Page 12 of 93 [ 1477 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 93  Next

Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

08 Aug 2007, 2:16 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?

Women are better at sucking a penis than men are. Please don't ask me to go into the depths, as it were, of their silky mouths, and their natural subtle eroticism which so inflames us. Men suck more like they're playing professional sports, or working out, than like they're actually making sweet, sweet love to their partners.

And you would know this how exactly?


I've been sucked. :D But only by my wife.

Exactly.
And, incidentally, why is it OK for you and your wife to engage in oral sex, but not me and my (non existent) girlfriend? After all, neither of these would result in any kids. So how does you and your wife being married somehow make it alright for you, but not me?



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 2:24 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i am disappointed that you still havent really tried to improve your rebuttals and still implement ignoring things and giving glib responses that do not contribute...

I'm not a student in your classroom. I had a teacher friend who talked to me the way you are, and she apologized for it because she was shifting into "teacher mode" unaware.
Sedaka wrote:
you know, it's not even necessarily a bad thing to admit you dont have the answer for something....

that at least would show you are giving soem sort of true consideration for things

I already admitted I don't understand evo theory in detail.


ill apologize when you admit what blatant ignorant ass that you're being...

Image
Sedaka wrote:
you dont have a logical reason for why homosexuality is a sin and why it's not something that just goes away when you want...

If you can manage to willfully keep away from other people's naked genetalia, then homosexuality has gone away from you as far as the Bible is concerned. That willfulness involves trying to curb your lust as well. We're above beasts, and we should act like it.
Sedaka wrote:
your little example and "comparison" of the nature of the sins (which you now back out of) had no logic whatsoever...

I don't back out of it. You just don't receive points you don't want to receive.
Sedaka wrote:
you cant fathom homosexuality as you have claimed

That's a wild enough claim to be untrustworthy -- especially since I know my own thoughts better than you know my thoughts. :o


a) i dont consider that an apology.... just your last resort

b) just because im not gay doesnt mean i sin any less on the topic... because i think being gay is fine and perfectly moral... and actually no.... that still does concern the bible (god) or else he wouldnt care about things like coveting or the true nature of your heart......... and how do you know who i am? do you know that i havent been with women? ive stated on other threads id like to have many men and that i'd be fine if women were rpesent... so dont just think you can write me off and push me to the side cause you dont have the fortitude to deal with me head on....

c) you did back out of the comparison by saying that they are different.... i received whatever frivoulous points you deem non-trivial... you ignored my point for several pages and then answered it with one of your infamous one-liners.......

d) if you can make such claims on my knoweldge of your thoughts and strifes.... how can you say you know what it must be like to deal with such strifes being a gay person trying to "convert" for salvation... did you used to be gay and have sucessfully started living a hetero life for god??? if not.... then you cannot fathom what that is like... it's the same point you just gave me (different context in principle,sllightly, which gives me more precedence for using it in the context i did... but then, we're not thinking that much on these matters... so it's kinda mute at this point) and this is all i want you to concede... im nowhere near as pretentious as you are, but i have to over simplifiy and generalize things in order for you to even take a bite... so im trying to take these little irrelevent points you try to make in stride...


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:35 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
and i think it's stupid you sad you treat this like anything else unimportant to you........ (ESPECIALLY when you put words into God's mouth! gotta be a sin in there somewhere)

In regard to the phase I bolded, to what are you referring?


can you keep nothing straight?

im referring to your claims of meshing evolution with the will of god.... when clearly dont dont even believe in the CORE concepts of evolution

with your literal interpretation of things... it's illogical and blasphemous (to god and evolution) to do so

:lol:
Sedaka wrote:
people who take less literal intepretations of the bible have no qualms putting the two together

but it's deceving and thoughtless (cause you dont seem to care about trivial points) on your behalf to make such gossamar statements


You're seeing "devils, devils everywhere", and I don't know what you're ranting about.


you're like a squirrel who cannot remember where he put his nuts.......

must be nice not having to worry about such trivial stuff.


