Page 12 of 14 [ 211 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

10 Jan 2014, 2:27 am

LKL wrote:
This is not correct. I backpack regularly, and the pack rests on the hips, not the back and shoulders. You pick it up with your legs and you move it forward with your legs, not with your back and arms. This is true for men as well as women.
http://www.rei.com/features/infographic ... aphic.html
If our "leathernecks" are carrying weight on their backs and shoulders, they are suffering from poor design and setting themselves up for back problems that will not be beneficial to their fighting readiness.


Backpacking is not the same as carrying a soldier's gear; the body armor alone often tops 20 lbs, which is carried entirely on the shoulders, and depending upon the role you could be talking anywhere from 7-20 lbs of gun (they like to hang a lot of extra stuff on them these days), on top of all the gear carried in the rucksack.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 166
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

10 Jan 2014, 2:34 am

^ Yup. By all means, I think women are capable of doing excellent in a variety of active combat roles...

...just not as grunts. They'd be honestly terrible at it, I hate to say it. Stick a bad b***h in Bradley, however...



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

10 Jan 2014, 3:16 am

I will grant that I wasn't thinking about body armor, but women carry around babies all the time that way as much or more than a gun.
Wrt. tests of lower body strength as proportional to body weight (not total lower body strength, which the average man will beat the average woman at; I specify the proportion, because it's the upper body strength/weight proportion that precludes women from doing pull-ups, not total upper body strength):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSrW_Ju0VSs
Men are likely to be at a disadvantage as compared to women when moving in a crouch, because they are proportionately top-heavy.

wrt the link, here's an alternative:
http://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/ ... g-fit.html



Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 166
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

10 Jan 2014, 4:16 am

LKL wrote:
I will grant that I wasn't thinking about body armor, but women carry around babies all the time that way as much or more than a gun.


Carrying a baby around and wielding a weapon in battle are not even remotely comparable.

Quote:
Wrt. tests of lower body strength as proportional to body weight (not total lower body strength, which the average man will beat the average woman at; I specify the proportion, because it's the upper body strength/weight proportion that precludes women from doing pull-ups, not total upper body strength):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSrW_Ju0VSs


Interesting enough, but at the end of the day it has to be applicable to combat-related activities. If it's not then who cares?

Quote:
Men are likely to be at a disadvantage as compared to women when moving in a crouch, because they are proportionately top-heavy.


If you can cite this with some kind of empirical evidence, I'd be interested in seeing it. However, I've actually known and talked to real soldiers who have real combat experience, and they can tell you that even humping it for a few hours leaves your entire body feeling sore, including the shoulders and traps. Once again, civilian backpacking isn't remotely comparable to a military march.

This apparently becomes an even BIGGER issue once the fighting starts, especially if you're swinging a 7+ kilogram weapon around.



sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

10 Jan 2014, 5:28 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNzxdxTM5UI[/youtube]


The "Donglegate" issue where a man was sacked due to the actions of Adria Richards at PyCon reveals a stark problem with "women in technology" which few are willing to discuss. Female behavior in the work environment is too often toxic. Similarly, male behavior enables this toxicity to occur, and is too often stupid.


_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series


sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

10 Jan 2014, 9:38 pm

"An examination of the unsupportable claims made by the charities Women's Aid and Refuge and by agencies in the US, that pregnant women are at greater risk from domestic violence.

• Violence Against Women Act - VAWA (US)
• The technique of sub-categorising statistics to mislead the public"


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSKzl9lboCE[/youtube]


_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: USA

11 Jan 2014, 2:41 am

LKL wrote:
Sephardic male, do you really want to get into a 'bad behavior' story contest? I guarantee that I'd win.

Wrt. female marines not being able to do pull-ups: on the one hand, I think that women should be allowed into any position which they are qualified for; on the other, pull-ups specifically test one's upper body strength in proportion to one's body weight. If the testing had originally been designed for women, instead of originally designed for men, the test would be lower body strength in proportion to body weight, and it would be the men who couldn't pass. Maybe they should substitute the 'pick up a chair against the wall' test, with the same number of lifts required as males are required to do pull-ups. :p


Think I must have a feminine build, pretty sure I've got more lower body strength than I've got upper body strength.


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

11 Jan 2014, 3:23 am

Shau wrote:
LKL wrote:
I will grant that I wasn't thinking about body armor, but women carry around babies all the time that way as much or more than a gun.

Carrying a baby around and wielding a weapon in battle are not even remotely comparable.

They are if you're saying 'a woman doesn't have the strength to carry a 20 lb object.'

Quote:
Quote:
Wrt. tests of lower body strength as proportional to body weight (not total lower body strength, which the average man will beat the average woman at; I specify the proportion, because it's the upper body strength/weight proportion that precludes women from doing pull-ups, not total upper body strength):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSrW_Ju0VSs

Interesting enough, but at the end of the day it has to be applicable to combat-related activities. If it's not then who cares?
Quote:
Men are likely to be at a disadvantage as compared to women when moving in a crouch, because they are proportionately top-heavy.

If you can cite this with some kind of empirical evidence...

Do you not get that it's just been demonstrated? Women have a lower center of gravity. Lower center of gravity = better balance when moving (or trying to pick something up) from a crouched or bent position.
Quote:
...even humping it for a few hours leaves your entire body feeling sore, including the shoulders and traps. Once again, civilian backpacking isn't remotely comparable to a military march.

Oh, I absolutely agree with that. I just don't think that the difference there is gender-specific.

