Page 12 of 17 [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 17  Next


Are religions unfair to women?
Yes 75%  75%  [ 43 ]
No 25%  25%  [ 14 ]
Total votes : 57

Atom1966
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 272
Location: Sombrero Galaxy

20 Feb 2014, 11:36 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Submissive women? Thats bull sh**


You didn't snort. Your post doesn't count.

Image

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYX_j9828Rc[/youtube]



Oh dear.
We may have aspergers but the woman in this video is a total lunatic, which ofcourse means that she is worse off than us. I didn't even know that people like that still exist, christ! Oops, excusez le mot.



Atom1966
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 272
Location: Sombrero Galaxy

20 Feb 2014, 11:56 pm

AspieOtaku wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Here is Mrs. Hagee

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaIF7sLWOzI[/youtube]

I wonder why she isn't wearing a hat? There are men in the audience! Such an ABOMINATION!! ! **SNOOOORRRRTTTTT!! !!**
...............................................................................................................................*SNORT*


Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo.
Yet another zealous looney.

When ignorance reigns life is lost.
Remember those words when you are listening to this woman.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

21 Feb 2014, 10:34 am

Well, if these women like to be submissive to their husbands, then there's nothing wrong with that.

Old Aphorism wrote:
Behind every successful man there is a woman.


You never hear this one any more, but having a supportive/submissive wife may give a man an edge in the professional world.

It sure beats being married to a henpecker or a nagger.

Groucho Marx took this concept one step further:
Groucho Marx wrote:
Behind every successful man is a woman. Behind her is his wife.



*SNORT* Image *SNORT*



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

21 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm

Atom1966 wrote:
Buddhism has patriarchal aspects to it that are discirminatory against woman.

How does Buddhism discriminate against women?

Quote:
Not to mention the fact that the Buddha himself is male as well ofcourse.

Well, that doesn't mean that he was bad.


Atom1966 wrote:
Tolerance, free thinking and open mindedness in general are aspects I don't immediately associate with religion.

I thought that Buddhism was about tolerance, free thinking and open-mindedness?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Nn5uqE3C9w[/youtube]



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

21 Feb 2014, 12:08 pm

Well, okay.

http://buddhism.about.com/od/becomingab ... sexism.htm

Quote:
....As told in "The First Buddhist Women," the Buddha originally refused to ordain women as nuns. He said that allowing women into the sangha would cause his teachings to survive only half as long –- 500 years instead of a 1,000.

The Buddha's cousin Ananda asked if there was any reason women could not realize enlightenment and enter Nirvana as well as men. The Buddha admitted there was no reason a woman could not be enlightened. "Women, Ananda, having gone forth are able to realize the fruit of stream-attainment or the fruit of once-returning or the fruit of non-returning or arahantship," he said.

Unequal Rules for Nuns

The Vinaya-pitaka section of the Tripitaka (Pali Canon) records the original rules of discipline for monks and nuns. A bhikkuni (nun) has rules in addition to those given to a bhikku (monk). These include subordination to monks; the most senior nuns are to be considered "junior" to a monk of one day.

Some scholars point to discrepancies between the Pali Bhikkuni Vinaya (the section of the Pali Canon dealing with the rules for nuns) and other versions of the texts, and suggest the more odious rules were added after the Buddha's death. Wherever they came from, over the centuries the rules were used in many parts of Asia to discourage women from being ordained.

When the orders of nuns died out in India and Sri Lanka centuries ago, conservatives used the rules that called for monks and nuns to be present at nuns’ ordination to prevent the institution of new orders. Only recently has the ordination problem been solved by allowing properly ordained nuns from other parts of Asia to travel to ordination ceremonies. However, the establishment of nuns' orders in Tibet, where there had been no nuns before, for some time met with resistance. Even today, in some parts of Asia nuns receive less education and financial support than monks....

...the Larger Sukhavati-vyuha Sutra, also called the Aparimitayur Sutra, is one of three sutras that provide the doctrinal basis of the Pure Land school. This sutra contains a passage usually interpreted to mean that women must be reborn as men before they can enter Nirvana.

On the other hand, the Vimilakirti Sutra teaches that maleness and femaleness, like other phenomenal distinctions, are essentially unreal. "With this in mind, the Buddha said, ’In all things, there is neither male nor female.’" The Vimilakirti is an essential text in several Mahayana schools, including Tibetan and Zen Buddhism....

