Case for Obama birth certificate forgery growing....

Page 12 of 18 [ 273 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Jan 2014, 2:19 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
GGPViper wrote:


Um, no.

That has been debunked as a forgery on so many grounds, and I won't rehash it here.

That it was released by the White House and not an impartial 3rd party (e.g., having Hawaii release it to the NYT, for example) means it could have been tampered with, and evidence of tampering was found.

As I said, the White House stunt pushed the burden of proof to get a court order so far back that it's near impossible now to get the courts involved in the debate. Up to that point, the courts might have taken an interest because Obama would not let people have access to the records. He still won't let people access the records....he insists they trust a document that came out of his hands that has evidence of tampering.


Is there any dispute that President Obama's mother was American? If not, then, by virtue of Fox News' ( :hail: ) claim that Mr. Cruz is eligible for the presidency based upon his mother's citizenship, isn't that the signal that it is time for everyone to shut up? I mean, you wouldn't want this issue to get in the way of Ted Cruz's election, would you?



Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

05 Jan 2014, 2:29 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I think the powers that be can figure out how to get a legitimate copy of Obama's birth certificate. You guys are really embarrassing yourselves with this.


Um, the law is clear. NOBODY can just go in and get your birth certificate. It requires a COURT ORDER or your WRITTEN CONSENT.

Obama never granted consent. No court has issued an order mandating production of a certified copy.

This leaves bribing someone to illegally release a copy to the public...and that's not easy to pull off.

For so many people to be complicit in this "cover-up"... there is no way that the truth wouldn't come out. Obama may not be the greatest president the US has ever had, but suggesting he is not a citizen . . . it doesn't bear up.
I know that there are a lot of truths that the general populace will never know about, but I think if someone had proof that he wasn't a citizen they would have presented it.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Jan 2014, 5:14 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Anyway, I find it somewhat amusing that people are still questioning the citizenship of Barack Obama. Last time I checked, he is the *ONLY* US president who has actually provided valid proof of being born in the US.


Even more amusing is the fact that anyone who dares mention anything about Mr. Cruz's birthplace and citizenships is labeled a "T-word."


Sigh...... :roll:
Cruz was born in Calgary in 1970 when his parents lived there temporarily as oil workers. He has lived in the United States since 1974. It wouldn't matter because a senator DOES NOT have to be American born, only a citizen. The president DOES have to be American born. It's actually in the constitution. There would be nothing to make a "birther" case against Cruz.


Except that, his name is coming up as a potential candidate for the Repugnican presidential nomination.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... n/2064395/

And, after all of the birther nonsense against President Obama, the Repugnicans are arguing that Ted Cruz can be president.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05 ... ntial-run/

Quote:
..."the weight of scholarly legal and historical opinion appears to support the notion that 'natural born citizen' means one who is entitled under the Constitution or laws of the United States to U.S. citizenship 'at birth' or 'by birth,' including … those born abroad of one citizen parent who has met U.S. residency requirements."...


The birthers never once said "well, his mother was an American, so even if he was born in Kenya, that's good enough." They've been ranting and raving indecently for years.


:roll: :roll:
1. The presidential election isn't until 2016. Late 2016 at that. This is only VERY early 2014. A bit too soon for hand-wringing, isn't it?
2. It doesnt matter what "Faux Noise" or the "repugnicans" want. If the candidate is not US born he can't serve as president.
3. WTF are you doing reading stuff from Fox, anyway? Me, a hate-filled conservative, rarely reads or listens to Fox.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,239
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Jan 2014, 5:45 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Even if everything you say is true, that's not the point of the thread.


What is the point of this ancient thread then? As far as I can tell, it was only resurrected for trolling purposes.


(Sigh) The point of this ridiculous argument is if the President is legally the President. The whole thread was started as an insult to the commander-in-chief, in support of gullible dullards whose wet dream is about seeing Obama booted from the White House into a ghetto.


Sigh....and if the "Commander in Chief" were a republican under attack you'd be equally appalled?? :roll:


Who says?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Jan 2014, 6:41 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Even if everything you say is true, that's not the point of the thread.


What is the point of this ancient thread then? As far as I can tell, it was only resurrected for trolling purposes.


(Sigh) The point of this ridiculous argument is if the President is legally the President. The whole thread was started as an insult to the commander-in-chief, in support of gullible dullards whose wet dream is about seeing Obama booted from the White House into a ghetto.


Sigh....and if the "Commander in Chief" were a republican under attack you'd be equally appalled?? :roll:


Who says?


I don't think you understood.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,239
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Jan 2014, 6:49 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Even if everything you say is true, that's not the point of the thread.


What is the point of this ancient thread then? As far as I can tell, it was only resurrected for trolling purposes.


(Sigh) The point of this ridiculous argument is if the President is legally the President. The whole thread was started as an insult to the commander-in-chief, in support of gullible dullards whose wet dream is about seeing Obama booted from the White House into a ghetto.


Sigh....and if the "Commander in Chief" were a republican under attack you'd be equally appalled?? :roll:


Who says?


I don't think you understood.


Okay, I must have reinterpreted your post in my head. My proper answer is:

Yes, I like to think I would be.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm

Now, remember, boyz :shameonyou:

Whilst the Repugnican playbook does indeed call for shouting "T-Word!" at every possible opportunity, particularly when one can think of nothing more intelligent to say, which, for some, may be most of the time:

Fox News ( :hail: ) is saying "Shush!" So, you had better "Shush!", or Bill O'Reilly ( :hail: ) himself will be sitting on your face! :shameonyou:



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Jan 2014, 7:38 pm

/\
Ah yes, the T-word: What liberals call conservatives and libertarians when they get pwn3d by them or simply don't agree with them.
BUT, if you call a liberal T out for being a T, that's a "personal attack".


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

05 Jan 2014, 7:42 pm

Oh, for the love of Zod.

"Troll" is not an obscene word on WrongPlanet.

Just don't expect moderators to jump in whenever you invoke it...



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

05 Jan 2014, 7:51 pm

Oh? T-word refers to troll? I thought it referred to Ted Cruz! :D


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Jan 2014, 8:01 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Oh, for the love of Zod.

"Troll" is not an obscene word on WrongPlanet.

Just don't expect moderators to jump in whenever you invoke it...


Well, some of us may have had some experiences in the past....with certain moderators....you're not all of one mind on this.....so, some of us may be trying to tread cautiously....another moderator might jump in at any time and administer floggings....one never knows....



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm

Raptor wrote:
BUT, if you call a liberal T out for being a T, that's a "personal attack".


That's absolutely right! So you had better watch it, Buster! :shameonyou:



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

05 Jan 2014, 8:12 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Oh, for the love of Zod.

"Troll" is not an obscene word on WrongPlanet.

Just don't expect moderators to jump in whenever you invoke it...

Well, some of us may have had some experiences in the past....with certain moderators....you're not all of one mind on this.....so, some of us may be trying to tread cautiously....another moderator might jump in at any time and administer floggings....one never knows....

AP, your concept of cautious is equivalent to dancing Gangnam style in a minefield...

Anyway, the only reason why this thread hasn't been locked due to necromancy is because it has some relevance to a contemporary political figure (Ted Cruz).

If you and Raptor keep spamming your predictable tit-for-tat posting, I will lock the thread.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Jan 2014, 8:33 pm

:hail:



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,239
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Jan 2014, 8:59 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Oh, for the love of Zod.

"Troll" is not an obscene word on WrongPlanet.

Just don't expect moderators to jump in whenever you invoke it...


So, does that mean I can tell someone to go troll themselves? :lol:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm

Anyway, although I did resurrect this thread because of Mr. Cruz, and his situation being in line at least with what had been said about the president, I find it fascinating that the bitterness over President Obama's birth certificate is just as intense as ever. Even after all of these years. The conversation carries on as if President Obama's birth certificate is the freshest topic in the universe.