Are there any post coup attempt EX-trump supporters here?
I do find the term "insurrection" a little over-the-top. It's like how breaking into and burning down a police station isn't going to change police procedure, it's a disruption. Though it shows there is a large element of society that see a problem with police procedure.
Same with the Capitol storming. None of those people had any real power to change the election results. It was disruption, yes. But "insurrection" seems misleading, as does "coup." There was no organized overthrow of government by a militarized unit.
(I don't condone any of these forms of vandalism or trespassing.)
I fear a glorified sit-in at the US Capitol will now be used as a false pretext to go after anyone and everyone who doesn't tow the one party line. Ask yourself why so many people showed up in the first place. Just like why so many people rioted in Portland and elsewhere.
To say all these people (in all these different protests) are simply "crazy" is to ignore broader problems about the system itself.
I totally agree
But politicians will always grab an opportunity to make political capitol capital, hence my taking what they say with a grain of salt.
3 *protesters* died through medical conditions, or are you including others later on?
Last edited by Pepe on 15 Jan 2021, 6:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
I do find the term "insurrection" a little over-the-top. It's like how breaking into and burning down a police station isn't going to change police procedure, it's a disruption. Though it shows there is a large element of society that see a problem with police procedure.
Same with the Capitol storming. None of those people had any real power to change the election results. It was disruption, yes. But "insurrection" seems misleading, as does "coup." There was no organized overthrow of government by a militarized unit.
(I don't condone any of these forms of vandalism or trespassing.)
I fear a glorified sit-in at the US Capitol will now be used as a false pretext to go after anyone and everyone who doesn't tow the one party line. Ask yourself why so many people showed up in the first place. Just like why so many people rioted in Portland and elsewhere.
To say all these people (in all these different protests) are simply "crazy" is to ignore broader problems about the system itself.
“in·sur·rec·tion
/ˌinsəˈrekSH(ə)n/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
"the insurrection was savagely put down"”
That’s what it was. It’s not defined as being by a highly trained militarized unit
You mean like the leftist riots not that long ago?
There seems to be a terminal case of 'Double Standards' in evidence.
I don't support what happened at the Capitol. HOWEVER, as you yourself pointed out, those people were morons. There's no way in hell their disruption would or could ever literally stop the federal government from proceeding or functioning indefinitely, nor lead to an overthrow of American government entirely. Never in a million years. So, it's silly to pretend it actually could. It accomplished nothing, nor could it ever have. Which is why I don't think the whole government apparatus could collapse over a few hundred morons. Which is why we need to stop pretending this compares to the destruction and collapse of the Twin Towers and the death of 3,000 people.
I totally agree.
Perhaps these so called 'Oversea Experts' are morons also?
I agree, Pepe. And that's precisely my point of contention. I don't condone what happened that day, but to state this was a literal coup with any chance of accomplishing an actual and potential overthrow of the entire federal government apparatus is an outright ludicrous claim to make.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas
You bring a gun to protest...bad. Criminal.
But that's not the same as a highly-trained military unit with guns taking directives from a powerful player in the military, with other generals and admirals backing the whole thing and ready to support the overthrow.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas
I agree, Pepe. And that's precisely my point of contention. I don't condone what happened that day, but to state this was a literal coup with any chance of accomplishing an actual and potential overthrow of the entire federal government apparatus is an outright ludicrous claim to make.
Agreed.
Total politically sensationalised rubbish.
How is it somehow my fault that treasonous republicans could only recruit such minimal numbers of military/police trained insurrectionists and had to rely on morons that didn’t know what they were doing?
They’re all going to jail. Maybe trump included.
Perhaps, but what you're peddling is still hearsay and contradictory to the official narrative. And what was the end goal? Temporary disruption of the certification process? Actually harming, taking hostages, and perhaps killing members of Congress? Would all branches of the US military back and defend these intruders and take orders from whatever they might have decreed from the Capitol?
I still fail to see how this could, in any reality, have totally dismantled and usurped the federal government of the USA or changed anything.
How can people see it any other way.
It is bizarre that they don't.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,227
Location: the island of defective toy santas
And it didn't happen?
That was lucky.
luck indeed that the mob entrusted to do the dirty work was a bit too inept and not quite lucky enough. just by a bit.
When exactly did we decide a coup attempt isn't a coup attempt if it didn't have a chance of succeeding?
"Sure they were trying to murder elected officials to prevent a transfer of power but they wouldn't have succeeded even if they had lynched every single congressional democrat, so why are we making such a big deal about it??"
Did you guys know that the Confederacy wasn't actually an attempted secessionist movement because there was never a chance of them defeating the Union? Did you guys know that the Whiskey Rebellion wasn't actually an attempted rebellion because they were never going to defeat the US military? Did you guys know the Oklahoma City bombing wasn't an actual attempt to start a race war because it was never going to successfully start a race war?
If I lob a brick at someone's head to get them to do something and miss, I don't get to say it's not a big deal when they get pissed by saying that it was never going to hit them in the head to begin with.
_________________
Diagnoses: AS, Depression, General & Social Anxiety
I guess I just wasn't made for these times.
- Brian Wilson
Δυνατὰ δὲ οἱ προύχοντες πράσσουσι καὶ οἱ ἀσθενεῖς ξυγχωροῦσιν.
Those with power do what their power permits, and the weak can only acquiesce.
- Thucydides
Conservatism discourages thought, discussion, consensus, empathy, and hope.
Last edited by roronoa79 on 15 Jan 2021, 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Anything which makes a game of spotting WP members with any particular characteristic is not acceptable, and especially so when the aim is, shall we say, "less than charitable".
Other unacceptable examples: let's play "Spot the Jew"? No. Or "Spot the evangelist"? No. Or "Spot the Vegan"? No.
Or "Spot the Trump supporter"? No.
But, but - that's for fun and not like those examples. Yes it is; it's just the same.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.
"Sure they were trying to murder elected officials to prevent a transfer of power but they wouldn't have succeeded even if they had lynched every single congressional democrat, so why are we making such a big deal about it??"
Did you guys know that the Confederacy wasn't actually an attempted secessionist movement because there was never a chance of them defeating the Union? Did you guys know that the Whiskey Rebellion wasn't actually an attempted rebellion because they were never going to defeat the US military? Did you guys know the Oklahoma City bombing wasn't an actual attempt to start a race war because it was never going to successfully start a race war?
And the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923 wasn't a coup attempt, as it didn't succeed either.
No need to take a harsh stance against the instigators... 8 months in prison will suffice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall ... and_prison
... the rest is history.
Hopefully, the US government will not make the same mistake of being so lenient against those who assault the fundamental political institutions of the country.
Anything which makes a game of spotting WP members with any particular characteristic is not acceptable, and especially so when the aim is, shall we say, "less than charitable".
Other unacceptable examples: let's play "Spot the Jew"? No. Or "Spot the evangelist"? No. Or "Spot the Vegan"? No.
Or "Spot the Trump supporter"? No.
But, but - that's for fun and not like those examples. Yes it is; it's just the same.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
