auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas
28 May 2019, 6:07 am
28 May 2019, 9:45 pm
auntblabby wrote:
i've read over the years, that lifestyle changes are insufficient, what is long-known to be needed is politically incorrect but here goes- a drastic reduction in human and animal population. whether this is self-imposed or imposed from without, is in our power, at least in theory.
Agenda 21 on steroids with a fascist salute.
Quote:
The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st century. It has been affirmed and had a few modifications at subsequent UN conferences. Its aim is achieving global sustainable development. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Since 2015, Sustainable Development Goals are included in the Agenda 2030.[citation needed] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
Quote:
Green space, clean energy, increased urban density...and global dictatorship. It’s hard to see how all of these things could connect, but — according to a popular right wing conspiracy theory — a UN resolution aimed at sustainable development could pave the way.
Theorists argue that Agenda 21, a 23-year-old non-binding UN resolution that suggests ways for governments and NGOs to promote sustainable development, is the linchpin in a plot to subjugate humanity under an eco-totalitarian regime. One of its most outspoken critics, American Policy Center president Tom DeWeese, has described the resolution as “a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind”. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable ... ainability
Theorists argue that Agenda 21, a 23-year-old non-binding UN resolution that suggests ways for governments and NGOs to promote sustainable development, is the linchpin in a plot to subjugate humanity under an eco-totalitarian regime. One of its most outspoken critics, American Policy Center president Tom DeWeese, has described the resolution as “a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind”. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable ... ainability
https://youtu.be/-b5aW08ivHU
29 May 2019, 2:30 am
02 Jun 2019, 3:36 pm
03 Jun 2019, 6:38 pm
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
i've read over the years, that lifestyle changes are insufficient, what is long-known to be needed is politically incorrect but here goes- a drastic reduction in human and animal population. whether this is self-imposed or imposed from without, is in our power, at least in theory.
Agenda 21 on steroids with a fascist salute.
Quote:
The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st century. It has been affirmed and had a few modifications at subsequent UN conferences. Its aim is achieving global sustainable development. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Since 2015, Sustainable Development Goals are included in the Agenda 2030.[citation needed] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
Quote:
Green space, clean energy, increased urban density...and global dictatorship. It’s hard to see how all of these things could connect, but — according to a popular right wing conspiracy theory — a UN resolution aimed at sustainable development could pave the way.
Theorists argue that Agenda 21, a 23-year-old non-binding UN resolution that suggests ways for governments and NGOs to promote sustainable development, is the linchpin in a plot to subjugate humanity under an eco-totalitarian regime. One of its most outspoken critics, American Policy Center president Tom DeWeese, has described the resolution as “a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind”. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable ... ainability
Theorists argue that Agenda 21, a 23-year-old non-binding UN resolution that suggests ways for governments and NGOs to promote sustainable development, is the linchpin in a plot to subjugate humanity under an eco-totalitarian regime. One of its most outspoken critics, American Policy Center president Tom DeWeese, has described the resolution as “a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind”. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable ... ainability
https://youtu.be/-b5aW08ivHU
I won't say they are all that crazy.
Medium.com article
Published by BJ Campbell 4/20/2018
https://bit.ly/2IfguT8
03 Jun 2019, 6:48 pm
I'm afraid of both the left and the right. I don't want an actual violent war to happen between the extremists on both sides. I think I would be a dead man if that happened and my family would possibly be hurt or killed too. 
