Nades wrote:
Mascots. The royal family here have no power. They own a lot of land and are individually very rich (understandably to many people's distain) but they pose no barrier to wealth and are never in competition with others.
Just checked, the Core Monarch Grant is a huge part of their revenue stream. How can they have this grant when they own real estate like this?Take away Prince Charles' bloodline, and what kind of competition would he have to go through to get this? They really didn't compete but simply declared themselves the winners.
I have some doubts about whether you recognize the core of capitalism: "The greater the ability, the greater the reward."
I'd like to know what you think of this as a conservative British person Belief in capitalism
Nades wrote:
Risks and income dumped into a company also counts, perhaps moreso than hours itself.
Being a corporate leader in a monopoly industry is a profession with no risk and high returns. The core skills are something that is illegal even in capitalist countries.If you want to talk about "antitrust law", "inheritance tax" or something like that, I have already said it, I believe you will have a bright future, relying on your ability to reform rather than this BS capitalism
Nades wrote:
Wealth passed down through the generations isn't actually as common as it's made out to be?
That’s your left’s contribution. In fact, I think finding mistakes and making small reforms is the key to capitalism surviving today. It was also the key to the death of the Soviet Union.
Britain passed a series of welfare reform measures and still insisted that it was a capitalist country.
Makes me, a fundamentalist person, feel uncomfortable
Nades wrote:
Not really, they'll just leave the country.
Not really, The rich would secretly lower taxes and spread the word that countries with lower taxes would see famine, massacres, and the restoration of feudalism.
_________________
Friendly, Ignorant, Pessimistic, Cynical, Gibberish