Page 13 of 34 [ 540 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 34  Next

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

22 Feb 2012, 5:54 pm

cw10 wrote:
My view: Religion, a little flawed. Atheism, a little flawed.
Your view: Religion completely flawed. Atheism, not flawed at all.


This is also a blatant lie. The entire reason I joined this discussion was because you quite literally made the inference that atheism is fundamentally immoral and that religion is needed to create a moral framework. Your view is clearly "Religion=Moral, Non-religion=Immoral"


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

22 Feb 2012, 6:02 pm

Thom_Fuleri wrote:
shrox wrote:
Atheism could be flawed. It's a 50/50 chance, either at least one deity exists, or no deities exist. Of course, I say it is flawed, at least one deity exists.


True, but worshipping myself might be considered arrogant. :D


Yes, but you are not a deity, you are a "Fuleri"...

(I get the spelling joke, I think.)



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

22 Feb 2012, 6:04 pm

Vigilans wrote:
cw10 wrote:
My view: Religion, a little flawed. Atheism, a little flawed.
Your view: Religion completely flawed. Atheism, not flawed at all.


This is also a blatant lie. The entire reason I joined this discussion was because you quite literally made the inference that atheism is fundamentally immoral and that religion is needed to create a moral framework. Your view is clearly "Religion=Moral, Non-religion=Immoral"


One can be moral and not know Jesus, but one would have no standard other than one's own, and we are just animals.



Thom_Fuleri
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 849
Location: Leicestershire, UK

22 Feb 2012, 6:05 pm

shrox wrote:
Thom_Fuleri wrote:
shrox wrote:
Atheism could be flawed. It's a 50/50 chance, either at least one deity exists, or no deities exist. Of course, I say it is flawed, at least one deity exists.


True, but worshipping myself might be considered arrogant. :D


Yes, but you are not a deity, you are a "Fuleri"...

(I get the spelling joke, I think.)


Damn, I've just edited that earlier post for clarity. Oh well.
I'm always amused when people don't realise my name is a joke. The spelling is to make it more subtle.
As for not being a deity - prove it! :P



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

22 Feb 2012, 6:06 pm

Thom_Fuleri wrote:
shrox wrote:
Thom_Fuleri wrote:
shrox wrote:
Atheism could be flawed. It's a 50/50 chance, either at least one deity exists, or no deities exist. Of course, I say it is flawed, at least one deity exists.


True, but worshipping myself might be considered arrogant. :D


Yes, but you are not a deity, you are a "Fuleri"...

(I get the spelling joke, I think.)


Damn, I've just edited that earlier post for clarity. Oh well.
I'm always amused when people don't realise my name is a joke. The spelling is to make it more subtle.
As for not being a deity - prove it! :P


OK, who's underwear am I wearing?



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

22 Feb 2012, 6:07 pm

shrox wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
cw10 wrote:
My view: Religion, a little flawed. Atheism, a little flawed.
Your view: Religion completely flawed. Atheism, not flawed at all.


This is also a blatant lie. The entire reason I joined this discussion was because you quite literally made the inference that atheism is fundamentally immoral and that religion is needed to create a moral framework. Your view is clearly "Religion=Moral, Non-religion=Immoral"


One can be moral and not know Jesus, but one would have no standard other than one's own, and we are just animals.


"Knowing Jesus" has not stopped millions of people from acting in ways that most consider "immoral". Religion is not necessary for a person to be moral. Based on human history it might even be the opposite; since "knowing Jesus" does not really dissuade people from being naughty, the whole premise of spiritual accountability is ultimately futile and pointless. It seems the people working hardest at preventing equality are those of religious persuasion, worldwide


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

22 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm

Vigilans wrote:
shrox wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
cw10 wrote:
My view: Religion, a little flawed. Atheism, a little flawed.
Your view: Religion completely flawed. Atheism, not flawed at all.


This is also a blatant lie. The entire reason I joined this discussion was because you quite literally made the inference that atheism is fundamentally immoral and that religion is needed to create a moral framework. Your view is clearly "Religion=Moral, Non-religion=Immoral"


One can be moral and not know Jesus, but one would have no standard other than one's own, and we are just animals.


