jrjones9933 wrote:
It's so amusing when people act like they have my best interests at heart in the middle of a barrage of irrational hostility. The crew would be the people you keep seeing next to you when you all pile on, in every case. I also find it amusing that you expect to deny the existence of what anyone can see.
Just because more than one person finds you to be....how to say this without running afoul of the TOS....a nuisance. There, that's not
too offensive I guess. Anyhoo, that doesnt amount to a crew it's just that more than one person finds you to be a nuisance. Besides, one of the mods is in your corner because others include me were accused of forming a coalition against you. [/quote]
Quote:
Back to guns. One thing rational gun owners can do to improve the situation under current law is buy the most technologically advanced pistols available. The safety features make it possible to store them loaded and ready to go in a convenient location, knowing that if a kid got his hands on it, it would be no more dangerous than a brick.
I can't see very many manufacturers making a gun like that since it won't sell very well, except for a comparative few numbskulls. It's a solution to a non-existing problem. Most "rational" shooters including me don't even like magazine disconnect safeties, loaded chamber indicators, internal locking devices, or safeties on striker fired handguns. They are all BS features that cannot take the place of safe gun handling.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson