Anarchy

Post Reply New Topic

I'll have to correct you there... I've never posted it once. Chever just over uses it when he talks to me so you probably think I use it because you see it whenever I'm in the same thread as him.. I guess I give him a headache

I look forward to meeting Hypatia.

Bingo on Fridays!

I hear she's pretty self-conscious about the whole abalone-shell thing, so be sensitive.

Words don't mean whatever you want them to. If you took 'banana' to mean 'unicorn', it wouldn't mean there are no bananas.



No, they ask for 'proof' of evolution and then don't get it, of course.

Don't try to tar me with that brush; it's distasteful.



Everything I write is in maths, so why does that matter?



...said the music major.



Here are "real experts":

http://www.carlton.srsd119.ca/chemical/ ... efault.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/sciproof.html
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/publi ... policy.pdf
http://edf5481-01.su00.fsu.edu/OnProof.html
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/pudding.htm
http://eport2.cgc.maricopa.edu/publishe ... shtml?8/28
http://cstl-csm.semo.edu/journet/GeneralStuff/Snow.htm
http://plantphys.info/plants_human/scimeth.shtml
http://www.sbs.utexas.edu/genetics/Lite ... bility.htm

No scientist would ever say there is really such a thing as 'scientific proof'.



Then I'm in luck because I have a whole bunch of exact ordinary differential equations to solve and surely a man such as yourself, whose intellect clearly towers over my own, will be able to integrate them with ease. Should I typeset them and send you the PDF tomorrow?

And brush your teeth, you incredibly unfunny Briton.



Well, if she hasn't healed up down there, Trung Nhi and Trung Trac drowned themselves, so they're in good condition, right?

Using a definition in a dictionary doesn't count as making words mean whatever I want them to mean.

You've already tarred yourself.

The English language isn't maths.

Notice how you are not one of them.

No scientist would ever say there is such a things as absolute scientific proof. Fixed.

Still stands.

Falsely believing that your definition of the word proof is the only correct definition also does not make you right. You can b***h about linguistics all you want. You are still unable to understand similes, metaphors, synonyms, colloquial speech and the English language in general. There is no absolute definition of any one word. Intelligent people can usually puzzle out what definition is being used and since you cannot, this just says to me that you are a dumbass. Since you seem to be incapable of understanding plain English, I shall try to relay the following in terms you should understand. If you still want to continue to waste your own time by persisting in your idiosyncratic BS, then this will serve as even more evidence to support this and will also serve as evidence to suggest that you are just using this, quote, argument, unquote, as a straw man, which, in turn, serves as evidence to suggest that your first point is completely without merit, intrinsic value, or has any basis, in truth, facts, proof, evidence and/or data whatsoever. All of this added up together serves as evidence to further highlight your acute lack of intelligence, logic or reason, which, in turn, serves as evidence to suggest you are nothing but a vindictive know-nothing whose purpose is to spread dissent in an otherwise perfectly good thread. Your evident rudeness, abrasiveness, and die-hard clinging to obviously fallacious arguments, evidently serves as evidence to support all of this. You also completely fail to understand sarcasm, irony, satire and obscure humour if not just humour in general as well as failing to spot obvious trolling. Using all of this evidence, I thus conclude, and put it to you, that you are a complete boob. Get back to the point, or simply go and kill yourself. You fail at humour, you fail at language and you fail at life. Magnus and others are trying to have a decent conversation about a relevant topic whilst all you care about is brainwashing others with your arrogant misconceptions.

This is all beautifully funny. I am trolling you and its working. You're just too much of an idiot to see that. Stop feeding the trolls. It's not productive and makes you look like a bigger moron than you already are.
I tend to ignore most things you say anyway as it just comes across as the inane babblings of a dribbley. Screaming “HURGH!! !! YOU ARE WRONG!!1ONE11ELEVEN!!1!! DUH!!ONE!!” is not an effective method of conveying your ideals and points to other people and tends to make others ignore you even if you are right. You are nothing but a bigoted sociopath.


List of chevers continuous fallacies: -
Argumentum ad nauseam: -
-relying upon the repetition of a single argument whilst ignoring other valid arguments, to counter those other arguments.
Argument ad populum: -
-proposing a claim is true solely because many people believe it to be true .
Horse Laugh: -
-presenting the opponent's argument in a way that appears ridiculous to the extent of creating a straw man of the actual argument.
Appeal to authority: -
-proposing assertions are true because of the position or authority of the person asserting it
Straw Man argument: -
-describing a position that superficially resembles the opponent's actual view, yet is easier to refute, then attributes that position to the opponent.
Texas sharpshooter fallacy: -
-using information that has no relationship but interpreting and manipulating until it appears to have meaning.
Special pleading: -
-reference to vocabulary that is owned by a distinct community with sole rights to assess meaning and application
-assertion that the opponent lacks the qualifications necessary to comprehend a point of view
-assertion that literally nobody has the qualifications necessary to comprehend a point of view

Also, Genetic fallacy, Cherry Picking, Hasty Generalization, No true Scotsman, Moving the goalpost, Intentional fallacy, afirming a disjunct and Ignoratio elenchi.