Something that I was thinking about yesterday afternoon, which I realized that I'd forgotten to mention and should: where upper body strength does make a dramatic difference is hitting and throwing: i.e., primitive hand-to-hand combat. For every extra little bit of arm/shoulder strength a man has, a woman has to be that much more skilled of a fighter than he is in order to come out equal.

Not sure how important that is if you only pick tall, strong women and they're fighting against 5-foot tall, malnourished tribesmen, though.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

11 Jan 2014, 3:25 am

sephardic-male wrote:
The "Donglegate" issue where a man was sacked due to the actions of Adria Richards at PyCon reveals a stark problem with "women in technology" which few are willing to discuss. Female behavior in the work environment is too often toxic. Similarly, male behavior enables this toxicity to occur, and is too often stupid.

Honey, those guys weren't sacked because of Adria Richards' actions, they were sacked because she reported their actions. Grow a little hair on your gonads and own up when it's your own gender's responsibility.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

11 Jan 2014, 3:26 am

Ganondox wrote:
LKL wrote:
Sephardic male, do you really want to get into a 'bad behavior' story contest? I guarantee that I'd win.

Wrt. female marines not being able to do pull-ups: on the one hand, I think that women should be allowed into any position which they are qualified for; on the other, pull-ups specifically test one's upper body strength in proportion to one's body weight. If the testing had originally been designed for women, instead of originally designed for men, the test would be lower body strength in proportion to body weight, and it would be the men who couldn't pass. Maybe they should substitute the 'pick up a chair against the wall' test, with the same number of lifts required as males are required to do pull-ups. :p


Think I must have a feminine build, pretty sure I've got more lower body strength than I've got upper body strength.

most people do. Men have proportionately more upper-body strength than women of the same height, though, and have higher centers of gravity.



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

11 Jan 2014, 4:06 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7TOzHr6jXk[/youtube]This is how the patriarchy works these are the leaders of the Patriarchy! They are noticing the effects of feminism bringing hope and such! The leader gave a suggestion that's been going on since the dawn of humanity!


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 166
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

11 Jan 2014, 6:07 am

LKL wrote:
They are if you're saying 'a woman doesn't have the strength to carry a 20 lb object.'


The thing is, you don't usually go charging around a battlefield with a baby.

Quote:
Do you not get that it's just been demonstrated? Women have a lower center of gravity. Lower center of gravity = better balance when moving (or trying to pick something up) from a crouched or bent position.


A youtube video isn't convincing enough for me. Preferably you'd show me a rigorously-conducted, peer-reviewed study on the topic, but I'd be willing to accept less. Got anything better than a youtube video? You're talking to a scientist, as it were. We have rather high standards of evidence.

The main thing that's bugging the back of my head about this is that the IDF, protecting a country that is literally surrounded on all sides by enemies that hate them and would stop at nothing to see them driven into the sea, has made great forays into allowing women into combat. If women really had a significant advantage in this area for the reasons you've stated, the IDF of all countries in the world would be the ones willing to give their female troopers an earnest shot at proving themselves.

The fact that the IDF doesn't have scores of female grunts running around suggests to me that it's ultimately physical rather than sexist reasons. That said...they DO have scores of women running around as pilots, snipers, combat medics, etc. I get the feeling the reason is because those are the roles women are more than capable of excelling at.

Quote:
Oh, I absolutely agree with that. I just don't think that the difference there is gender-specific.


I think it is, because in addition to lower back and leg strength, you also need ample amounts of arm, shoulder, and trap strength for a military march, on TOP of needing those muscles to endure the rigors of combat.

Quote:
Something that I was thinking about yesterday afternoon, which I realized that I'd forgotten to mention and should: where upper body strength does make a dramatic difference is hitting and throwing: i.e., primitive hand-to-hand combat. For every extra little bit of arm/shoulder strength a man has, a woman has to be that much more skilled of a fighter than he is in order to come out equal.


Fortunately for women in this case, hand to hand combat isn't incredibly common in modern warfare.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

11 Jan 2014, 6:21 am

LKL wrote:
Honey, those guys weren't sacked because of Adria Richards' actions, they were sacked because she reported their actions.


So, do you think it was appropriate for those men to be fired for making that joke in that context? I think the point is that most reasonable people do not think that was justified.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

11 Jan 2014, 7:25 am

Dox47 wrote:
LKL wrote:
Honey, those guys weren't sacked because of Adria Richards' actions, they were sacked because she reported their actions.

So, do you think it was appropriate for those men to be fired for making that joke in that context? I think the point is that most reasonable people do not think that was justified.

Ahem.

2 individuals were fired in the so-called "Donglegate" - Where do they find these labels? :roll:

The first was an (unnamed) employee of Playhaven. He was fired for making inappropriate comments at PyCon.
http://blog.playhaven.com/addressing-pycon/

The second was Adria Richards herself, an employee of Sendgrid. She was fired for failing to to do her job (instead of uniting the developer community - which was her job function - she divided it instead).
http://sendgrid.com/blog/a-difficult-situation/

Anyway, some back-story on Adria Richards. Apparently, she is a repeat take-offender. No wonder she got fired.
http://amandablumwords.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/3/



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

11 Jan 2014, 8:01 am

Image


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

11 Jan 2014, 8:51 am

AspieOtaku wrote:
Dont forget snipers!


[img][546:800]http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2013/100/a/5/yoko_littner_cosplay_by_aliceblacfox-d6138wt.jpg[/img]