Could Anne Coulter be an Aspie?
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
I knew about that nutcase, Erik Rudolph (I believe he was also a white nationalist), but I sadly didn't know anything about those other acts of homophobic terrorism.
Bible Belters tend to either deny or are ignorant about those incidents. The ones who've been brainwashed by mainstream Christianity (There is a difference between mainstream Christianity and spiritual Christianity) just believe there can be no violence in the name of Christianity at all while the ones who just call themselves Christian because they just want a cheap and easy ticket to Heaven will say "Huh? Really? Well, I am glad! Those fa***ts deserved it!" because they are bullies just like the perpetrators. What's really hypocritical of them is that they call sex between men "sick" but yet they want to engage in anal sex with women.
I think you and I tend to use the term "mainstream Christianity" differently. I'm using it to describe moderate Christian denominations, as opposed to right wing evangelicals. Then again, here in my part of the country, the Pacific Northwest where religiosity isn't particularly powerful, what is considered mainstream Christian belief is probably different from the Bible Belt.

We live in different cultures so it's no surprise we have different views on what mainstream Christianity is. Mainstream Christianity in the Bible Belt is mostly Southern Baptist which tends to align itself with the Republican Party. Baptists are a textbook case of reverse psychology. They preach against pre-marital sex but have the highest rates of sex before marriage, teen pregnancy, and adultery in the nation. They preach about the evils of drinking and smoking but there are so many dive bars around here that if you throw a stone, you'll never miss hitting one. They say they are all about love but will condemn LGBT people, people of different faiths even if some of those people are of another branch of Christianity, and, to a lesser but growing extent, non-white people or even white people who are Wiccan or Pagan.
I can see how regional culture would cause a difference in semantics.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
ASPartOfMe
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,088
Location: Long Island, New York
12 pages of opining about pretty much everything but her neurology.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
Leftists are Democrats. Because they sit on the left side of Congress.That is where the term derives. JWB was not a liberal, but he was a leftist. Same deal. I acutally consider Lincoln's assasination a war crime, since fighting was still going during the time he was shot. Futhermore, Lincoln himself was not an abolitionist. That is a liberal lie. He wanted to get rid of the blacks in America and ship them back to Africa. That was his main course of action, had he not been shot. Lee Harvey Oswald was definitely a communist. He had been over in Russia and married a Russian. He didn't want JFK to interfere with communist Russia and he was upset about the Bay of Pigs.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
Leftists are Democrats. Because they sit on the left side of Congress.That is where the term derives. JWB was not a liberal, but he was a leftist. Same deal. I acutally consider Lincoln's assasination a war crime, since fighting was still going during the time he was shot. Futhermore, Lincoln himself was not an abolitionist. That is a liberal lie. He wanted to get rid of the blacks in America and ship them back to Africa. That was his main course of action, had he not been shot. Lee Harvey Oswald was definitely a communist. He had been over in Russia and married a Russian. He didn't want JFK to interfere with communist Russia and he was upset about the Bay of Pigs.
If Boothe was a leftist, then so were Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis.
No Lincoln had not been an abolitionist - originally. But he was definitely a free soiler, in that he wanted to surround the slave states with free states to put an economic stranglehold on plantation owners, so they wouldn't be able to move further west once the cotton depleted the soil of all nutrients, thereby causing slavery to slowly die. But Lincoln changed during the war, finally realizing at the end of his life that blacks had every right to stay in America as Americans.
Yes, Oswald defected to Russia, where he married his wife, Marina. It's also true, at the very same time, other marines had defected to the Soviet Union who claimed to be communists but were actually undercover agents. I'm not saying Oswald was one of these, but it's more than a little suspicious that he was able to return to America after a few years, with his wife, a thing almost unheard of during the Cold War - - especially since Oswald had renounced his American citizenship. If Oswald had been an agent at one time, I'm not saying he was still one by November 11, 1963, but it does mean he wasn't what he publically had been painted to be. Then there were his associations he maintained after returning to America, especially with right wing fanatics in the Anti-Castro underground in New Orleans with ties to both the CIA and organized crime that Oswald had been discovered to have had, which were rather contradictory for a communist to have. Oswald is an enigma. Most of the conspiracy theorists probably have it wrong, but I also think the Warren Commision also got it wrong.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
And hardcore conservatives who call liberals "liberals", "commies", "moonbats", and "queers" aren't intolerant? Both sides have their extremes that sicken me but hardcore conservatives often ignore their own.