"Knowing Jesus" has not stopped millions of people from acting in ways that most consider "immoral". Religion is not necessary for a person to be moral. Based on human history it might even be the opposite; since "knowing Jesus" does not really dissuade people from being naughty, the whole premise of spiritual accountability is ultimately futile and pointless. It seems the people working hardest at preventing equality are those of religious persuasion, worldwide


You're just wrong on so many levels, like keeping me online while I should be working, or making my dog wait for me to take her out to go to pee! Or something whiny like that...



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

22 Feb 2012, 6:14 pm

shrox wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
shrox wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
cw10 wrote:
My view: Religion, a little flawed. Atheism, a little flawed.
Your view: Religion completely flawed. Atheism, not flawed at all.


This is also a blatant lie. The entire reason I joined this discussion was because you quite literally made the inference that atheism is fundamentally immoral and that religion is needed to create a moral framework. Your view is clearly "Religion=Moral, Non-religion=Immoral"


One can be moral and not know Jesus, but one would have no standard other than one's own, and we are just animals.


"Knowing Jesus" has not stopped millions of people from acting in ways that most consider "immoral". Religion is not necessary for a person to be moral. Based on human history it might even be the opposite; since "knowing Jesus" does not really dissuade people from being naughty, the whole premise of spiritual accountability is ultimately futile and pointless. It seems the people working hardest at preventing equality are those of religious persuasion, worldwide


You're just wrong on so many levels, like keeping me online while I should be working, or making my dog wait for me to take her out to go to pee! Or something whiny like that...


:? What? If you're going to tell me I'm wrong, at least explain why


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Thom_Fuleri
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 849
Location: Leicestershire, UK

22 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm

shrox wrote:
OK, who's underwear am I wearing?


Yours. :)
Or possibly mine, since as a deity all things are within my remit, but that might be misinterpreted. :oops:



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

22 Feb 2012, 6:22 pm

Thom_Fuleri wrote:
shrox wrote:
OK, who's underwear am I wearing?


Yours. :)
Or possibly mine, since as a deity all things are within my remit, but that might be misinterpreted. :oops:


I go commando...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_commando



cw10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 973

23 Feb 2012, 2:47 am

AngelRho wrote:
cw10 wrote:
Hell (damnation) is a Greek concept and was only adopted in later versions of the bible. You either face god or you don't, it's your choice. Being alone kinda sucks though.

Please explain.

And it's not that I necessarily disagree. The Bible is full of imagery of what separation from God is "like" but doesn't outright give it a name. "Sheol" and "Hades" are very similar but don't necessarily denote a place of eternal torment. If Hades is understood as Tartarus, then that would be different. Otherwise, Sheol and Hades are just generic terms for the underworld. The earlier Christians substituted Hades for Sheol because the concepts are so similar.

Gehenna is another depiction of hell is like, and in modern translations the word Gehenna is translated as "hell." The HSCB translation doesn't really use the word "hell" or "hellfire" all that much, but does make some use of it for the sake of simplicity. There has been increased interest as of late for trying to render translations as close to the original wording and meaning as possible, so I wouldn't be surprised if in the next century or so if the word "hell" became extinct entirely from Bible translations.


Hades, Tartarus, Gehanna, etc. are all later interpretations. From my understanding being separated or I guess you can say shunned is a lot like it would be in life. When everyone turns away from you, it's another kind of torment. But in this case I think it's much simpler than that. It's so simple people think it's complicated. It's ultimately a personal choice, if we do indeed have free will, to face our creator as it were. No one but yourself can make that decision.



cw10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 973

23 Feb 2012, 3:07 am

Vigilans wrote:
cw10 wrote:
You're already coming from an incorrect angle. I'm not Christian, so any preconceived notions you had about me you can toss out the window.


My notions of you are based on our interactions. You have argued in the manner of a fundamentalist, so I'm going to treat you as such. If you are not one, at least outline your views so I do not mistake you

cw10 wrote:
I can see now why you're having such a well thought out and difficult war with me, you don't like Christians.


