Fort56 wrote:
Henriksson wrote:
LiendaBalla wrote:
I believe there is a God. I believe God to be a form of something existing. Yet, for some reason humans WANT to think it's all loveing, pampering, and what have you. We human kind also wants to think it's as 'smart' or primative as us, and something that actualy experiances emotion. I don't believe that. Things are as they are. What purpose does nature actualy serve besides... existing anyway? Are most people trying to fill the blanks?
And yeah, about Satan. Again something non humanoid, supposedly being talked about like it's humanoid.

For some strange reason, most people think the critter in the garden of Eden was Satan, when really it isn't specified.
I don't get how people keep assumeing a God is all loveing or hateing. Makes no sence to me, really.
But what makes you believe there is a diety in the first place? Surely there must be a reason, no?
What makes you think houses you see around had builders to build them? Maybe they just put themselves together. Or course they didn't, but neither did the universe.
The Teleological argument is full of holes,
as can be seen here.Quote:
The argument from design is one of the "proofs" for the existence of God. In its basic form, this argument infers from the intelligent order and created beauty of the universe that there is an intelligent Designer and Creator of the universe. The argument has been criticized for begging the question: it assumes the universe is designed in order to prove that it is the work of a designer. The argument also suppresses evidence: for all its beauty and grandeur, the universe is also full of, well, to be delicate, let us say that the universe is also full of nasties. I suppose I should be more specific, but I think the reader knows the kind of thing I mean: babies born without brains, good people suffering monstrous tortures such as neurofibromatosis, evil people basking in the sun and enjoying power, reputation, etc. Volcanoes erupting, earthquakes rattling the planet, hurricanes and tornadoes blindly wiping out thousands of lives a day. Is it unfair to call these things the nasties, what is blithely referred to by theists as non-moral evil or physical evil? To say, as many defenders of Design do, that these nasties only seem nasty to us but we are ignorant of God's plan and vision and cannot know how good these nasties really are, is self-refuting. If we can't know what's good and what's not, we can't know whether the design, if any, is good or bad.
_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.