Page 13 of 16 [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

27 Jul 2018, 11:04 am

^ I'd reply, but I'm trying not to exacerbate the bickering on this thread.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

27 Jul 2018, 11:30 am

Us WrongPlanet denizens are more NT than we think we are.....



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

27 Jul 2018, 1:58 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Us WrongPlanet denizens are more NT than we think we are.....


We're just as human as the rest of 'em.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

27 Jul 2018, 3:47 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Us WrongPlanet denizens are more NT than we think we are.....


We're just as human as the rest of 'em.


INHO, Aspies aren't more logical, they're just better at rationalizing their emotions.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


cubedemon6073
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,960

27 Jul 2018, 4:21 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Us WrongPlanet denizens are more NT than we think we are.....


We're just as human as the rest of 'em.


INHO, Aspies aren't more logical, they're just better at rationalizing their emotions.


Can you please explain further?



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

28 Jul 2018, 1:45 am

What I have seen in my brother, is speech that would be described as "social obliviousness".

1. A self logic valuing his perceptions of "truth" (that may/may not be sound logic).
2. Very direct communications (often offensively so, though, he thinks he's just "telling it like it is").
3. Lieing/"Hidden agenda"/manipulative speech seems less likely as it would contradict #1, and #2.

His self logic > your feelings > social etiquette > cops threatening him (it happened)


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

28 Jul 2018, 9:19 pm

This is why we need universal healthcare. $950,000 medical bill?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-wom ... pital-bill

Yes she did purchase travel insurance but it decided to not pay the bill because of her "pre existing condition." What was her pre existing condition? Pregnancy?


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2018, 12:33 am

League_Girl wrote:
This is why we need universal healthcare. $950,000 medical bill?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-wom ... pital-bill

Yes she did purchase travel insurance but it decided to not pay the bill because of her "pre existing condition." What was her pre existing condition? Pregnancy?


That's not only insane, it's totally unacceptable!


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

29 Jul 2018, 11:03 pm

League_Girl wrote:
This is why we need universal healthcare. $950,000 medical bill?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-wom ... pital-bill

Yes she did purchase travel insurance but it decided to not pay the bill because of her "pre existing condition." What was her pre existing condition? Pregnancy?

That's why we don't want "universal health care".

The taxpayer will be stuck paying millions of dollars for foreign tourists.


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2018, 11:07 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
This is why we need universal healthcare. $950,000 medical bill?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-wom ... pital-bill

Yes she did purchase travel insurance but it decided to not pay the bill because of her "pre existing condition." What was her pre existing condition? Pregnancy?

That's why we don't want "universal health care".

The taxpayer will be stuck paying millions of dollars for foreign tourists.


That does not deter me from wanting universal healthcare. I dare say, most Americans wouldn't have a problem with giving help to a foreigner.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


SZWell
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2017
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 397
Location: Orlando, FL

29 Jul 2018, 11:36 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
This is why we need universal healthcare. $950,000 medical bill?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-wom ... pital-bill

Yes she did purchase travel insurance but it decided to not pay the bill because of her "pre existing condition." What was her pre existing condition? Pregnancy?

That's why we don't want "universal health care".

The taxpayer will be stuck paying millions of dollars for foreign tourists.


That does not deter me from wanting universal healthcare. I dare say, most Americans wouldn't have a problem with giving help to a foreigner.


Caring for other humans isn't conservative


_________________
Following my footsteps


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2018, 11:47 pm

SZWell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
This is why we need universal healthcare. $950,000 medical bill?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/canadian-wom ... pital-bill

Yes she did purchase travel insurance but it decided to not pay the bill because of her "pre existing condition." What was her pre existing condition? Pregnancy?

That's why we don't want "universal health care".

The taxpayer will be stuck paying millions of dollars for foreign tourists.


That does not deter me from wanting universal healthcare. I dare say, most Americans wouldn't have a problem with giving help to a foreigner.


