Page 13 of 16 [ 242 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next


What do you think of Rush Limbaugh's pay?
He is over-paid 54%  54%  [ 19 ]
He is paid what he is worth 43%  43%  [ 15 ]
He is under-paid 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 35

joestenr
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 318
Location: niantic connecticut

26 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm

are we considering his current wage or the amount that he took home while cheating the welfare system (look it up)



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Apr 2011, 7:29 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

26 Apr 2011, 9:27 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

26 Apr 2011, 9:31 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


exactly theyare entertainers and should not be used for political information.
they both preach exclusively to the choir, boring.
infact no none with a talkshow or that works for a network left or right should be seen
as a valid political figure.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

26 Apr 2011, 10:53 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


exactly theyare entertainers and should not be used for political information.
they both preach exclusively to the choir, boring.
infact no none with a talkshow or that works for a network left or right should be seen
as a valid political figure.


So in other words you want to trample on the 1st Amendment is that it, define unbiased. There is no unbiased source out there.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

26 Apr 2011, 11:18 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


exactly they are entertainers and should not be used for political information.
they both preach exclusively to the choir, boring.
infact no one with a talkshow or that works for a network left or right should be seen
as a valid political figure.


So in other words you want to trample on the 1st Amendment is that it, define unbiased. There is no unbiased source out there.


what !? did you read what I said? I did not even use the word unbiased (actually I'm agnostic that such a thing exists)
this is a straw man that does not even have a connection to the argument.
the 1st amendment? wtf are you talking about?
they both fill the function of blowing complimentary smoke.
tv personalities should not be seen as political figures.
actors don't make good presidents.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Apr 2011, 11:45 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


I'm going by memory about what Limbaugh said. But I'm afraid I'm not so pathologically enthralled by the man that I'm going to remember each and every date of his statements.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

27 Apr 2011, 12:25 am

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


exactly they are entertainers and should not be used for political information.
they both preach exclusively to the choir, boring.
infact no one with a talkshow or that works for a network left or right should be seen
as a valid political figure.


So in other words you want to trample on the 1st Amendment is that it, define unbiased. There is no unbiased source out there.


what !? did you read what I said? I did not even use the word unbiased (actually I'm agnostic that such a thing exists)


I'm pointing out that every news outlet is going to be left or right leaning.

JakobVirgil wrote:
this is a straw man that does not even have a connection to the argument.


Actually it isn't a strawman, right now Rush Limbaugh has more credibility than several media outlets including the New York Times.

JakobVirgil wrote:
the 1st amendment? wtf are you talking about?


The fact you seem to want Mr. Limbaugh taken off the air because you can't stand his opinions.

JakobVirgil wrote:
they both fill the function of blowing complimentary smoke.


No, they don't Limbaugh doesn't stoop to the level many on the left do.

JakobVirgil wrote:
tv personalities should not be seen as political figures.


I'm sure certain TV Personalities don't want to be political figures (example: Glenn Beck), however that doesn't mean they should sit there and ignore people that are actively trying to destroy this country either (example: George Soros).

JakobVirgil wrote:
actors don't make good presidents.


Ronald Reagan was a great President, he won the Cold War and brought about the implosion of the Soviet Union. Thing is Obama is trying to use the same tactics the Soviets tried that caused their collapse.

Actors can actually make good Presidents.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

27 Apr 2011, 12:35 am

Obama is pouring all the nation's wealth into defense at the expense of the infrastructure? That's how the Soviet Union actually collapsed.
As far as Limbaugh being more reliable than any other news source - and the other liberals on WP think you don't have a sense of humor.
As for a multi-billionaire like George Soros being out to destroy America - well, the Koch brothers have gotten him beat in that regard.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

27 Apr 2011, 10:12 am

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


exactly they are entertainers and should not be used for political information.
they both preach exclusively to the choir, boring.
infact no one with a talkshow or that works for a network left or right should be seen
as a valid political figure.


So in other words you want to trample on the 1st Amendment is that it, define unbiased. There is no unbiased source out there.


what !? did you read what I said? I did not even use the word unbiased (actually I'm agnostic that such a thing exists)


I'm pointing out that every news outlet is going to be left or right leaning.

