why are feminist obsessed with Nice guys(TM)
Its as if I´d post a video of some strange US "self founded religion" leader, having 25 wifes and 95 kids and opinions from the millenium before jesus was born, and start referring about "todays global patriarchism". ^^
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Its as if I´d post a video of some strange US "self founded religion" leader, having 25 wifes and 95 kids and opinions from the millenium before jesus was born, and start referring about "todays global patriarchism". ^^
Right.
However, there are movements within movements.
There is "Feminism," and then there's what I'm referring to as "Feminists™". You can't win without unity within a greater movement. You don't help yourself (as a whole) by attacking extremists. You see that fairly consistently in political movements, as I mentioned earlier in re Repubs vs. Dems. If feminists display factionalism, i.e. moderate "men+women=EQUAL" vs. a more militant Feminists™ "men<women," with a moderate majority shouting down a vocal minority, feminists as a whole lost a faction that they could potentially use to their advantage in the long run. If a vocal minority of Feminists™ are able to effect change, it only benefits non-militant feminists. The reverse can't be said.
@ArrantParriah: You never hear Dems getting all hot about "single-payer" as opposed to the individual mandate. They're not totally stupid. If a large number of people knew that a few Dems were working towards single-payer, they might be less likely to vote for them. And there have been Dems opposed to ACA BECAUSE it wasn't single-payer. This, however, doesn't make news very much. However, you haven't seen any Dems working AGAINST ACA legislation, either…unless you count how many times Obama has selectively rewritten it, and even then there really hasn't been much opposition from the left on this. It's not in Dems best interest to oppose it. Repubs, on the other hand, seem to provide too much entertainment by being divided the way they are. The establishment kinda co-opted the Tea Party to win elections, and not long after seem to have done everything they can do to shut them up, especially considering the dirty tactics used to get rid of electable candidates from their own party. The thing is, there are always divisions within groups. It's only the extremes you hear about, and no movement has made any lasting marks without agreeing on the essentials and moving forward. Dems for the moment are able to sacrifice on certain issues to get what's most important to them passed through. Repubs have abandoned their conservative base by trying to get votes (gays, immigrants, etc.) that they'll never get. Unless something significant changes, Repubs will be staying home for the next elections, too.
sonofghandi
Veteran

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
You are a feminist.
I am a staunch feminist, and I am very perturbed by the fact that militant extremists have hijacked the name while ignoring the fundamental equality basis of the movement.
I am certain there are plenty of christians out there that feel the same way about the hate filled "christians" of the more extreme flavors.
If the scales ever tip too far the other way, then I will probably end up in the "opposite" movement, complaining about the male extremists who want to overthrow the female dominated world rather than achieve equality.
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche

This explains soooo much!! !
b.s,alot of guys who get laid,are married,have a gf, are
against feminist.there are women against feminist.
feminist and their hardcore leftist allies think
only bitter,cranky single guys hate them,which
is not true.You feminist and hardcore leftist are losing.
ok.
Do they go home and demand she fix them a sandwich and then beat her if she forgets to put mayo on it?
Why would anyone hate someone for wanting the same pay and rights?If you had a daughter wouldn't you want the same opportunities for her as men have?Or would you prefer that she get preggers at fourteen to a loser who treats her like crap?
_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi
AspergianMutantt
Veteran

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,782
Location: North Idaho. USA
sonofghandi
Veteran

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
ok.
So why are most MRA groups shouting about how much ground has already been lost and how much more they stand to lose?
By the way, not every feminist is a hardcore leftist, in fact some are quite politically conservative. And isn't being against discrimination a rallying cry for conservatives at times?
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
Last edited by sonofghandi on 13 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I guess because not to long ago we couldn't vote,own property,be in charge of our reproductive rights,and were pretty much considered the man's property.Some men (and a few women I suppose)thought this was a good thing,so men and women who thought otherwise made great efforts to level the playing field.
There really shouldn't be men's rights or woman's rights,but just human rights.
_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi
sonofghandi
Veteran

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
It shouldn't have to be.
While things have improved (and drastically) in the past century alone, if women weren't still systematically the victims of discrimination, then it would not bear the name "feminism."
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
sonofghandi
Veteran

