Turns out that the Tea Party is overwhelmingly white xtian

Page 12 of 18 [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

28 Mar 2011, 12:27 am

ikorack wrote:
sources?


I remember an article in Time soon after the Tea Party arose, in which it was clearly stated how people were flocking to the Tea Party out of fear of a black president. Also, white supremacist groups were toning down their rhetoric in order to attract people who might otherwise have steered clear of them.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

28 Mar 2011, 12:31 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
ikorack wrote:
No it isn't they are drawing unjust comparisons between tea partiers and the KKK, they do not have the same goals, and it's really not funny to paint a group as racists even if you are joking(and I am not sure if you are joking or not, either way its rude and pointless, tea partiers are not white supremacists).


Considering the KKK was founded when most Americans were racist, I don't see much of a difference.

Now, saying the Tea Party is full of racists would be hitting below the belt.


Which some people in this thread have already attempted to do.

Master_Pedant wrote:
There have also been polls showing the Tea Partisans think "too much is made of issues affecting blacks", that racial profiling is okay, and that the low economic status of minorities is due purely to not working hard enough. It's sort of a dilemia any thinking person who believes the US system is meritocratic must face - why are some groups disportionately poorer than the others? The ideology that justifies many Tea Partisans believe that poverty is do to a lack of diligence (an attitude similar to what many Anglo-Manitoban racists held of the Eastern Europeans who moved to Winnipeg's North End and later generations of Europeans held towards the aboriginal population in Winnipeg's North End).


It is more complex than that, we should also be asking how much of the assistance programs are actually hurting the minorities they are supposed to be helping.

Then there are people of minority backgrounds whom are born into poverty and through hard work and shear tenacity they manage to become highly successful. Can't remember the gentleman's name over at Fox Business that is one of those success stories (primarily cause I don't watch Fox Business (I get depressed enough as it is listening to the news)). I just remember he was on one time on Fox News (I think it was Glenn Beck that had him on).

People can succeed in this country if they put their minds to it. There is really a balancing act here, how much is helping minorities actually helping and how much is just giving them a crutch and an excuse to not try. It really is not a cut-and-dry issue

Orwell wrote:
An interesting thing (to me at least) is the differing interpretations liberals and conservatives apply to the same data.


Uh huh, okay you're starting off okay so far.

Orwell wrote:
It applies in most social areas, but a bit more starkly in race relations. Liberals see unequal outcomes and take that as evidence of some systemic issue, such as unequal opportunities (eg "blacks are often born into poor neighborhoods without good educational opportunities") or overt discrimination ("the man's keeping us down").


There are white kids born into poor neighborhoods too. The mentality of the "man is keeping us down," is kinda drilled into these kids too, so the idea is why bother trying because the white man will just make sure they fail, and that is bull****.

Orwell wrote:
Right-wingers see unequal outcomes and assume either inherent differences (eg "blacks are genetically inferior to whites") or differences in work ethic ("blacks are lazy"). Looking at more detailed stats, especially conditional probabilities, seems to support the "liberal" assumptions more. For example, a white person is relatively less likely to get busted for committing the exact same crime as a black person.


Uh that inferior complex is found on the left, by changing standards so that blacks are held to a lower standard in order to get into a college or get a job. I look at people like Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas, etc. heck they all became somebody and they did it by the same standards as a white person would. This talk about Conservatives somehow being racist, is plain stupid. Conservatives demand people take responsibility for themselves, that is totally different than saying someone is inferior or lazy.

Seriously, the more you play the race card, the less credibility you have.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

28 Mar 2011, 1:01 am

I think Colin Powel and Condaleesa Rice are indeed great success stories, but even they'd tell you they had gone up against entrenched racism in their time. And one thing that the right seems to constantly ignore is that there is racism in our country that no amount of hard work will prevail against.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Bataar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,919
Location: Post Falls, ID

28 Mar 2011, 1:48 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
ikorack wrote:
sources?


From an earlier, more polemical, thread I started:

Master_Pedant wrote:
Bataar wrote:
True, actual racisim probably only exists in a small fraction of the population.


