TM wrote:
On the other hand, if followers of Islam want to convince the rest of the world that "Islam is a religion of peace" not killing people, rioting and otherwise reacting with violence every time someone says something negative about Islam is a good start.
Uh, dude, plenty of us are doing just that. It just doesn't exactly create international incidents. You ever tried being so peaceful and tolerant that people hear about it on the news with any frequency?
DC wrote:
It does seem to be more the action of a system that is closer to fascism or Stalinism than something that is compatible with modern secular democratic values doesn't it?
It's not the action of any system. It's the action of human beings.
rpcarnell wrote:
Any religion or ideology that resorts to censorship or violence when criticized is absolutely a threat, and also ridiculous.
Religions and ideologies
don't resort to censorship or violence when criticized, people do that.
Fnord wrote:
How could any religion be a threat when it is based on the hallucinatory ramblings of a man who was a pedophile, a polygamist, and a womanizer?
What an incredibly original and thought-provoking comment, Fnord.
DC wrote:
Yup I was and how wonderful that you and I can carry on a conversation, get offended at one another because of what we say and still not feel the need to murder people. It is almost civilised....
Almost civilized? No way that could be possible, I haven't murdered anyone for days. So it can't be that much of an accomplishment if evil terrorist scum like me can do that, right?