Hey, don't pick on my brain. It's mercurial, and I don't apologize for that. You forget all kinds of things you and I have said, it's just typical absent-mindedness on both our parts, fellow human being.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:38 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?


technically oral sex is sodomy.........

so ragtime shouldnt have any carnal knoweldge of this either...

or he should at the very least be screaming, "oh god im sorry" in the midst of it

and afterward

edit: oral/anal sex and pretty much anything that is not "vanilla" is considered sodomy and thus homosexuality shouldnt even be necesaary to consider it a sin... so i dont see how caring whether men or women are better at performing either has any relevance...


But you expect me to treat your side points with relevance?

And no, you're wrong, oral sex is not sodomy. That's an aberrant definition.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:41 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
and i think it's stupid you sad you treat this like anything else unimportant to you........ (ESPECIALLY when you put words into God's mouth! gotta be a sin in there somewhere)

In regard to the phase I bolded, to what are you referring?


can you keep nothing straight?

im referring to your claims of meshing evolution with the will of god.... when clearly dont dont even believe in the CORE concepts of evolution

with your literal interpretation of things... it's illogical and blasphemous (to god and evolution) to do so


I know you love evolution (sort of a make-shift deity to you?), but I don't think someone can blaspheme it.

You're getting emotional because I'm trivilizing the thing you most hold dear, and that's understandable.


i use using the term figuratively... as i am up to speed on definitions

you couldnt even comprehend my beliefs if i tried to explain... evolution does not encompass my beliefs nor does it compass yours


i get emotional cause you're being obtuse and uncooperative...


You mean I'm not bowing to your opinion. Otherwise, I'm being perfectly civil. (Well, except for that butt photo. But hey, Sopho rolled out the rainbow flag -- I guess I got caught up with symbolism.)


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 08 Aug 2007, 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 2:41 pm

Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?

Women are better at sucking a penis than men are. Please don't ask me to go into the depths, as it were, of their silky mouths, and their natural subtle eroticism which so inflames us. Men suck more like they're playing professional sports, or working out, than like they're actually making sweet, sweet love to their partners.

And you would know this how exactly?


I've been sucked. :D But only by my wife.

Exactly.
And, incidentally, why is it OK for you and your wife to engage in oral sex, but not me and my (non existent) girlfriend? After all, neither of these would result in any kids. So how does you and your wife being married somehow make it alright for you, but not me?

yeah... why Ragtime? :?



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:45 pm

Kilroy wrote:
lemmie ask you something-are people like me-Soph and Chuck Panozzo bad people for being gay/bi/whatever?
be honest...


No.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 2:48 pm

then what-d we have to change
must we hide and conform to what christians say?
(like I am told to conform to the NT ways) :?



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm

Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?

Women are better at sucking a penis than men are. Please don't ask me to go into the depths, as it were, of their silky mouths, and their natural subtle eroticism which so inflames us. Men suck more like they're playing professional sports, or working out, than like they're actually making sweet, sweet love to their partners.

And you would know this how exactly?


I've been sucked. :D But only by my wife.

Exactly.
And, incidentally, why is it OK for you and your wife to engage in oral sex, but not me and my (non existent) girlfriend? After all, neither of these would result in any kids. So how does you and your wife being married somehow make it alright for you, but not me?


Sopho, why do you care what I think? You've already said, and shown, that you don't, so why waste my time? You too, Kilroy.

Your real problem with me is that I esteem God above man.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 08 Aug 2007, 3:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 3:01 pm

a lot of people dont lie the idea of worshiping anything ya know
people like to think this is it-there's no god in heaven, the bible is bull and the church is useless
its how athiests work



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 3:02 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?


technically oral sex is sodomy.........

so ragtime shouldnt have any carnal knoweldge of this either...

or he should at the very least be screaming, "oh god im sorry" in the midst of it

and afterward

edit: oral/anal sex and pretty much anything that is not "vanilla" is considered sodomy and thus homosexuality shouldnt even be necesaary to consider it a sin... so i dont see how caring whether men or women are better at performing either has any relevance...


But you expect me to treat your side points with relevance?

And no, you're wrong, oral sex is not sodomy. That's an aberrant definition.


plz clarify what you consider sodomy then...... cause i know several sources where oral sex is considered such...... anything that does not specifical lead to making a baby in marriage is a sin

how are you deducing it's an abberant definition?