41% of Republicans who believe Obama wasn't born in America is a "small fraction of the population"?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40644.html

25% of the population at large doubting that Obama was born in the US is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

52% of Tea Partisans believing that too much is made of problems facing African Americans is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

46% of Tea Partisans - a larger % than voters at large (32%) believing that if blacks only "worked harder" they'd be as well off as whites is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

The fact that 63% of Tea Partisans (compared to 43% of voters in general) disagree with the statement that "We should not single out Muslims or Middle Easterners for airport security stops" is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

And before you try one of these "hey, that ain't racism, that's just a difference of opinion on socioeconomics or ...." remember that the worst and most devastating parts of historical racism weren't always explicit. Much of it was the implicit belief that either the minority groups "didn't have it that bad" or "just happened" to be filled with a large percentage of incompetent people. Ignorance and indifference to the plights in Ghettos is causally related to racist attitudes.

Bataar wrote:
It's a term that gets thrown around so much that it's become almost meaningless. It's to the point where a person can be called racist simply for disagreeing with President Obama on matters of policy.


As ample evidence shows, that is just pure BS. I'm not sure whether you said this out of honest ignorance or deliberate self-deception, but the facts plainly disagree with you. When Jimmy Carter was pointing to race as a factor in fear of Obama's agenda, Obama downplayed the roll of race - so the "overuse of 'racist' label against Obama critics" theme is pretty nonsensical. There's a difference between disagreeing with his policies and doing what the founder of TeaParty.org, Dale Robertson, did.

Again, none of those are racist issues.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

28 Mar 2011, 1:59 am

Bataar wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
ikorack wrote:
sources?


From an earlier, more polemical, thread I started:

Master_Pedant wrote:
Bataar wrote:
True, actual racisim probably only exists in a small fraction of the population.


41% of Republicans who believe Obama wasn't born in America is a "small fraction of the population"?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40644.html

25% of the population at large doubting that Obama was born in the US is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

52% of Tea Partisans believing that too much is made of problems facing African Americans is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

46% of Tea Partisans - a larger % than voters at large (32%) believing that if blacks only "worked harder" they'd be as well off as whites is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

The fact that 63% of Tea Partisans (compared to 43% of voters in general) disagree with the statement that "We should not single out Muslims or Middle Easterners for airport security stops" is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

And before you try one of these "hey, that ain't racism, that's just a difference of opinion on socioeconomics or ...." remember that the worst and most devastating parts of historical racism weren't always explicit. Much of it was the implicit belief that either the minority groups "didn't have it that bad" or "just happened" to be filled with a large percentage of incompetent people. Ignorance and indifference to the plights in Ghettos is causally related to racist attitudes.

Bataar wrote:
It's a term that gets thrown around so much that it's become almost meaningless. It's to the point where a person can be called racist simply for disagreeing with President Obama on matters of policy.


As ample evidence shows, that is just pure BS. I'm not sure whether you said this out of honest ignorance or deliberate self-deception, but the facts plainly disagree with you. When Jimmy Carter was pointing to race as a factor in fear of Obama's agenda, Obama downplayed the roll of race - so the "overuse of 'racist' label against Obama critics" theme is pretty nonsensical. There's a difference between disagreeing with his policies and doing what the founder of TeaParty.org, Dale Robertson, did.

Again, none of those are racist issues.


I suppose in conservative bizzaro land where calling 19th century Irish-American immigrants "disportontionately lazy and amoral" wouldn't be a racial issue, they aren't. But in the real world they are.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Bataar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,919
Location: Post Falls, ID

28 Mar 2011, 2:10 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
Bataar wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
ikorack wrote:
sources?


From an earlier, more polemical, thread I started:

Master_Pedant wrote:
Bataar wrote:
True, actual racisim probably only exists in a small fraction of the population.


41% of Republicans who believe Obama wasn't born in America is a "small fraction of the population"?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40644.html

25% of the population at large doubting that Obama was born in the US is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

52% of Tea Partisans believing that too much is made of problems facing African Americans is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

46% of Tea Partisans - a larger % than voters at large (32%) believing that if blacks only "worked harder" they'd be as well off as whites is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

The fact that 63% of Tea Partisans (compared to 43% of voters in general) disagree with the statement that "We should not single out Muslims or Middle Easterners for airport security stops" is a "small fraction of the population"? (LINK)

And before you try one of these "hey, that ain't racism, that's just a difference of opinion on socioeconomics or ...." remember that the worst and most devastating parts of historical racism weren't always explicit. Much of it was the implicit belief that either the minority groups "didn't have it that bad" or "just happened" to be filled with a large percentage of incompetent people. Ignorance and indifference to the plights in Ghettos is causally related to racist attitudes.

Bataar wrote:
It's a term that gets thrown around so much that it's become almost meaningless. It's to the point where a person can be called racist simply for disagreeing with President Obama on matters of policy.