Most people I know are Christians, so... wrong. I don't dislike Christians, I dislike your assertion that theism is required to live a moral life. You have insulted me on numerous occasions with both direct words and inferences about my morality (which you actually know nothing about). I do not consider the supernatural relevant or meaningful. People can believe what they want, I could care less, so long as it isn't interfering with others lives.

cw10 wrote:
All of your posts have a negative bias towards Christianity. Hell (damnation) is a Greek concept and was only adopted in later versions of the bible. You either face god or you don't, it's your choice. Being alone kinda sucks though.


All I have been doing is defending my morals and trying to get you to back up your claims. You still have yet to do this. In an effort to further evade answering you are now accusing me of what, hating Christians? Make up your mind about what your "moral framework" is. You keep talking about accountability then denying it has anything to do with heaven and hell. Why can't you theists, or whatever you are, just stop flip flopping and answer my damn questions already

Its amusing to me that you accuse me of intolerance and negative bias when most of your posts about atheism are steaming piles of bigoted sh**


I honestly don't care what you believe (in). My argument stems from the lack of understanding most atheist types have pertaining to the type of morality and ethics they subscribe to. There's no concrete rule book so to speak. I see Secular Humanism as a flawed concept as it has no absolute ethic. I think religion has some flaws as well, but I don't reject the philosophy. There are millions of function god loving people on earth who raise healthy families and are productive citizens. People who take religion literally don't get it either.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Feb 2012, 4:02 am

cw10 wrote:
I honestly don't care what you believe (in). My argument stems from the lack of understanding most atheist types have pertaining to the type of morality and ethics they subscribe to. There's no concrete rule book so to speak. I see Secular Humanism as a flawed concept as it has no absolute ethic.


You "don't care" yet you are still willing to assert your morals are superior to mine. This is perhaps one of the most ignorant statements I have read recently. "I don't care what you believe, but I argue that you don't understand what your morals are because you have no concrete rule book". You have got to be kidding me. I hope you realize how hypocritical these types of statements make you religious people look. You have such arrogant certainty about everything. I have doubt. But I am principled and ethical. I never trust people who claim to have all the answers. And I sure as hell am not going to base my life on one book. One book is actually a fairly poor framework to develop morals from, especially considering its antiquity. Many books, experiences and observations have shaped my morals. Just like everybody else. Even you. The Bible is not really the framework that most people use for their morals, at least not by itself. One day you might understand, or not. So long as people like you don't affect my life, I could care less what you do.

I also suggest you analyze the "morality" of the Bible. Lets take the story of Lot and his daughters as a case study. One could probably glean a better moral message than the Bible from Mad Magazine

Unless we're talking about the"Jefferson Bible"

cw10 wrote:
I think religion has some flaws as well, but I don't reject the philosophy. There are millions of function god loving people on earth who raise healthy families and are productive citizens. People who take religion literally don't get it either.


As there are also millions of people on Earth who don't care about god and go about their lives in a productive and ethical manner. Either way, that is irrelevant, since your assertion is that atheists have no moral framework to go by, and thus are fundamentally immoral due to their apparent "flexibility". Yet you still haven't met my challenge to demonstrate how religion as a framework has in any way made the human race more "moral", or prove that atheists are less moral than religious people like yourself. You can keep repeating yourself in different ways or you can answer the question... Until then, you're just blowing smoke


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Last edited by Vigilans on 23 Feb 2012, 4:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Feb 2012, 4:51 am

Quote:
demonstrate how religion as a framework has in any way made the human race more "moral", or prove that atheists are less moral than religious people like yourself.


If cw10 won't answer this question, it is open to anyone else..

My own answer to that question would be that religion as a *sole* framework rarely exists in reasonable people. Most people are reasonable, religious or not and despite what some will say, do not really base all of their views on one book. Truly, that would be absolute madness, when you think about it.

Some people are also extremists of different blends. Sometimes they are religious extremists, other times political. In either case blind ignorance prevails over intellect and horrible things can be done in the name of this or that.