JakobVirgil wrote:
this is a straw man that does not even have a connection to the argument.


Actually it isn't a strawman, right now Rush Limbaugh has more credibility than several media outlets including the New York Times.

JakobVirgil wrote:
the 1st amendment? wtf are you talking about?


The fact you seem to want Mr. Limbaugh taken off the air because you can't stand his opinions.

JakobVirgil wrote:
they both fill the function of blowing complimentary smoke.


No, they don't Limbaugh doesn't stoop to the level many on the left do.

JakobVirgil wrote:
tv personalities should not be seen as political figures.


I'm sure certain TV Personalities don't want to be political figures (example: Glenn Beck), however that doesn't mean they should sit there and ignore people that are actively trying to destroy this country either (example: George Soros).

JakobVirgil wrote:
actors don't make good presidents.


Ronald Reagan was a great President, he won the Cold War and brought about the implosion of the Soviet Union. Thing is Obama is trying to use the same tactics the Soviets tried that caused their collapse.

Actors can actually make good Presidents.


oye - your brain it don't work good.
I never said the rush should be taken off the air.
I said he should not be taken seriously politicaly.
please, learn to read or have someone read to you.
you mistate on purpose to get a raise off of aspies.
you are a NT troll get a life.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

27 Apr 2011, 11:12 am

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I have to concede, I know little or nothing about what Heston had said as president of the NRA, as I really have little opinion either way about gun rights and gun control. But regardless, Moore puts a lot of time, effort and money into making his movies, whereas Limbaugh just spouts caustic nonsense into a microphone.
Moore genuinely earns what he creates.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point isn't about Heston or even gun rights but about Micheal Moore's integrity as a maker of "documentaries". The Heston distortion was just one in a long string of untruths and misleading set pieces that he's put together over the years, right down to his own background (he's not really from Flint). His movies might be entertaining if you agree with what he has to say, but they should rightly be shelved in the fiction section at the videostore. Sure, Moore might be marginally more subtle than Limbaugh, but they're in different medias with different audiences and have different strengths; we don't know what a Michael Moore radio show or a Rush Limbaugh movie might look like.


Dox47, Limbaugh actually does do research for his show, and in all honesty the left provides so much material that he doesn't have to make anything up.


Limbaugh researching? Like when he said that there are more American Indians alive today than there were when Columbus arrived in the New World? Or when he said Obama didn't have a birth certificate?


When did he say those things and again I want sources.

Kraichgauer wrote:
Moore may have a slanted view of the world, but I'm more likely to believe anything he said over Limbaugh.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Moore isn't on the air 2-3 hours a day 5 days a week, anyone talking that much per day is going to say something stupid once in a while.


exactly they are entertainers and should not be used for political information.
they both preach exclusively to the choir, boring.
infact no one with a talkshow or that works for a network left or right should be seen
as a valid political figure.


So in other words you want to trample on the 1st Amendment is that it, define unbiased. There is no unbiased source out there.


what !? did you read what I said? I did not even use the word unbiased (actually I'm agnostic that such a thing exists)


I'm pointing out that every news outlet is going to be left or right leaning.

JakobVirgil wrote:
this is a straw man that does not even have a connection to the argument.


Actually it isn't a strawman, right now Rush Limbaugh has more credibility than several media outlets including the New York Times.

JakobVirgil wrote:
the 1st amendment? wtf are you talking about?


The fact you seem to want Mr. Limbaugh taken off the air because you can't stand his opinions.

JakobVirgil wrote:
they both fill the function of blowing complimentary smoke.


No, they don't Limbaugh doesn't stoop to the level many on the left do.

JakobVirgil wrote:
tv personalities should not be seen as political figures.


I'm sure certain TV Personalities don't want to be political figures (example: Glenn Beck), however that doesn't mean they should sit there and ignore people that are actively trying to destroy this country either (example: George Soros).

JakobVirgil wrote:
actors don't make good presidents.