...Today, Buddhist women in the West generally consider institutional sexism to be vestiges of Asian culture that can be surgically excised from dharma. Some western monastic orders are co-ed, with men and women following the same rules....


A bit of a mixture, there. At least Western Buddhists seem fairer to women.



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

21 Feb 2014, 12:11 pm

Atom1966 wrote:
I think that most religions are extremely patriarchal and mysoginous.


^while I agree with this in general . . .

Atom1966 wrote:
That is one of the reasons why I have a bit of a problem with them. An example of that mysogynie is the fact that all of the most important religious figures are male. From Jesus to Mohammed. I have had an on and off interest in Buddhism as a way of life for a relatively long time but even Buddhism has patriarchal aspects to it that are discirminatory against woman. Not to mention the fact that the Buddha himself is male as well ofcourse.


^. . . I do take issue with this statement. Just because someone is a male does not mean that they are a misogynist. Yes, it is easier for the religion to be used that way if the founder was a male, but that does mean that the religion is misogynistic because the founder was male.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

21 Feb 2014, 2:54 pm

The next Dalai Lama might be a woman

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on- ... e-a-woman/

Quote:
Late last week, the Dalai Lama said during a visit to Australia that the next Dalai Lama could very well be a woman. In speaking to reporters about how the world needs more compassionate leaders today, he said that “biologically, females have more potential…females have more sensitivity about others’ well being.” As a result, he said, “if the circumstances are such that a female Dalai Lama is more useful, then automatically a female Dalai Lama will come.”


I wonder when the Catholics will have their first female pope?



AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 76,360
Location: Portland, Oregon

21 Feb 2014, 3:06 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:

I wonder when the Catholics will have their first female pope?


Even though I'm a Catholic who supports the notion of a female Pope, I think conservative Catholics will throw hissy fits if the Vatican tries to change their policies on female priests, because I think in order to have a female Pope, the Catholic Church should first have female priests.


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

21 Feb 2014, 5:06 pm

*SNOOOOORT!*[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZoTn_hxAMc[/youtube]


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


Feralucce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,143
Location: New Orleans, LA

21 Feb 2014, 10:12 pm

AspieOtaku wrote:
*SNOOOOORT!*[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZoTn_hxAMc[/youtube]

Yeah... that... was kind of offensive all the way around


_________________
Yeah. I'm done. Don't bother messaging and expecting a response - i've left WP permanently.


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

21 Feb 2014, 11:03 pm

Well, missionaries did go around the world to proclaim the word that women had to cover up their titties. So, of course that's unfair to women. And, unfair to men, too, given the lengths that we have to go to just to behold a pair.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

21 Feb 2014, 11:19 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Well, missionaries did go around the world to proclaim the word that women had to cover up their titties. So, of course that's unfair to women. And, unfair to men, too, given the lengths that we have to go to just to behold a pair.

Speak for yourself! :lol: That's the one privilege I'm almost NEVER denied.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Feb 2014, 7:44 am

AngelRho wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Well, missionaries did go around the world to proclaim the word that women had to cover up their titties. So, of course that's unfair to women. And, unfair to men, too, given the lengths that we have to go to just to behold a pair.

Speak for yourself! :lol: That's the one privilege I'm almost NEVER denied.


So, in your church, the women have to show their titties? That's one way of increasing attendance.

If the female choir members have to sing while nude, then the women won't have to nag their husbands at all to get ready for church cum Sunday morning. The men will be all dressed up, and sitting in the car waiting.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Feb 2014, 11:21 am

Gosh. I found a YouTube video of one of your church services. 8O

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLN3TJJIHl0



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

22 Feb 2014, 11:52 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Well, missionaries did go around the world to proclaim the word that women had to cover up their titties. So, of course that's unfair to women. And, unfair to men, too, given the lengths that we have to go to just to behold a pair.

Speak for yourself! :lol: That's the one privilege I'm almost NEVER denied.


So, in your church, the women have to show their titties? That's one way of increasing attendance.

If the female choir members have to sing while nude, then the women won't have to nag their husbands at all to get ready for church cum Sunday morning. The men will be all dressed up, and sitting in the car waiting.

What does church have to do with anything? Some women are willing to privately share in some ways more than in other ways. If you're having trouble finding a woman willing to bare her chest for you, that's a personal problem you have that I don't.

We should take it easy with the b00b!3/p3n!$ talk, btw…mods are watching. ;)



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

22 Feb 2014, 12:27 pm

AngelRho wrote:
What does church have to do with anything?


This is a "religion" topic. :shameonyou: