Is their a Leftist Agenda in Academia?
Anyways so I come from a city which is extremely liberal and joined up with the Model United Nations for the youth. I met some interesting people there, many both right and left wing. I was Somalia and Chad, which was fun.
As part of an event we watched a panel of a professor, a lawyer and a lecturer. They were their to offer perspectives on globalization. However all of them were left leaning, praising diversity as being great and the way of the future.
It eventually came for us to ask questions and my one was picked first. I was in a room of 200 people and sounded sort of anxious as a result and asked this "In France you have an Arab Muslim population which is struggling to integrate. The unemployment is 20% for them. People like Marine Le Pen are gaining in support. Do the French people who back her have a legitimate grievance against them due to the increase in terror attacks and people lashing out?"
I didn't phrase it well. I probably should have said "Understandable concerns" instead of "Legitimate Grievances." But that does not excuse their response, they said in response they got upset and said "No these people do not have legitimate grievances and populists like Marine Le Pen should not be listened to." One of them simply didn't answer.
I felt a little like in this instance as though this panel was spreading their viewpoint onto many people without showing them the other side. This is bad as it prevents people from making an informed judgement, but what's more scary is that they did not bother to understand the other side.
Is their a level of left wing dominance in academia in many places and if so how do we fight it?
No there isn't.
...the vast majority of the attacks carried out in France have been by French-born citizens, not immigrants, who in most cases have been radicalised in French prisons, not in mosques. Does Le Pen have an answer for this?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ron-le-pen
How a Social Justice Mob Fired a Tenured Professor
The fall semester is off to a fiery start. We have Brown University’s decision to distance itself from Professor Lisa Littman’s research paper; the decision by the New York Journal of Mathematics journal to un-publish Professor Theodore Hill’s study; the University of Chicago’s refusal to defend Professor Rachel Fulton Brown from scurrilous attack led by a Brandeis professor; and the rush to give NYU Professor Avital Ronell a free pass for having harassed and sexually assaulted a gay graduate student.
These four cases have received a fair amount of attention—to the degree that I can name them without having to explain the details. For those who need a prompt to keep the cases in mind:
--Littman showed that some teenagers’ claims to trans-sexuality were likely influenced by the desire to win popularity with their in-groups.
--Hill offered a mathematical model to explain why males are so much more variable than females.
--Brown believes medieval studies should focus on medieval Europe, an opinion which her critics say makes her a racist.
--Ronell is a celebrated leftist literary theorist, which her defenders say absolves her culpability in her sexual exploitation of her former graduate student.
Political correctness continues to explore new frontiers. The common theme in these four cases is the supreme confidence of the academic left. It quashes any views it dislikes without a moment’s hesitation and feels little call to explain or justify its actions. Rather, it relies on the readiness of the academy at large to applaud the effort to keep thinkers-of-dangerous-thoughts in their cages.
--Littman’s dangerous thought is that some self-identified trans-sexual individuals may not have been “born that way.”
--Hill’s dangerous thought is that male virtuosity in some intellectual realms might have a biological basis.
--Brown’s dangerous thought is that Western civilization has a legitimate claim to attention in its own right.
--Ronell’s accuser, Nimrod Reitman, offered the dangerous thought that a feminist icon could also be a sexual predator.
https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2018/0 ... professor/
_________________
There Are Four Lights!
The market steps in and makes a correction. As they say, "Get Woke, Go Broke."
Evergreen State sees 'catastrophic' drop in enrollment after social justice meltdown
Evergreen State College enrollment plummeted after fallout from the controversial “Day of Absence” in May 2017 when all white people were asked to leave the campus.
The publicly funded college – committed to social justice – became the poster child of a campus overrun by hyper-political correctness when students shut down the campus and shouted down then-evolutionary biology professor Bret Weinstein for merely questioning the event kicking white people off campus.
Weinstein, who describes himself as “deeply progressive,” ultimately lost his job and was labeled a “racist” and “white supremacist.”
Although just estimates, a representative from Evergreen said they expect around 350 freshman this fall, with a total of 3,000-3,100 total enrollment, both of which “do represent significant decreases as compared to before the 2017 unrest.”
“It’s a catastrophic drop, but I’m hoping we’ll recover,” Evergreen Professor Mike Paros told Fox News.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/12/ev ... tdown.html
_________________
There Are Four Lights!
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,691
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
This is an interview from July with a student from Evergreen. I think what becomes clear is that they're sort of anarchistic model of education (ie. let the students and teachers hash it all out without much top-down from admin) set things on course, and obviously things did get worse with a lot of help from the president.
What this maybe shows in microcosm is just how difficult it is to do society, just how much everyone has to eat it to varying degrees when accepting to live in a society, but when you then try to have as much inclusion and freedom for everyone it seems like someone, somewhere, will be able to make a persuasive claim on why they should be able to establish a tyrrany over everyone else - and in that sort of environment people for whatever reason don't have the social or internal resource/mechanisms to say no or when a critical boundary has been crossed between a reasonable request vs 'I've been through x therefor I'll be the law here'.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
Colleges and universities have stood as bastions of free speech, the exchange of ideas and the civil debate of opposing viewpoints since the beginning.
Never in my lifetime did I think I would see a widespread movement on the same campuses to stifle and crush free speech.
And you don't now. The right doesn't believe in free speech at all. They use it as a weapon against college students, who they perceive as an enemy, that's why they also suppress their vote. So spare me your disingenuous hand wringing. Free speech means the right to protest.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
Free Speech is the right to express yourself in most ways without facing legal consequences. It has nothing to do with any other negative consequence.