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
Leftists are Democrats. Because they sit on the left side of Congress.That is where the term derives. JWB was not a liberal, but he was a leftist. Same deal. I acutally consider Lincoln's assasination a war crime, since fighting was still going during the time he was shot. Futhermore, Lincoln himself was not an abolitionist. That is a liberal lie. He wanted to get rid of the blacks in America and ship them back to Africa. That was his main course of action, had he not been shot. Lee Harvey Oswald was definitely a communist. He had been over in Russia and married a Russian. He didn't want JFK to interfere with communist Russia and he was upset about the Bay of Pigs.
If Boothe was a leftist, then so were Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis.
No Lincoln had not been an abolitionist - originally. But he was definitely a free soiler, in that he wanted to surround the slave states with free states to put an economic stranglehold on plantation owners, so they wouldn't be able to move further west once the cotton depleted the soil of all nutrients, thereby causing slavery to slowly die. But Lincoln changed during the war, finally realizing at the end of his life that blacks had every right to stay in America as Americans.
Yes, Oswald defected to Russia, where he married his wife, Marina. It's also true, at the very same time, other marines had defected to the Soviet Union who claimed to be communists but were actually undercover agents. I'm not saying Oswald was one of these, but it's more than a little suspicious that he was able to return to America after a few years, with his wife, a thing almost unheard of during the Cold War - - especially since Oswald had renounced his American citizenship. If Oswald had been an agent at one time, I'm not saying he was still one by November 11, 1963, but it does mean he wasn't what he publically had been painted to be. Then there were his associations he maintained after returning to America, especially with right wing fanatics in the Anti-Castro underground in New Orleans with ties to both the CIA and organized crime that Oswald had been discovered to have had, which were rather contradictory for a communist to have. Oswald is an enigma. Most of the conspiracy theorists probably have it wrong, but I also think the Warren Commision also got it wrong.
Lee was a solider. He was defending his native soil from Federal invaders. Lincoln was a tyrant who violated the Constitution, but i don't have time to go into that now. What is true is Oswald was a communist. Most people are taught that he was some sort of right wing extremist. Not the case.
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,181
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
Are you defending Booth now?
He had similar things to say about Abe before he shot him...
_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?
my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
Leftists are Democrats. Because they sit on the left side of Congress.That is where the term derives. JWB was not a liberal, but he was a leftist. Same deal. I acutally consider Lincoln's assasination a war crime, since fighting was still going during the time he was shot. Futhermore, Lincoln himself was not an abolitionist. That is a liberal lie. He wanted to get rid of the blacks in America and ship them back to Africa. That was his main course of action, had he not been shot. Lee Harvey Oswald was definitely a communist. He had been over in Russia and married a Russian. He didn't want JFK to interfere with communist Russia and he was upset about the Bay of Pigs.
If Boothe was a leftist, then so were Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis.
No Lincoln had not been an abolitionist - originally. But he was definitely a free soiler, in that he wanted to surround the slave states with free states to put an economic stranglehold on plantation owners, so they wouldn't be able to move further west once the cotton depleted the soil of all nutrients, thereby causing slavery to slowly die. But Lincoln changed during the war, finally realizing at the end of his life that blacks had every right to stay in America as Americans.
Yes, Oswald defected to Russia, where he married his wife, Marina. It's also true, at the very same time, other marines had defected to the Soviet Union who claimed to be communists but were actually undercover agents. I'm not saying Oswald was one of these, but it's more than a little suspicious that he was able to return to America after a few years, with his wife, a thing almost unheard of during the Cold War - - especially since Oswald had renounced his American citizenship. If Oswald had been an agent at one time, I'm not saying he was still one by November 11, 1963, but it does mean he wasn't what he publically had been painted to be. Then there were his associations he maintained after returning to America, especially with right wing fanatics in the Anti-Castro underground in New Orleans with ties to both the CIA and organized crime that Oswald had been discovered to have had, which were rather contradictory for a communist to have. Oswald is an enigma. Most of the conspiracy theorists probably have it wrong, but I also think the Warren Commision also got it wrong.
Lee was a solider. He was defending his native soil from Federal invaders. Lincoln was a tyrant who violated the Constitution, but i don't have time to go into that now. What is true is Oswald was a communist. Most people are taught that he was some sort of right wing extremist. Not the case.
Lee was a traitor who betrayed his country. Lincoln was our greatest President who honored his oath to defend America against enemies both foreign and domestic.
Oswald was an enigma. Yes, he was a communist - at least for a while. If he was a ever an agent, he wouldn't have been the first to have fallen for his own cover. I'm of the opinion that he was a rebel looking for a cause, and God help him, he found it.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
Leftists are Democrats. Because they sit on the left side of Congress.That is where the term derives. JWB was not a liberal, but he was a leftist. Same deal. I acutally consider Lincoln's assasination a war crime, since fighting was still going during the time he was shot. Futhermore, Lincoln himself was not an abolitionist. That is a liberal lie. He wanted to get rid of the blacks in America and ship them back to Africa. That was his main course of action, had he not been shot. Lee Harvey Oswald was definitely a communist. He had been over in Russia and married a Russian. He didn't want JFK to interfere with communist Russia and he was upset about the Bay of Pigs.
If Boothe was a leftist, then so were Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis.
No Lincoln had not been an abolitionist - originally. But he was definitely a free soiler, in that he wanted to surround the slave states with free states to put an economic stranglehold on plantation owners, so they wouldn't be able to move further west once the cotton depleted the soil of all nutrients, thereby causing slavery to slowly die. But Lincoln changed during the war, finally realizing at the end of his life that blacks had every right to stay in America as Americans.
Yes, Oswald defected to Russia, where he married his wife, Marina. It's also true, at the very same time, other marines had defected to the Soviet Union who claimed to be communists but were actually undercover agents. I'm not saying Oswald was one of these, but it's more than a little suspicious that he was able to return to America after a few years, with his wife, a thing almost unheard of during the Cold War - - especially since Oswald had renounced his American citizenship. If Oswald had been an agent at one time, I'm not saying he was still one by November 11, 1963, but it does mean he wasn't what he publically had been painted to be. Then there were his associations he maintained after returning to America, especially with right wing fanatics in the Anti-Castro underground in New Orleans with ties to both the CIA and organized crime that Oswald had been discovered to have had, which were rather contradictory for a communist to have. Oswald is an enigma. Most of the conspiracy theorists probably have it wrong, but I also think the Warren Commision also got it wrong.
Lee was a solider. He was defending his native soil from Federal invaders. Lincoln was a tyrant who violated the Constitution, but i don't have time to go into that now. What is true is Oswald was a communist. Most people are taught that he was some sort of right wing extremist. Not the case.
Lee was a traitor who betrayed his country. Lincoln was our greatest President who honored his oath to defend America against enemies both foreign and domestic.
Oswald was an enigma. Yes, he was a communist - at least for a while. If he was a ever an agent, he wouldn't have been the first to have fallen for his own cover. I'm of the opinion that he was a rebel looking for a cause, and God help him, he found it.
How could Lee be a traitor if he was defending his home state? No, he wasn't a traitor. Don't get me started on "Honest Abe". Honest is one thing he was not. If you ever bother to read real history, let me know.

He had similar things to say about Abe before he shot him...
No, Booth was an idiot. Lincoln would have been easier on reconstruction, and perhaps there would be a way to work out the racial divide . He wanted to take actions similar to Thomas Jefferson in establishing the Negroes back to their homeland in Africa. That being said, I still consider what Booth did a war crime, because there was still fighting going on at the time.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Hard to tell with that adam's apple, and penis.
I don't think that transphobic humor is necessary.
That's sort of the irony of the left. They will cry racism and "homophobia",etc but when the mood strikes them, they dive right in to attack their opponents.
That's the irony of the right. They say stuff like "Huh huh huh, dude, take a chill pill!" or "Quit it with the PC police! Hah hah hah!" but if you point out their behavior, they'll respond with "Shut up, fa***t! I'll f**k you up!" with little to no provocation.
Hmm... In general, conservatives are less likely to respond with an emotionally laden explicative. Just the facts ma'
am is our motto. We have seen the left and the violence that ensues with that type of thinking.
You obviously never heard of the Ronald Gay shooting as well as other violence towards the LGBT community by emotional conservatives.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday ... /85786224/
Most conservatives I know have threatened anyone who thinks differently than them with violence.
When Obama was president, there was some mild protesting on the part of the right, but by and large they weren't on grand scale madness that we have seen from the leftists- especially in recent years. Also, most U.S. presidents that were asassinated were by leftists. JFK was not shot by a conservative, he was killed by a commie.
