puddingmouse wrote:
I've talked to plenty.

In what capacity?
puddingmouse wrote:
Being a rapist still carries too much risk compared to buying someone else's body, and besides straight up rape isn't what they usually want.
Of course not. If they did, then they wouldn't be negotiating a price.
puddingmouse wrote:
Buying someone's body is usually what they specifically want.
Yes--or just renting for a bit.
puddingmouse wrote:
Simply buying an orgasm isn't the same as buying someone to service you.
Who would pay for an orgasm without paying for the time and expertise of an executive ejaculatory assistant?
puddingmouse wrote:
They don't want to use physical force to make people do what they otherwise wouldn't,
Of course not. That would be terrible.
puddingmouse wrote:
they'd rather wield the power of their money.
Like all consumers.
puddingmouse wrote:
A sub would be getting sexual pleasure out of it, and they don't really want their partner to have that. It's too mutual. They want it to be a cold business exchange for bodies. They want someone else to act like a sex robot - they don't want an actual sex robot.
What do you mean by "sub?" I think that most customers would not object to the executive ejaculatory assistant enjoying her work, and would prefer that she at least pretended.