The issue is freedom of expression/censorship. As far as sexuality, art there is a lot more freedom of expression today. What is bieng curtailed is language and certain opinions deemed offensive/racist etc. What has changed on campus(and in influential companies such as Google) is that what is deemed offensive has greatly expanded as has the consequences for expressing views deemed offensive.
I did graduate from college almost 40 years ago and the prevailing political view was “liberal”. It did inform to a degree course structure. But censorship was an anathema, speech codes/banning was something studied in history or political science courses.
Is a speech code at a public university a first amendment violation?
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Free speech only protects one against government interference. It doesn't protect against counter speech. In the past we didn't get right wing Nazi provocateurs aiming to discredit universities by using free speech as a weapon. Check out what Richard Spencer said:
Conte asked Spencer, “Are we even pro-free speech?”
“No, of course not,” Spencer said. “But we have to use this platform in order—“
“So, we’re being radically honest, here?” Conte asked.
“Yes, radically pragmatic,” Spencer replied.
----
And that describes the conservative movement in general. They kick supporters out of Trump rallies for having the wrong facial expression (plaid shirt guy).
I was born in '60, my father got his PhD Educational Admin degree from the University of Oregon in 1969. I can tell you from personal experience as someone who grew up in that ideological cesspit that there has been a leftist lean in the Edu system deeper and for longer than most (even Limbaugh) would think. Whether there is a left lean to the system is rather beyond debate. As to what to do to avoid it, try to avoid state funded colleges and universities. If the NEA has their hands in it, it's corrupted all the way from university to preschool.
_________________
No, the name isn't my own. It's a joke based on the Sherlock Holmes books.
Conte asked Spencer, “Are we even pro-free speech?”
“No, of course not,” Spencer said. “But we have to use this platform in order—“
“So, we’re being radically honest, here?” Conte asked.
“Yes, radically pragmatic,” Spencer replied.
----
And that describes the conservative movement in general. They kick supporters out of Trump rallies for having the wrong facial expression (plaid shirt guy).
This is one of the biggest issues - they don’t know nor understand what is actually in the constitution. A site tweeted the Declaration of Independence and that even triggered Trump’s supporters since they didn’t know it was the Declaration of Independence. It aligns with them having little education and being “low information voters.”
Go start your own right-wing school and stop your *tching.
Same with movies. They complain, b**ch, and moan that their right-wing movies aren’t getting made (whatever the hell those are - there’s pro war and pro religion movies, so I can only guess anti-minority propaganda?).
Whatever it is, all they do is complain rather than trying to make something. My best guess it’s failed people who are desperately searching for any reason they can think of as per why Hollywood wants nothing to do with them. If there was an anti-Conservative Hollywood conspiracy, Mel Gibson wouldn’t be one of most powerful directors in Hollywood.
All these “conspiracy theories” reek of is a desperate need to find something to cling onto to sleep well at night.
Go start your own right-wing school and stop your *tching.
Same with movies. They complain, b**ch, and moan that their right-wing movies aren’t getting made (whatever the hell those are - there’s pro war and pro religion movies, so I can only guess anti-minority propaganda?).
Whatever it is, all they do is complain rather than trying to make something. My best guess it’s failed people who are desperately searching for any reason they can think of as per why Hollywood wants nothing to do with them. If there was an anti-Conservative Hollywood conspiracy, Mel Gibson wouldn’t be one of most powerful directors in Hollywood.
All these “conspiracy theories” reek of is a desperate need to find something to cling onto to sleep well at night.
College kids with their panties in a bunch about having to take a "gender studies" class.
Is it South Africa in the 1950s, or the USA in 2018?
University offers whites-only meetings to help staff, students ‘work toward white consciousness’
A series of whites-only events happening this fall at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte looks to help white staff members and students at that university “work toward white consciousness” and develop “anti-racist practice.”
The program, called “White Consciousness Conversations,” is meant for both white staff members and students at the university “who are interested in engaging in conversations to assist in their understanding of Whiteness.”
“Understanding white privilege and engaging in anti-racist practice is crucial in creating racial equity,” the event listings declare. “Come join in conversation with IEE staff as we work toward white consciousness.” IEE refers to the school’s Office of Identity, Equity and Engagement....
Another public university was in the news recently for hosting a whites-only discussion group. The University of Maryland offered its students a program through its counseling center called “White Awake” that was meant as “a safe space for White students to explore their experiences, questions, reactions, and feelings.”
https://www.thecollegefix.com/whites-on ... ciousness/
_________________
There Are Four Lights!
University offers whites-only meetings to help staff, students ‘work toward white consciousness’
A series of whites-only events happening this fall at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte looks to help white staff members and students at that university “work toward white consciousness” and develop “anti-racist practice.”
The program, called “White Consciousness Conversations,” is meant for both white staff members and students at the university “who are interested in engaging in conversations to assist in their understanding of Whiteness.”
“Understanding white privilege and engaging in anti-racist practice is crucial in creating racial equity,” the event listings declare. “Come join in conversation with IEE staff as we work toward white consciousness.” IEE refers to the school’s Office of Identity, Equity and Engagement....
Another public university was in the news recently for hosting a whites-only discussion group. The University of Maryland offered its students a program through its counseling center called “White Awake” that was meant as “a safe space for White students to explore their experiences, questions, reactions, and feelings.”
https://www.thecollegefix.com/whites-on ... ciousness/
How come other races are allowed to meet based on race? They are just doing what black folks, and other races do, but now OMG! they are racist?
How come nobody is accusing the black student union of racism?
Oh wait, supposedly ONLY white people are racist.... that's rubbish.