Did you not read any of these links:

http://www.carlton.srsd119.ca/chemical/ ... efault.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/sciproof.html
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/publi ... policy.pdf
http://edf5481-01.su00.fsu.edu/OnProof.html
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/pudding.htm
http://eport2.cgc.maricopa.edu/publishe ... shtml?8/28
http://cstl-csm.semo.edu/journet/GeneralStuff/Snow.htm
http://plantphys.info/plants_human/scimeth.shtml
http://www.sbs.utexas.edu/genetics/Lite ... bility.htm

Yeah, why bother checking university science and philosophy departments when a general, non-expert English dictionary source is clearly superior



So, since your intellect dwarfs mine easily, are you doing those exact ordinary diff eqs for me or not?

You elided my question from your response. I found this strange because you had to subject everything else I said to a torrent of verbal diarrhea, while being unable to answer a very simple yes/no question.

And since you are the king of logic and reason, a veritable Boole or De Morgan, I'd like to enjoy the awe-inspiring profundity of your own work. Here's a humble sample of mine:

http://math.wikia.com/wiki/De_Morgan%27s_laws
http://math.wikia.com/wiki/Integration_by_parts
http://math.wikia.com/wiki/Proof_of_Che ... inequality
http://math.wikia.com/wiki/Proof_of_unb ... r_variance

Granted, it's not much yet, but I'm sure it's a hell of a lot better than anything you've ever done. I may only be a second-year student, but I know when someone's bloviating about skills he doesn't actually have, something you are very clearly doing. For starters, you aren't enrolled as a student in computer science or mathematics (I'm in both). These formally codify logic in case you didn't know, and if I were really as shit-brained as you say I am, I wouldn't have made it this far. Furthermore, you haven't shown any independent experience in these fields either. Such would have been acceptable; Leibniz didn't have a formal math education either. But you have neither. In short, you're just bragging. I'd frankly be surprised if you'd ever seen a symbolic logic proof, much less written one. (I've written dozens by now.)

Hell, I'd like to see you make it through the first chapter of my piddly second-year computer science text, much less everything I'll have to take on as an upper undergraduate and graduate student...

Disintegration topic

To me, anarchy reminds me of the chaos that erupted in my grade 5 class when the teacher left the room after having a breakdown due to the teaching load of 50 students. Wow, I am glad that was a distant memory, but not so distant that I decided we need some politically stable infrastructure with a workable history.
In Canada, we call this Peace, Order and Good Government. This has evolved over time, and will continue, albeit slowly. Removing the source of order (eg the teacher) created a wild mess that upset my Aspie sensibilities. As I recall I did not engage in the free-for-all. It is not my style.

Now, when I think of anarchy, I visualize my youngest daughter's room.

Hurry up and develop and aneurysm

Trolling is not a repsonse, and rhetorical questions are not real questions. Also, it is spelt eluded.
What is the dictionary, then? Did Satan put it here to trick us, or was it developed by a modern human with a disease? Quick, go Google search a few propaganda sites! A scientist who can't use words correctly is still a scientist who can't use words correctly.


Quoting open-source encyclopedias is not evidence or proof. I've written programs and algorithms smarter than you.
[sarcasm]P(A), or the probability that the student is a girl regardless of any other information. Since the observers sees a random student, meaning that all students have the same probability of being observed, and the fraction of girls among the students is 40%, this probability equals 0.4.
P(A'), or the probability that the student is a boy regardless of any other information (A' is the complementary event to A). This is 60%, or 0.6.
P(B|A), or the probability of the student wearing trousers given that the student is a girl. As they are as likely to wear skirts as trousers, this is 0.5.
P(B|A'), or the probability of the student wearing trousers given that the student is a boy. This is given as 1.
P(B), or the probability of a (randomly selected) student wearing trousers regardless of any other information. Since P(B) = P(B|A)P(A) + P(B|A')P(A'), this is 0.5×0.4 + 1×0.6 = 0.8.

Also, 99 by the power of 14 = 8,687,458,127,689,783,079,736,908,601 Hey look everbody I'm smart![/sarcasm]

Wrong. I didn't say I was an expert or had experience in either field, I said I knew more than you generally, which is most likely true considering you have no clue on how to apply diction correctly amongst a wealth of other things. I know lots of things in lots of different areas and, from what I gather, you only know things regarding two specific areas, as a result I am able to do a host of things that contribute to my ability to function in society.