Caring for other humans isn't conservative


Guess not. The right always says how they're all for helping people in need, but it's apparently them who decides who the truly needy are. And very few of those in need fit the right's criteria for who is actually deserving.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,186
Location: Adelaide, Australia

30 Jul 2018, 5:07 pm

Bataar wrote:
The healthcare market should be treated the same as every other commercial market. Prices would go down dramatically. Look how much the original iPhone cost when it first came out. $600 with a two year contract. Now, you can get a much better phone for significantly less money if not free. Did the government mandate smart phone pricing? Did the government mandate what apps and features smart phones must have? Of course not, the free market drove specs and features up and prices down. Yeah, absolute top of the line, flagship phones are expensive, but phones much better than the original iPhone are considerably less.

The same would happen with healthcare. Imagine being able to buy from any provider in the nation and being able to buy just the coverage you wanted/needed. With so much competition, companies would be lowering prices and increasing services to get more customers.


Sorry but Moore's Law is for computing devices, not for healthcare. Doctors are expensive and shall remain so because it costs a lot of money to train a doctor and most people don't have what it takes to become one. You know as well as I know that scarcity drives the up the price. The doctor's time is scarce. Thanks to Moore's Law you can buy a given number of transistors on a chip for a thousandth of the price after 20 years. But in 20 years you won't be able to buy an hour of a doctors time for a thousandth of the price or even half the price.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


Magna
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,932

30 Jul 2018, 7:25 pm

My healthcare costs in insurance premiums (not including any deductible, copay, etc) for me and my family come to around 25% of the money I make each year. It's about doubled in the last 6 years or so.

I would feel a lot better about the Obamacare if, rather than paying 25% of my income to simply have health insurance, my cost and others in my same situation could be reduced down to, say, 10% and those that pay less than 10% of their entire income toward health insurance could increase the amount they pay up to 10%. To me that would be more fair.

For those who may rightly be on disability, Medicaid, General Assistance and don't earn enough to meet the 10%, it's a logical assumption and most likely a correct one that they're already getting free healthcare and don't really have a "dog in the fight"?

The flavor of an argument that I've heard before related to this kind of thing (when a person like me complains that 25% of my income toward health insurance is wrong) goes something like: "Aww, quit your yappin', sucker. Be glad those of us who don't pay that much but have any number of reasons and justifications why not don't yell louder and make the system charge you 50% of your income!! !!"

"But, but!"
"Make it 75%! ! You have no right to complain!"



Magna
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,932

30 Jul 2018, 7:38 pm

I worked in healthcare for about ten years and during the span for two different health insurance companies including in the area of paying medical claims submitted by doctors, labs, clinics, pharmacies, hospitals and durable medical equipment DME providers. I'll call all of these "Providers".

"Providers" enjoy a reciprocally beneficial relationships with health insurance companies.

Many of you are probably aware that health insurance companies pay "contracted rates" for services to "Providers" that are in their "network". It would seem on the surface that health insurance companies want those "contracted rates" to be as low as possible. They care, to a degree, but not much. Why? Higher rates means health insurance companies simply have to pass the increased costs onto consumers in the form of higher insurance premiums. It's not really the health insurance companies money so keeping healthcare costs from skyrocketing in the last few decades is not a big concern.

Here's an example of how the game is played in relation to most all charges which are routine and established (strip out the experimental "new" charges start start very high and then get a bit lower over time):

"Provider" bills $400 for an office visit.

Insurance company says they'll only pay $100 for an office visit with "Provider" writing off the other $300 as a loss.

"Provider" negotiates the next time around with the insurance company to now pay a rate of $200 for an office visit and the insurance company agrees.

"Provider" then starts billing $500 or $600 for an office visit (an exorbitantly and unrealistically high charge).

The game continues in that cycle and the costs continue to go up and up and up and up.

That game is applied not only for office visits, but anything. We've all heard of the $50 tablet of Tylenol the hospital bills for. That kind of thing isn't a joke and it's done for the same reason the office visit is billed that high on purpose. The health insurance company won't pay $50 per Tylenol, but perhaps they'll end up paying a contracted rate of $10 per Tylenol tablet. Something that should have cost .10 cents.....



SZWell
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2017
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 397
Location: Orlando, FL

01 Aug 2018, 3:21 pm

https://twitter.com/foxandfriends/statu ... 6541484032


_________________
Following my footsteps