As ample evidence shows, that is just pure BS. I'm not sure whether you said this out of honest ignorance or deliberate self-deception, but the facts plainly disagree with you. When Jimmy Carter was pointing to race as a factor in fear of Obama's agenda, Obama downplayed the roll of race - so the "overuse of 'racist' label against Obama critics" theme is pretty nonsensical. There's a difference between disagreeing with his policies and doing what the founder of TeaParty.org, Dale Robertson, did.

Again, none of those are racist issues.


I suppose in conservative bizzaro land where calling 19th century Irish-American immigrants "disportontionately lazy and amoral" wouldn't be a racial issue, they aren't. But in the real world they are.

That's not really a racial issue either. Irish-American is not a race for one thing. So a statement like that, while definitely being a negative stereotype, is not racist as it doesn't apply to a race at all, let alone an entire race.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

28 Mar 2011, 3:21 am

Image



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

28 Mar 2011, 3:54 am

That was definitely blatant racism, but I don't see what it has to do with the Tea Party.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Mar 2011, 9:49 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
That was definitely blatant racism, but I don't see what it has to do with the Tea Party.


1. Being Irish is not a race. It is a nationality and an ethnos.

2. It has nothing to do with the Tea Party. There are lots of people of Irish extraction in the Tea Party.

ruveyn



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

28 Mar 2011, 10:29 am

ruveyn wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
That was definitely blatant racism, but I don't see what it has to do with the Tea Party.


1. Being Irish is not a race. It is a nationality and an ethnos.

2. It has nothing to do with the Tea Party. There are lots of people of Irish extraction in the Tea Party.

ruveyn


As usual you miss the point.

1. 19th century Irish were treated as second class people. Whether it is racist or not is moot; the end effect was the same. They were considered lazy and amoral, which obviously isnt true.
2. There would not have been 100 years ago, as they were the minority du jour. Along with Jews, Greeks, Slavs and anyone that had a funny accent.

So who will it be in 100 years?


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

28 Mar 2011, 10:33 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
That was definitely blatant racism, but I don't see what it has to do with the Tea Party.


She was addressing bataars Irish-American comment I think. White is relatively recent generalization of race, not even certain it's universal.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

28 Mar 2011, 10:52 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
I think Colin Powel and Condaleesa Rice are indeed great success stories, but even they'd tell you they had gone up against entrenched racism in their time. And one thing that the right seems to constantly ignore is that there is racism in our country that no amount of hard work will prevail against.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


I would also think they would find it extremely insulting if they were held to a lower standard simply because of their skin color.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

28 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I think Colin Powel and Condaleesa Rice are indeed great success stories, but even they'd tell you they had gone up against entrenched racism in their time. And one thing that the right seems to constantly ignore is that there is racism in our country that no amount of hard work will prevail against.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


I would also think they would find it extremely insulting if they were held to a lower standard simply because of their skin color.


I'm not holding them to a lower standard. I'm saying there are those who will never hire people because they are racial minorities, or will always think the worse of them.
And the "market" doesn't zap these people out of existence, as people like Rand Paul seems to think, because this line of thinking has been with us since time immemorial, and the all knowing, all powerful capitalist system hasn't done anything about them, yet.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm

Fuzzy wrote:

As usual you miss the point.

?


Tojours. I take things as written, not as intended. I have no idea of what anyone intends except myself.

Have you ever considered making your points explicitly instead of relying in implication and hints?

ruveyn



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

28 Mar 2011, 2:01 pm

ikorack wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
That was definitely blatant racism, but I don't see what it has to do with the Tea Party.


She was addressing bataars Irish-American comment I think. White is relatively recent generalization of race, not even certain it's universal.


I didn't realize 'white' was a race. I thought it was Caucasian. As in... on one side of the Caucus mountains.

Either way, Irish are Celtic.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Bataar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,919
Location: Post Falls, ID

28 Mar 2011, 2:23 pm

Orwell wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
I'm not denying there are a lot of racists IN the Tea Party. There certainly are.

However, I do not think racism is the driving factor for the Tea Party stance.

Perhaps not THE driving factor, but it seems to be a significant undercurrent. The Birthers are the ones most obviously driven by racism.

How so? In what way is it even a race issue for anyone to use the possibility that a president they don't like was not born in the U.S. to get him out of office? I guarantee you, that if there had been any question at all that President Bush hadn't been born in the U.S., he would be getting the same flack from the left, if not more so than Obama has received. Would that have been racist?