Ronald Reagan was a great President, he won the Cold War and brought about the implosion of the Soviet Union. Thing is Obama is trying to use the same tactics the Soviets tried that caused their collapse.

Actors can actually make good Presidents.


oye - your brain it don't work good.
I never said the rush should be taken off the air.


You implied he should be taken off the air.

JakobVirgil wrote:
I said he should not be taken seriously politicaly.


If the information he is stating is accurate, then yeah he should be taken seriously.

JakobVirgil wrote:
please, learn to read or have someone read to you.


Typical liberal elitist, always assuming people are somehow inferior because they don't agree with you. I was reading college level text books for fun by 8th grade.

JakobVirgil wrote:
you mistate on purpose to get a raise off of aspies.


It would be "rise" not "raise." Further you're really out of line, guess you can't handle the fact someone disagrees with you.

JakobVirgil wrote:
you are a NT troll get a life.


:roll:

1. I am actually on the spectrum.

2. I am not a troll, I don't say things to anger people for amusement.

I find your arrogance and intolerance to be just plain sad, as much as you may wish for me to run around screaming that I somehow hate you, I don't. I pity you, that's right I feel sorry about the fact you can't face the concept that people whom are Conservative are not intellectually inferior to you and are also not evil. Seriously, I think many liberals are arrogant idiots with over-inflated opinions of themselves, but I don't think all of them are.

Rush Limbaugh, obviously gets under liberals' skin to the point that they react to him in hatred, try to smear him, etc. Well got news for liberals, their over-reacting (though I think he's actually hit too close to the truth for the radical left's comfort), actually adds to Rush Limbaugh's credibility.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

27 Apr 2011, 11:29 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think that conservatives are intellectually inferior
I think you are.
(you don't like to hear other peoples arguments)
there are a long list of conservatives I think are quite bright
George Will
William F. Buckley sr.
David Brooks
Ernie Hancock
Shelby Steele
Jaun Williams
Barry Goldwater
.
.
.
on some strange occasions even Pat Buchanan.

notice that Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are not on the list.
because they like you are not conservative thinkers they are rodeo clowns.

I used to work for the republican party (Bob Bennett's 1st campaign)
maybe you are on the spectrum
you don't seem to have a working theory of mind for who you are talking to.
you continually misread and mistate other peoples oppions.
(on purpose or because of a learning disorder ? I don't know)
but then again all of your arguments contain a emotional component.
fear, villification, conspiracy.
don't know not a headshrinker.
all I know is you undermine my oppionions of smart conservatives.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

27 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think that conservatives are intellectually inferior
I think you are.
(you don't like to hear other peoples arguments)
there are a long list of conservatives I think are quite bright
George Will
William F. Buckley sr.
David Brooks
Ernie Hancock
Shelby Steele
Jaun Williams
Barry Goldwater
.
.
.
on some strange occasions even Pat Buchanan.

notice that Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are not on the list.
because they like you are not conservative thinkers they are rodeo clowns.

I used to work for the republican party (Bob Bennett's 1st campaign)
maybe you are on the spectrum
you don't seem to have a working theory of mind for who you are talking to.
you continually misread and mistate other peoples oppions.
(on purpose or because of a learning disorder ? I don't know)
but then again all of your arguments contain a emotional component.
fear, villification, conspiracy.
don't know not a headshrinker.
all I know is you undermine my oppionions of smart conservatives.


While wikipedia claims George Will is a conservative, he's more center-left.
William Buckley Jr, died in 2008
David Brooks -- Are you referring to the man that works at the NY Times, if so he's a liberal trying to pretend he's a conservative which is probably why you like him.
Ernest Hancock is a libertarian that tried to run against John McCain in 2004 with no success. Guessing he is also for legalizing drugs (can't find much on him) so that's probably why you like him.
Shelby Steele -- Finally someone that is actually center-right.
Juan Williams is not a Conservative he's a liberal.
Barry Goldwater died in 1998

Of the people you claimed are conservatives 3 are liberals, 1 is center right, 1 is a libertarian, and 2 are deceased.