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
"Oh, yes. I see that tons of woman always on my way to work, protesting before the parlament: "We dont want to be treated as equal humans! We dont want the same rights! We want MORE rights! We think we are of more worth and deserve to be treated with greater respect!" It's a viewpoint that holds that ALL men are scum and inferior. And where this is NOT the case, it IS the case that they demand men step aside and make every accommodation that they demand.
And this simply isn't the way the world works. At least not in the "man's world." If I got to demand every accommodation for my job to make it a success, I'd still be a public school teacher right now. Nobody in an entry level job gets his own personal assistant to run around fixing his mistakes to guarantee a promotion. Even if you have something on a management or executive level, you don't get a free pass from making mistakes and facing consequences. I'm self-employed, which basically means I'm a CEO. Just because I'm the CEO doesn't mean I've got clients breaking down the door to procure my services. I'm not really doing all that well at the moment, and if I'm going to grow my business, *I* have to take responsibility for things like finances and marketing. Talk about a glass ceiling! Hint: it only exists if YOU put it there. If there's no more upwards mobility for you in the company where you work, give yourself a promotion by seeking the job you want elsewhere, and don't stop looking for it until you get it.
Feminists™ aren't interested in ordinary upwards mobility. They see status as imposed by men for men's interests alone, women need not apply. It's "I'm a woman, and my kind have been oppressed for millennia. I'm ENTITLED to the top jobs, and YOU (men) are going to do all the work to put me there." Feminists™ would have a point if they stopped at equality. It's tit-for-tat dominance over men and demanding that men accommodate them along the way that I have the most trouble supporting.
And just to be clear, I'm referring to Feminists™ as a radical, extreme movement, what some may call "Feminazi." I'm not assuming that ALL feminists are like this, but it doesn't seem to me that feminists really have much of a voice in the media as Feminist™ radicals do. Saying all feminists are Feminists™ is like saying all nice guys are Nice Guys™. The problem is somehow we tend to be more attracted to the attention-getters, all the crazies whose views somehow get representation disproportionate to how many people actually buy into that ideology.
have any of the female feminists involved in this conversation said ANY of these problematic things that you mentioned here?
no.
and why is that?
because the kind of extreme feminists with the "loudest" voices you guys are talking about (the handful that have been mentioned that exist) are the only ones you guys here seem to pay attention to, the only sort of blogs you go looking for to quote in here, the only sort of youtube videos you link in these threads are about/made by the horrible all-too-common (apparently) FEMINAZI (god how i hate this f***ing word).
there are lots of feminists on this thread with what i would call pretty reasonable voices and opinions. and why is that?--because we actually represent THE LARGE MAJORITY of feminists--reasonable people who want to be treated like human beings. but you don't hear us. you only hear skrieking man-haters. whatev.
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
"Oh, yes. I see that tons of woman always on my way to work, protesting before the parlament: "We dont want to be treated as equal humans! We dont want the same rights! We want MORE rights! We think we are of more worth and deserve to be treated with greater respect!" It's a viewpoint that holds that ALL men are scum and inferior. And where this is NOT the case, it IS the case that they demand men step aside and make every accommodation that they demand.
And this simply isn't the way the world works. At least not in the "man's world." If I got to demand every accommodation for my job to make it a success, I'd still be a public school teacher right now. Nobody in an entry level job gets his own personal assistant to run around fixing his mistakes to guarantee a promotion. Even if you have something on a management or executive level, you don't get a free pass from making mistakes and facing consequences. I'm self-employed, which basically means I'm a CEO. Just because I'm the CEO doesn't mean I've got clients breaking down the door to procure my services. I'm not really doing all that well at the moment, and if I'm going to grow my business, *I* have to take responsibility for things like finances and marketing. Talk about a glass ceiling! Hint: it only exists if YOU put it there. If there's no more upwards mobility for you in the company where you work, give yourself a promotion by seeking the job you want elsewhere, and don't stop looking for it until you get it.
Feminists™ aren't interested in ordinary upwards mobility. They see status as imposed by men for men's interests alone, women need not apply. It's "I'm a woman, and my kind have been oppressed for millennia. I'm ENTITLED to the top jobs, and YOU (men) are going to do all the work to put me there." Feminists™ would have a point if they stopped at equality. It's tit-for-tat dominance over men and demanding that men accommodate them along the way that I have the most trouble supporting.
And just to be clear, I'm referring to Feminists™ as a radical, extreme movement, what some may call "Feminazi." I'm not assuming that ALL feminists are like this, but it doesn't seem to me that feminists really have much of a voice in the media as Feminist™ radicals do. Saying all feminists are Feminists™ is like saying all nice guys are Nice Guys™. The problem is somehow we tend to be more attracted to the attention-getters, all the crazies whose views somehow get representation disproportionate to how many people actually buy into that ideology.
have any of the female feminists involved in this conversation said ANY of these problematic things that you mentioned here?
no.
and why is that?
because the kind of extreme feminists with the "loudest" voices you guys are talking about (the handful that have been mentioned that exist) are the only ones you guys here seem to pay attention to, the only sort of blogs you go looking for to quote in here, the only sort of youtube videos you link in these threads are about/made by the horrible all-too-common (apparently) FEMINAZI (god how i hate this f***ing word).
there are lots of feminists on this thread with what i would call pretty reasonable voices and opinions. and why is that?--because we actually represent THE LARGE MAJORITY of feminists--reasonable people who want to be treated like human beings. but you don't hear us. you only hear skrieking man-haters. whatev.
EXCELLENT. This is what we need to see from feminists.
One question, though: Can you show that you have engaged, as you put it, "shrieking man-haters" in countering their hate-speech towards men and their misrepresentation of themes central to your view of feminism, i.e. equality over superiority?
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Feminist professor loses job after Islamist group demands... |
29 May 2025, 12:31 am |
Elon Musk is obsessed with America’s falling birth rate |
07 May 2025, 2:11 am |
Nice to meet you all! |
17 Jun 2025, 7:12 pm |
What to do when people aren't nice?
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
05 Apr 2025, 12:36 pm |