries having less children seems to be worldwide - when nations become "developed", drive to spawn countless babies lowers a lot.
It makes sense - when chances that all your children reach maturity approaches almost 100%, you don't need to have six so maybe one would survive.
Humans are incredibly adaptive.


I don't need *any* children to survive. 8)



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,774
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Mar 2021, 5:49 am

it makes me feel like an incomplete human.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

02 Mar 2021, 5:51 am

auntblabby wrote:
it makes me feel like an incomplete human.


Your genetic programming is strong. 8)



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,774
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Mar 2021, 5:52 am

Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
it makes me feel like an incomplete human.


Your genetic programming is strong. 8)

does that mean a good thing, or an ungood thing?



jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,805
Location: Indiana

02 Mar 2021, 9:41 am

Texas Legislature held marathon hearings a week after the freeze. That testimony, and an increasing flow of information from operators on the ground, has produced a more complete picture of what went wrong during a storm that plunged Texas into a deep freeze colder than most of Alaska.

Federal and state tax policy have encouraged the overbuilding of wind, and to a lesser extent, solar power, resulting in cheap, subsidized power flooding the Texas grid. This inexpensive but unreliable power has acted as a powerful disincentive to build needed natural gas power plants.

In the past five years, Texas saw an increase of about 20,000 megawatts of installed wind and solar capacity with a net loss of 4,000 megawatts of gas and coal-fired power plants. This 4,000 megawatts, had it been built or not prematurely retired, would have saved lives during the 2021 St. Valentine’s Day Storm.

We know that wind turbines were affected, with half of them freezing up. Over the course of 2019, Texas wind produced about 34% of its capacity – from hour-to-hour and season-to-season, sometimes more than 70%, sometimes close to zero. At one point during the storm, solar was producing no electricity while wind produced about 1% of its potential output. Since electricity must be produced the moment it is needed, that meant that natural gas power plants had to make up the shortfall.

The emerging data from thermal – gas, coal, and nuclear – power plants suggests that there were some cold-related failures. But, as ERCOT struggled to keep the lights on, the grid became unstable, tripping additional power plants offline to protect their massive generators from destructive interaction with a fluctuating line frequency.

As ERCOT issued the order to start load shedding – rotating blackouts – some of the darkened circuits included vital oil and gas infrastructure. This uncoordinated move starved natural gas power plants of their fuel – leading to a further loss of power and the widespread and incorrect rumor that wellhead and pipeline freeze off contributed to the disaster.

When these systems lost power, gas production dropped 75%. An Obama-era environmental rule that forced oilfield compressors to switch from natural gas to electric likely made things worse. Eventually, power was restored, and natural gas production ramped back up to meet electricity generation demand.

Source: Texas' blackouts – here's the truth about why they happened and what we have to do next


_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."


Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 70,454
Location: Over there

02 Mar 2021, 1:40 pm

:roll: Fox News. Well, no ax to grind there, no siree...






_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,774
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Mar 2021, 2:00 pm

the rightwing war with reality continues and accelerates.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

02 Mar 2021, 2:02 pm

jimmy m wrote:
Texas Legislature held marathon hearings a week after the freeze. That testimony, and an increasing flow of information from operators on the ground, has produced a more complete picture of what went wrong during a storm that plunged Texas into a deep freeze colder than most of Alaska.

Federal and state tax policy have encouraged the overbuilding of wind, and to a lesser extent, solar power, resulting in cheap, subsidized power flooding the Texas grid. This inexpensive but unreliable power has acted as a powerful disincentive to build needed natural gas power plants.

In the past five years, Texas saw an increase of about 20,000 megawatts of installed wind and solar capacity with a net loss of 4,000 megawatts of gas and coal-fired power plants. This 4,000 megawatts, had it been built or not prematurely retired, would have saved lives during the 2021 St. Valentine’s Day Storm.

We know that wind turbines were affected, with half of them freezing up. Over the course of 2019, Texas wind produced about 34% of its capacity – from hour-to-hour and season-to-season, sometimes more than 70%, sometimes close to zero. At one point during the storm, solar was producing no electricity while wind produced about 1% of its potential output. Since electricity must be produced the moment it is needed, that meant that natural gas power plants had to make up the shortfall.

The emerging data from thermal – gas, coal, and nuclear – power plants suggests that there were some cold-related failures. But, as ERCOT struggled to keep the lights on, the grid became unstable, tripping additional power plants offline to protect their massive generators from destructive interaction with a fluctuating line frequency.

As ERCOT issued the order to start load shedding – rotating blackouts – some of the darkened circuits included vital oil and gas infrastructure. This uncoordinated move starved natural gas power plants of their fuel – leading to a further loss of power and the widespread and incorrect rumor that wellhead and pipeline freeze off contributed to the disaster.

When these systems lost power, gas production dropped 75%. An Obama-era environmental rule that forced oilfield compressors to switch from natural gas to electric likely made things worse. Eventually, power was restored, and natural gas production ramped back up to meet electricity generation demand.

Source: Texas' blackouts – here's the truth about why they happened and what we have to do next


:lol:

Why are you ignoring the windmills work just fine in cold states that require grid operators to winterize them so they don't fail? :?

Windmills didn't freeze up because they're windmills. They work just fine in Alaska. They froze up because Texas was too stupid to make the installers pay to ensure they couldn't freeze up. Full stop.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,774
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Mar 2021, 2:16 pm

^^^too GD CHEAP to maintain their own equipment. as well as stupid.