DeanFoley wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
DeanFoley wrote:
ID is not science. It never will be. It's utterly ridiculous.
Depending on which definition of science one is currently using, ID may not be "science".
It's merely true.
If complexity needs a creator, then the creator needs a creator. But of course, ''God has always been there''. Utter rubbish.
Too much for our human minds, huh? Could it be -- and this is just a hunch -- that the essence of God may be
a bit beyond what seems normal to our reasoning? You are no more in a position to pronounce "utter rubbish" upon a Creator you can't understand than am I. And I wouldn't
dare think that my mind is vast enough to know the ins and outs of how God exists.
To do so would be the height of arrogance. (Congratulations on that.)
DeanFoley wrote:
You know, I laugh at people who say the world is intelligently designed anyway. Broken crust, crossing respiratory and digestive tracks...if God exists, then God is an idiot.
Really? Well, our leading scientists must be even stupider, because they haven't figured out exactly how the human body works yet. When scientists fully understand the human brain, get back to me.
(And it's bad form to call your Designer an idiot, for reasons of self-embarrassment, to being with...

)
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.