Atheists: Is stealing wrong? If so, explain why.

Page 11 of 13 [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

29 Dec 2008, 5:31 pm

tl;dr

Anyway, are there a profusion of naturalistic fallacies in this thread or am I not reading carefully enough? I mean, sure there may be a reason that societies shun theft or respect property, but that just knocks the question back to a utility justification (assuming because it has been useful it still is), or worse just an appeal to nature. On the one side then stealing reduces to a question of a broader moral system (not surprisingly), but on the other side it resolves itself in poppycock.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Dec 2008, 5:58 pm

The morality imputation of stealing becomes crystal clear when you realize someone has stolen from you. Stole your computer, your video game, your money, etc.



z0rp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 747
Location: New York, USA

29 Dec 2008, 6:14 pm

It depends really. If you mean just normal taking something from someone else, you probably wouldn't do it considering the fact that putting yourself in their shoes, it sucks to have things stolen from you. And even if you don't care, there's a large chance you'll get caught. The other factor is that some people really don't care or like to take risks and might steal if they feel they won't get caught. Then there's piracy, which can be considered stealing even though you're not physically taking something from someone else, so a lot of people seem to do that.

But really I don't see how what I've listed above only applies to Atheists, especially as we're even more of a minority in prison, so unless the Theists are doing the more brutal crimes and we only get arrested for stealing or if we're just good at getting away with it I don't see us stealing much really. And I myself have done piracy in the past I admit although I've never stolen physical objects before. I do feel stealing is wrong though.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

29 Dec 2008, 6:55 pm

ed wrote:
b9 wrote:
thieves are parasites.
they are like fleas who steal the blood from my ankles. i love innocent animals, but i have no mercy for fleas.
i experienced fleas once.

i did not feel any mercy toward them. i ended each fleas life with satisfaction during that plague.

they are my enemies.
people who take what they did not earn are just like fleas.


slowmutant wrote:
I couldn't have said it better myself!



funny... sounds like you do :D


there is a lot of intellectual snobbery on this forum.
i do not see why you should be nasty to me and point out (with a smiley) that slowmutant writes better than me.

i am told often that my posts are just drivel and i should not bother posting to topics that are above my head.

so what if i am not very smart.

i think i have a right to post my ideas even if they are just trash among the gems of your own.



ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

29 Dec 2008, 7:12 pm

b9 wrote:
ed wrote:
b9 wrote:
thieves are parasites.
they are like fleas who steal the blood from my ankles. i love innocent animals, but i have no mercy for fleas.
i experienced fleas once.

i did not feel any mercy toward them. i ended each fleas life with satisfaction during that plague.

they are my enemies.
people who take what they did not earn are just like fleas.


slowmutant wrote:
I couldn't have said it better myself!



funny... sounds like you do :D


there is a lot of intellectual snobbery on this forum.
i do not see why you should be nasty to me and point out (with a smiley) that slowmutant writes better than me.

i am told often that my posts are just drivel and i should not bother posting to topics that are above my head.

so what if i am not very smart.

i think i have a right to post my ideas even if they are just trash among the gems of your own.


I'm sorry, but you're reading something into my post that isn't there. I'm not compairing you two at all. I said that you two seemed to be advocating the death penalty for stealing, which you both denied. So I quoted part of both of your posts to show that "it sounds like you do" (advocate the death penalty for stealing.)

I added the smily to show that I was being friendly, as opposed to belligerant.



Last edited by ed on 29 Dec 2008, 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Dec 2008, 7:14 pm

b9, you have the right to post here unless the site admin says otherwise. Don't worry about the quality of your writing. It's fine.



ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

29 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm

slowmutant wrote:
b9, you have the right to post here unless the site admin says otherwise. Don't worry about the quality of your writing. It's fine.


Absolutely! :D



Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,980

29 Dec 2008, 8:08 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Haliphron wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


So stealing is wrong simply because The Lord said so? :roll:


Yes.



This is one of the reasons Im not a christian. I cant respect the authority of something that cant be bothered to forcefully demonstrate its presence AND at least provide a rational justification for its motives.



AspieAtheistAlly
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 43

29 Dec 2008, 10:34 pm

Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


If you need a god to keep you from stealing, that would make you some kind of sociopath, or kleptomaniac.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm

AspieAtheistAlly wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


If you need a god to keep you from stealing, that would make you some kind of sociopath, or kleptomaniac.