So you're like the rain man then? Still does not provide evidence that you are anything other than a dribbley.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.




Stop posting. I have long since stopped paying attention to what you are saying whatsoever. Stop feeding the trolls, stop feeding the trolls, stop feeding the trolls and lastly stop feeding the trolls. Nothing you can say can validate your opinion or points. You lack the mental faculties do understand plain English let alone anything else so go away and study up.

Once again, ample evidence of your profound mental deficiency.

If you click the history, you'll notice that the articles were written almost entirely by me (username C.hever)

And this got graded...



Incidentally, no one else in the class did the proof like that ... including the teacher.



Source code please. You can use pastebin you know.



I can do a lot of other things.

For example, my friends Florentina and Pattaraporn said that I pick up on tone and difficult phonemes such as 'ฏ' pretty quickly for a Westerner. I'd like to be an engineer / educator in the poor rural Isan area (I have a good command of geography, too) and it seems I would be ideally suited to do so

...which is the kind of life most crusty, toothless Britons can only dream of.



You are spending more time replying to me than I am replying to you, so the net waste of time is on your end...

Now are you going to do those ODE's for me or not?

In due time.

I can learn anything. I chose against pursuing careers in IT, Science and such becuase these were too easy and unfulfilling.

This just says it all.

Lol. When I'm earning over £800 an hour, we'll see. Especially when I'm earning £100-£200 for every free-lance programming job I get. Okay so all us Britons can only dream of such a job, hmm, let me see, one of my friends is earning £500 a week as an assistant engineer and they are not even out of college yet, one of my friends has started his own business, my grandad owns a building firm, one of my uncles is a director of a building firm and a funeral director firm, my friend's dad owns a building firm. We're so hard up, lol.

Unless you formulate your answers in less than 2 minutes then no. Also, copying and pasting from a word document of pre-formulated responses and editing them slightly to better fit the situation is not really time-consuming. Besides, I'm not wasting my time at all. I'm deliberately aggrevating you for my own entertainment and it's working.

Duh huh, right, you don't have it.



Bwa ha ha ha, right, understanding the Universe itself is 'easy' and 'unfulfilling'. No wonder Britain is no longer a world superpower. Jealous much?

If you really found such things easy, you would have been able to answer the question I posed several posts ago.



Racist much? The last syllable is pronounced more like the English word 'pawn' btw.



That implies little about quality of life, lol. Making eight hundred pounds an hour in a s**thole would cancel out the monetary gain.



Then the feeling's mutual. (Apparently you care enough to whine about it on your myspace.)

Spend less time on /b/ and more time studying and you might not be such a loser...

Chever, congrats on the proofs.

I can't believe this is still going and it's way off the topic.

Here is a song about trolls.[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xmRVDBtIt0[/youtube]

The moral of the story is that trolls just need to be loved. Only then will they turn into a real person.

Herr Mannilig (the troll song)

Early one morning before the sun did rise
And the birds sang their sweet song
The mountain troll proposed to the fair squire
She had a false deceitful tongue
Sir Mannelig, Sir Mannelig won`t you marry me
For all that I`ll gladly give you
You may answer only yes or no
Will you do so or noTo you I will give the twelve great steeds
That graze in a shady grove
Never has a saddle been mounted on their backs
Nor had a bit in their mouths
To you I will give the twelve fine mills
That stand between Tillo and Terno
The mill stones are made of the reddest brass
And the wheels are silver-laden
To you I will give the gilded sword
That jingles from fifteen gold rings
And strike with it in battle as you will
On the battlefield you will conquerTo you I will give a brand new shirt
The lustrous best for to wear
It is not sewn with needle or thread
But crocheted of the whitest silkGifts such as these I would gladly receive
If you were a Christian woman
But I know you are the worst mountain troll
From the spawn of Necken and the devilThe mountain troll ran out the doorShe wailed and she shrieked so loudly
&quotHad I gotten that handsome squire
From my torment I would be free now”

Sir Mannelig, Sir Mannelig won`t you marry me
For all that I`ll gladly give you
You may answer only yes or no
Will you do so or no

Techstepgener8tion wrote:

Why wouldn't you want to talk to me about politics. (sigh)
I hate politics actually. It's unfortunate that we need them at this time to keep the wild monkeys from getting out of control.
Jul and Accelerator wrote some great posts, check them out.

Lololol Magnus XD

Yeah, LOL, I know what they are, and how to write them.

And btw:



Or in other words:





Here's another song about trolls:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xspq3JGzJUk[/youtube]

I can translate the lyrics if you like.