Ultimately, religion is not necessary to provide any sort of cornerstone for morality. That does not mean it doesn't or cannot provide one, but to imply that it is something needed to live normally and morally in the human condition is simply wrong. Especially when many of the "morals" it promotes are of extremely questionable... moral value.


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


cw10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 973

23 Feb 2012, 5:14 am

Vigilans wrote:
cw10 wrote:
I honestly don't care what you believe (in). My argument stems from the lack of understanding most atheist types have pertaining to the type of morality and ethics they subscribe to. There's no concrete rule book so to speak. I see Secular Humanism as a flawed concept as it has no absolute ethic.


You "don't care" yet you are still willing to assert your morals are superior to mine. This is perhaps one of the most ignorant statements I have read recently. "I don't care what you believe, but I argue that you don't understand what your morals are because you have no concrete rule book". You have got to be kidding me. I hope you realize how hypocritical these types of statements make you religious people look. You have such arrogant certainty about everything. I have doubt. But I am principled and ethical. I never trust people who claim to have all the answers. And I sure as hell am not going to base my life on one book. One book is actually a fairly poor framework to develop morals from, especially considering its antiquity. Many books, experiences and observations have shaped my morals. Just like everybody else. Even you. The Bible is not really the framework that most people use for their morals, at least not by itself. One day you might understand, or not. So long as people like you don't affect my life, I could care less what you do.

I also suggest you analyze the "morality" of the Bible. Lets take the story of Lot and his daughters as a case study. One could probably glean a better moral message than the Bible from Mad Magazine

Unless we're talking about the"Jefferson Bible"

cw10 wrote:
I think religion has some flaws as well, but I don't reject the philosophy. There are millions of function god loving people on earth who raise healthy families and are productive citizens. People who take religion literally don't get it either.


As there are also millions of people on Earth who don't care about god and go about their lives in a productive and ethical manner. Either way, that is irrelevant, since your assertion is that atheists have no moral framework to go by, and thus are fundamentally immoral due to their apparent "flexibility". Yet you still haven't met my challenge to demonstrate how religion as a framework has in any way made the human race more "moral", or prove that atheists are less moral than religious people like yourself. You can keep repeating yourself in different ways or you can answer the question... Until then, you're just blowing smoke


I don't remember ever citing the bible as the soul source of ethics, I talk about religion in general, but since you can't keep my story straight why am I still talking to you?

You keep asserting I'm christian by doing this, yet you claim that you're not. This is both inaccurate and disingenuous. I've explained my position many times, but you refuse to read it as I write it and substitute your own misinformed interpretation of it. This is why I keep insisting you have trouble parsing English.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Feb 2012, 5:32 am

cw10 wrote:
I don't remember ever citing the bible as the soul source of ethics, I talk about religion in general, but since you can't keep my story straight why am I still talking to you?


Where do Christian ethics come from? God? Where do any religious ethics come from? The works of religious literature. Either that or they're just personal ethics with a pointless supernatural bogeyman element.

cw10 wrote:
You keep asserting I'm christian by doing this, yet you claim that you're not. This is both inaccurate and disingenuous. I've explained my position many times, but you refuse to read it as I write it and substitute your own misinformed interpretation of it.


This is bull. Your position to begin with is as follows:

cw10 wrote:
If you don't believe in something, you'll believe in anything.


This is a pretty clear indication you consider those who don't believe in religious "accountability" (as you later elaborated) believe in "nothing" and are thus somehow more fallible. Did you forget you posted this? You cannot claim that in the context of this thread that is not what you were saying. I don't care if you're a Christian, a Zoroastrian, or a Satanist

cw10 wrote:
This is why I keep insisting you have trouble parsing English.


No, you keep acting this way because you have no actual arguments, so throwing insults around is your way of avoiding answering any of the questions or challenges I have presented to you. Clearly the only person wasting their time here is me, since you apparently do not have the capacity to engage in an intellectual discussion without resorting to weak logical fallacies, insults, and evasive tactics.


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do