Disagree.



AspieAtheistAlly
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 43

29 Dec 2008, 11:18 pm

slowmutant wrote:
AspieAtheistAlly wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


If you need a god to keep you from stealing, that would make you some kind of sociopath, or kleptomaniac.


Disagree.


I was engaging in hyperbole, but the point is is that you have to be moraly deficient if the only thing that keeps you in line is the fear of divine punishment.



z0rp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 747
Location: New York, USA

30 Dec 2008, 1:20 am

slowmutant wrote:
AspieAtheistAlly wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


If you need a god to keep you from stealing, that would make you some kind of sociopath, or kleptomaniac.


Disagree.

I actually agree with him, if the only thing holding you back from stealing or murdering is purely your belief in god then there's something severely wrong with you.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

30 Dec 2008, 4:22 am

AspieAtheistAlly wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
AspieAtheistAlly wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


If you need a god to keep you from stealing, that would make you some kind of sociopath, or kleptomaniac.


Disagree.


I was engaging in hyperbole, but the point is is that you have to be moraly deficient if the only thing that keeps you in line is the fear of divine punishment.


Agree.

A good person wishes only to do good.

A bad person wishes only to do evil.



timeisdead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 895
Location: Nowhere

30 Dec 2008, 7:59 am

A good solution to theft is for the legal system to instate a punishment in which the thief is to pay 7 times the value of whatever is stolen to his victim out of his own pocket. The only exception would be when the perpetrator could not afford it and stole certain items due to necessity such as food or diapers (not DVD players or X-boxes or gold chains ect.). These would be decided on a case by case basis, although they would still face negative consequences.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

30 Dec 2008, 8:59 am

ed wrote:
b9 wrote:
ed wrote:
b9 wrote:
thieves are parasites.
they are like fleas who steal the blood from my ankles. i love innocent animals, but i have no mercy for fleas.
i experienced fleas once.

i did not feel any mercy toward them. i ended each fleas life with satisfaction during that plague.

they are my enemies.
people who take what they did not earn are just like fleas.


slowmutant wrote:
I couldn't have said it better myself!



funny... sounds like you do :D


there is a lot of intellectual snobbery on this forum.
i do not see why you should be nasty to me and point out (with a smiley) that slowmutant writes better than me.

i am told often that my posts are just drivel and i should not bother posting to topics that are above my head.

so what if i am not very smart.

i think i have a right to post my ideas even if they are just trash among the gems of your own.


I'm sorry, but you're reading something into my post that isn't there. I'm not compairing you two at all. I said that you two seemed to be advocating the death penalty for stealing, which you both denied. So I quoted part of both of your posts to show that "it sounds like you do" (advocate the death penalty for stealing.)

I added the smily to show that I was being friendly, as opposed to belligerant.

ok i am sorry i could not follow your post in the correct way.

i never indicated i was in favour of death penalties for thieves.

i squash fleas because they have stolen a drop of blood that i ate an honest meal to produce.
they are nothing but suckers of others fortune.
their lives should not have evolved and i do not like fleas at all.

but humans steal because they are incapable of providing all they want for themselves.
that is not in the same vein as biological parasites (pardon the pun).

i thought somewhat today about it and i have an idea that "banishment" and "exile" is better than prisons.
my idea is almost like an anti prison.

banish criminals from all our honest cities and towns.
let them fend for themselves in the outer fringes of the bushes where they are allowed to be free with other criminals of their ilk.
they will eat each other up in a nightmare of hellish proportions.
they will learn that to live permanently among only criminal people is to burn in hell.

i should not post this because i am beyond tired and i am "sleep posting".
but submit i will anyway



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

30 Dec 2008, 9:00 am

timeisdead wrote:
A good solution to theft is for the legal system to instate a punishment in which the thief is to pay 7 times the value of whatever is stolen to his victim out of his own pocket. The only exception would be when the perpetrator could not afford it and stole certain items due to necessity such as food or diapers (not DVD players or X-boxes or gold chains ect.). These would be decided on a case by case basis, although they would still face negative consequences.


What's wrong with the current solution?