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

08 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho, why do you care what I think? You've already said, and shown, that you don't, so why waste my time?

Your real problem with me is that I esteem God above man.

Not going to answer my question?
It's not that I 'care', as such. It's more that I have nothing much to do right now. And tbh, if you didn't 'care' so much about me (and others) being gay, I wouldn't 'care' about why you 'care.' I've been told on numerous occasions that I need to respect religious people more, and try and understand other people's points of view. So I am. I'm trying to understand why you're all so delusional. Please enlighten me.



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 3:04 pm

Sedaka wrote:

b) just because im not gay doesnt mean i sin any less on the topic... because i think being gay is fine and perfectly moral... and actually no.... that still does concern the bible (god) or else he wouldnt care about things like coveting or the true nature of your heart......... and how do you know who i am? do you know that i havent been with women? ive stated on other threads id like to have many men and that i'd be fine if women were rpesent... so dont just think you can write me off and push me to the side cause you dont have the fortitude to deal with me head on....

What are you talking about?? There's a major theory-of-mind deficit here... I'm not considering you having "any less sin". Counting people's sins is beyond the purvue of the church. Only God can number sins, or judge someone to be more sinful than another. No one can judge hearts but God alone. If I have a little affection for you, that's my bias, not anything based on the truth.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 3:05 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?

Women are better at sucking a penis than men are. Please don't ask me to go into the depths, as it were, of their silky mouths, and their natural subtle eroticism which so inflames us. Men suck more like they're playing professional sports, or working out, than like they're actually making sweet, sweet love to their partners.

And you would know this how exactly?


I've been sucked. :D But only by my wife.

Exactly.
And, incidentally, why is it OK for you and your wife to engage in oral sex, but not me and my (non existent) girlfriend? After all, neither of these would result in any kids. So how does you and your wife being married somehow make it alright for you, but not me?


Sopho, why do you care what I think? You've already said, and shown, that you don't, so why waste my time?

Your real problem with me is that I esteem God above man.


people keep asking cause you never give answers to their questions.....

you never have logical reasoning beyone "cause the bible says so"

which is the whole point of these conversations...


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 3:08 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:

b) just because im not gay doesnt mean i sin any less on the topic... because i think being gay is fine and perfectly moral... and actually no.... that still does concern the bible (god) or else he wouldnt care about things like coveting or the true nature of your heart......... and how do you know who i am? do you know that i havent been with women? ive stated on other threads id like to have many men and that i'd be fine if women were rpesent... so dont just think you can write me off and push me to the side cause you dont have the fortitude to deal with me head on....

What are you talking about?? There's a major theory-of-mind deficit here... I'm not considering you having "any less sin". Counting people's sins is beyond the purvue of the church. Only God can number sins, or judge someone to be more sinful than another. No one can judge hearts but God alone. If I have a little affection for you, that's my bias, not anything based on the truth.


why do you ALWAYS specifically edit out your portion of the quotes when they have the key elements to your questions you mirror back at me?

you avoided my line of conversation by saying the bible/god doesnt care about my philosophy on hmosexuality BECAUSE IM NOT ACTUALLY GAY

i countered and said that's not true...... what's not to see?


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 3:08 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?


technically oral sex is sodomy.........

so ragtime shouldnt have any carnal knoweldge of this either...

or he should at the very least be screaming, "oh god im sorry" in the midst of it

and afterward

edit: oral/anal sex and pretty much anything that is not "vanilla" is considered sodomy and thus homosexuality shouldnt even be necesaary to consider it a sin... so i dont see how caring whether men or women are better at performing either has any relevance...


But you expect me to treat your side points with relevance?

And no, you're wrong, oral sex is not sodomy. That's an aberrant definition.


plz clarify what you consider sodomy then...... cause i know several sources where oral sex is considered such...... anything that does not specifical lead to making a baby in marriage is a sin

how are you deducing it's an abberant definition?


How about because no one thinks that's the definition? Definitions are made by common usage. And besides, stimulation without orgasm is an entirely different thing morally.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 08 Aug 2007, 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.