You just proved my point, you seem to think people are intellectually inferior to you because you don't agree with them.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

27 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think that conservatives are intellectually inferior
I think you are.
(you don't like to hear other peoples arguments)
there are a long list of conservatives I think are quite bright
George Will
William F. Buckley sr.
David Brooks
Ernie Hancock
Shelby Steele
Jaun Williams
Barry Goldwater
.
.
.
on some strange occasions even Pat Buchanan.

notice that Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are not on the list.
because they like you are not conservative thinkers they are rodeo clowns.

I used to work for the republican party (Bob Bennett's 1st campaign)
maybe you are on the spectrum
you don't seem to have a working theory of mind for who you are talking to.
you continually misread and mistate other peoples oppions.
(on purpose or because of a learning disorder ? I don't know)
but then again all of your arguments contain a emotional component.
fear, villification, conspiracy.
don't know not a headshrinker.
all I know is you undermine my oppionions of smart conservatives.


While wikipedia claims George Will is a conservative, he's more center-left.
William Buckley Jr, died in 2008
David Brooks -- Are you referring to the man that works at the NY Times, if so he's a liberal trying to pretend he's a conservative which is probably why you like him.
Ernest Hancock is a libertarian that tried to run against John McCain in 2004 with no success. Guessing he is also for legalizing drugs (can't find much on him) so that's probably why you like him.
Shelby Steele -- Finally someone that is actually center-right.
Juan Williams is not a Conservative he's a liberal.
Barry Goldwater died in 1998

Of the people you claimed are conservatives 3 are liberals, 1 is center right, 1 is a libertarian, and 2 are deceased.

You just proved my point, you seem to think people are intellectually inferior to you because you don't agree with them.


the way you used the word proved and the fact you think George Will is center left and Juan is a liberal implies you are a moron. Juan describes himself as center-right


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

27 Apr 2011, 12:31 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think that conservatives are intellectually inferior
I think you are.
(you don't like to hear other peoples arguments)
there are a long list of conservatives I think are quite bright
George Will
William F. Buckley sr.
David Brooks
Ernie Hancock
Shelby Steele
Jaun Williams
Barry Goldwater
.
.
.
on some strange occasions even Pat Buchanan.

notice that Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are not on the list.
because they like you are not conservative thinkers they are rodeo clowns.

I used to work for the republican party (Bob Bennett's 1st campaign)
maybe you are on the spectrum
you don't seem to have a working theory of mind for who you are talking to.
you continually misread and mistate other peoples oppions.
(on purpose or because of a learning disorder ? I don't know)
but then again all of your arguments contain a emotional component.
fear, villification, conspiracy.
don't know not a headshrinker.
all I know is you undermine my oppionions of smart conservatives.


While wikipedia claims George Will is a conservative, he's more center-left.
William Buckley Jr, died in 2008
David Brooks -- Are you referring to the man that works at the NY Times, if so he's a liberal trying to pretend he's a conservative which is probably why you like him.
Ernest Hancock is a libertarian that tried to run against John McCain in 2004 with no success. Guessing he is also for legalizing drugs (can't find much on him) so that's probably why you like him.
Shelby Steele -- Finally someone that is actually center-right.
Juan Williams is not a Conservative he's a liberal.
Barry Goldwater died in 1998

Of the people you claimed are conservatives 3 are liberals, 1 is center right, 1 is a libertarian, and 2 are deceased.

You just proved my point, you seem to think people are intellectually inferior to you because you don't agree with them.


the way you used the word proved and the fact you think George Will is center left and Juan is a liberal implies you are a moron. Juan describes himself as center-right


Juan Williams is only right wing when you compare him to the leftist fanatics at NPR and the New York Times. George Will works for Newsweek which is notoriously left wing, if he was really a conservative he would have been fired by now.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

27 Apr 2011, 12:32 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

Juan Williams is only right wing when you compare him to the leftist fanatics at NPR and the New York Times. George Will works for Newsweek which is notoriously left wing, if he was really a conservative he would have been fired by now.


Maybe George Will is their "token conservative".

ruveyn