Kraichgauer wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
Well good for you. I guess you won't be going to hell when you die like I will.
No, I never said you were going to Hell (Aspies shouldn't try reading between the lines, me included). My point was, I was raised to believe in grace and love earned by the God who humbled himself to die on the cross. Not one who believes in damning people for something their ancestors were responsible for.
For all our disagreements, you make a lot of sense to me here. Good stuff.
TW1ZTY, be careful about who you choose to believe. White southern gentry were NOT the good guys in the Civil War. Much of the history was rewritten not to favor the victors, but rather the victims. What we are supposed to think is that modern American liberalism won the war and through a series of events the good guys jumped ship and joined the Democratic party and mean, evil racists jumped ship and became Republicans. True, the Democratic Party has made itself repulsive to bigots, but white democrats do continue to hold a condescending attitude towards victim classes. Those poor non-whites can’t do anything for themselves, they NEED their wealthy, white saviors.
Seriously, for most of my life I’ve been a figurative Confederate flag saver until it occurred to me that flag never represented any of my values. A lot of white Republicans cheer for the south on the premise of states’ rights, but they have a skewed sense of history that plays right into the hands of victim hood. I can’t blame people for buying the narrative and believing we’re all bigots when we don’t strike at the source of it.
Don’t even take my word for it, either. Take a good look at the events leading up to the War of Northern Aggression and the aftermath. I think you’ll find it was never about North vs South, but rather the regional conflict was dominated by distinct ideologies. Southerners got pulled into the war as a matter of defending the lives of their loved ones and deserve to be honored for that. But the government they served was committed to preserving a cruel and unjust institution and is not to be cheered for. It’s strictly been a political war ever since, and the metaphorical South has made significant gains in the last few decades. California pretty much is its own separate country. Blacks continue to be segregated, a cycle perpetuated by “community organizers.” I’ve heard of Hispanics who accept welfare because it pays more to NOT get a job. Remind me...whose policies removed incentives for work? Was it the same party who championed slavery? Heck, if we can’t make ‘em work, at least we can get their votes, right?
Like I said, draw your own conclusions. “The South” is just everyone’s whipping boy, a convenient one for collectivists in this country. It’s a scapegoat. When you get right down to it, this has absolutely nothing to do with geography.