Scalia Death Conflicting Reports Coming In

Post Reply New Topic

I took her meaning that the Democrats will be congratulating themselves for murdering Scalia. And I'm accused of being partisan and one sided!! !! ! I think I should throw paranoid in there, too.

His own family were the ones who refused an autopsy.

So I guess his family will be doing high fives because they were all in on the plot!

That is so funny because I think the same way when I have to try to explain something like this ENTIRE thread to the Left.

have you been cleverly hiding these explanations in 'next'?

Same to you buddy. Nothing of substance in there. Kind of like Ronald McDonaldtrump's skull.

This whole thread is pointless and based an asinine assumptions.

I still don't understand, if None of the people that were present are to be trusted, the family is not to be trusted, the doctor who gave his/her input to the jop, the jop can't be trusted, the law there, even fox news.. Why in the world would a lone pathologist make a sliver of difference in this train of thought?

With hindsight, do i think an autopsy should have been done? If i were the jop, i probably would have called for one. Though, if i then heard about measurable health problems from the doctor and family, the request from the religious family not to, and on-site law saying they had no suspicions, for a heavy 79 year old man, i might decide to just honor the wishes of the family.

Given that such a decision is neither illegal, nor unheard of, it wouldn't even occur to me that someone would take that simple action and run to the conspiracy hills. I would do the same whether he was left, right, or upside-down. However, I can't help but wonder, is this outrage really about a potential murder and corruption and would be the same if if the current president were a republican and scalia on the left, or is it simply upset because scalia was far right and the current president isn't? it strongly reads as the latter.

Know what the word "personal" means?
Guess not...

This from you of all people.

do you?
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attack on an argument made by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, rather than attacking the argument directly.
maybe you should stop issuing personal attacks if you're sensitive about them. just a thought.

Well at least you are trying to understand. The big deal is that Scalia was the one vote on the Supreme Court that was a sure vote for the Repubs. Now that he is dead, Asswipe (yes you all heard me - that's my pet name for him) has more leeway to push through what he wants because the vote will no longer be 5-4. That's why I put the post about Scalia being the deciding vote. Scalia is dead 6 days after he was the deciding vote on the greenhouse gas emissions that Asswipe wanted. There are also decisions being made on unions and abortion, etc. that Scalia's vote would be very important. We haven't heard from Scalia's doctor what ailments he had (I already said all of this in another post), all we are going on is what this Cinderela woman is saying "I wave my wand and pronounce you dead over the phone!" The onsite sheriff who said there was not foul play was appointed by Asswipe (which I already said in another post, as well). The ranch was owned by a well known Democrat. This is a freaking murder mystery writing itself. Geez. Did you read any of my other posts? Asswipe has this one year to push through all of his crap and I don't think it would be beneath him to knock someone off. Afterall, that's the Chicago way and that's how you get Scalia!

Scalia was 79 years old and died of a heart attack (myocardial infarction) which is hardly a rare way for a 79 year old man to die. Sooner or later we shall all die. Some of us will die of myocardial infarctions. That his how my Dad, died.

Justice Scalia was not a light weight. We was carrying around some pounds so heart failure is hardly a surprise.

THERE IS NO PROOF THAT HE HAD AN MI. Show me the damn proof!!

Next.

Posting conspiracy theories on a forum full of autistic people? Lol, really? As if that sort of subject isn't prone to flame wars enough as it is before getting aspies involved.

The words "conspiracy theory" again? More hot air. I want facts of what the guy died from. Except you need an autopsy for that, don't ya? Duh.

Next.

ok. let's take this the other direction since you are moving the goalposts w/r/t cause of death.

Let's say that for giggles, Obama had him offed.

Why now, when he's already on his way out?
The timing would have been far more advantageous had it occured earlier in his presidency.