We today have disconnected anarchists committing acts of vandalism, whereas with Obama, Republicans ranging from ground level loons to elected politicians at the city, state, and federal level denying that the President was ever born in America (a thing that was an absolute lie), and should be impeached.
As for every assassinated President having been killed by leftists - John Wilkes Boothe and his co-conspirators were all pro-slavery, racist radicals. Hardly seems to the left to me.
There are still many questions surrounding Oswald that we may never know. Even the depth of his commitment to Marxism is open to debate. The investigation conducted by the New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, as well as the House Committee On Assassinations had come to conclusions very different from those come to by the Warren Commission. Or in other words, Oswald may have been involved with others, who then left him holding the bag. The people who were believed by some to have been running Oswald have been described as a combination of criminal elements, and fanatical, right wing Anti Communists.
Leftists are Democrats. Because they sit on the left side of Congress.That is where the term derives. JWB was not a liberal, but he was a leftist. Same deal. I acutally consider Lincoln's assasination a war crime, since fighting was still going during the time he was shot. Futhermore, Lincoln himself was not an abolitionist. That is a liberal lie. He wanted to get rid of the blacks in America and ship them back to Africa. That was his main course of action, had he not been shot. Lee Harvey Oswald was definitely a communist. He had been over in Russia and married a Russian. He didn't want JFK to interfere with communist Russia and he was upset about the Bay of Pigs.
If Boothe was a leftist, then so were Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis.
No Lincoln had not been an abolitionist - originally. But he was definitely a free soiler, in that he wanted to surround the slave states with free states to put an economic stranglehold on plantation owners, so they wouldn't be able to move further west once the cotton depleted the soil of all nutrients, thereby causing slavery to slowly die. But Lincoln changed during the war, finally realizing at the end of his life that blacks had every right to stay in America as Americans.
Yes, Oswald defected to Russia, where he married his wife, Marina. It's also true, at the very same time, other marines had defected to the Soviet Union who claimed to be communists but were actually undercover agents. I'm not saying Oswald was one of these, but it's more than a little suspicious that he was able to return to America after a few years, with his wife, a thing almost unheard of during the Cold War - - especially since Oswald had renounced his American citizenship. If Oswald had been an agent at one time, I'm not saying he was still one by November 11, 1963, but it does mean he wasn't what he publically had been painted to be. Then there were his associations he maintained after returning to America, especially with right wing fanatics in the Anti-Castro underground in New Orleans with ties to both the CIA and organized crime that Oswald had been discovered to have had, which were rather contradictory for a communist to have. Oswald is an enigma. Most of the conspiracy theorists probably have it wrong, but I also think the Warren Commision also got it wrong.
Lee was a solider. He was defending his native soil from Federal invaders. Lincoln was a tyrant who violated the Constitution, but i don't have time to go into that now. What is true is Oswald was a communist. Most people are taught that he was some sort of right wing extremist. Not the case.
Lee was a traitor who betrayed his country. Lincoln was our greatest President who honored his oath to defend America against enemies both foreign and domestic.
Oswald was an enigma. Yes, he was a communist - at least for a while. If he was a ever an agent, he wouldn't have been the first to have fallen for his own cover. I'm of the opinion that he was a rebel looking for a cause, and God help him, he found it.
How could Lee be a traitor if he was defending his home state? No, he wasn't a traitor. Don't get me started on "Honest Abe". Honest is one thing he was not. If you ever bother to read real history, let me know.
Lee's country was the United States of America, not Virginia. Ergo, he betrayed his country.
As for reading real history - I have a BA in history, and so I have read more than a little history, though not any of that Neo-Confederate revisionist fake history.
No, Lincoln was no more honest than most politicians. But at least he was far more competent than his counterpart, Jefferson Davis. In fact, some historians have come to the conclusion that, had the United States, and the Confederacy exchanged chief executives, the war might have had a very different outcome.
Even if you don't believe that the war was about slavery, the fact remains, slavery ended because of a Union victory, hence the right side won.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,157
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
But Anne Coulter she's just a poor misunderstood victim....who's never expressed any form of intolerance ever.

_________________
Metal never dies. \m/
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
If you're aspie and you know it, flap your hands! |
09 Jul 2025, 9:41 pm |
Worried I've lost my aspie friend and he's being manipulated |
29 May 2025, 8:54 pm |