Is Atheism a threat to Freedom
I'm going to quote the part that you said which led to my comment about you being intolerant.
So don't try to weasel out of it, what you said seems to be how you actually feel about people whom are religious.
i stand by what i said. "all humans have value in the eyes of god" is less complex than "helping other people makes the world a better place." the first statement is very much "because i said so" compared to the second statement's "it's complicated but seems to be productive."
i suppose i could go the long way and point out that if they "helped (dent) out of their religious principles..." they would still be acting on principles constructed by humans (not an imaginary deity) and that, by adding a (superfluous) supernatural reason, you are over complicating the matter.
but i don't think you'd go along with that. i think that, for you, religion (and god) function as a short-cut. so long as you refuse to accept that your short-cut is actually more complicated than "because god said so," i will consider your assumption of their motivation to be less complex.
by all means, though. keep calling me "intolerant."
_________________
Waltur the Walrus Slayer,
Militant Asantist.
"BLASPHEMER!! !! !! !!" (according to AngelRho)
Yeah, and give it a few centuries and maybe people will no longer believe the revolutionary war happened. That George Washington didn't exist, etc.
Again you have to look in context, because I'm sure you can take a piece from one part of the bible and take it completely out of context to contradict another part of the Bible.
Also didn't Jesus say, "Let he whom is without sin cast the first stone."
From a Biblical standpoint, the new testament trumps the old testament.
bolded: hilarious in this context.
You're taking it out of context again.
I know that I have the diplomatic tact of freight train. That said, I have no personal animousity towards you, I don't think that you aren't intelligent.
I do think Atheism has serious flaws and on this issue it is my belief that you are wrong. Further for the record wasn't it either you or one of your other friends that said go ahead and post a topic like this on Atheism.
"let he whom is without sin cast the first stone" doesn't apply to the context of a thread titled "Is Atheism a threat to Freedom?"
also:
Post that thread. Seriously, please do it.
also also:
which i'm quoting at you because you said:
and i wanted to do something other than point out how silly it looks to see "Atheism" perpetually capitalized.
all of this being relevant because, according to some guy going by the name of "Inuyasha" on this forum:
according to this same "Inuyasha,"
but judging from the rest of this posters comments, i'd say that last quote is more of a rule he's trying to enforce than an honest and genuine observation.
_________________
Waltur the Walrus Slayer,
Militant Asantist.
"BLASPHEMER!! !! !! !!" (according to AngelRho)
@ waltur
I have largely been targetting the mindset of Atheism not individuals whom happen to be Atheists.
Atheism is basically a proper name for a religion, whether you choose to recognize the fact it is in fact a religion isn't my problem.
You also neglected to point out the context in which I made the remark you are quoting, was it accidental or was it deliberate to try to cast me in the worst possible light? I'm hoping for the former but suspecting the latter.
I wasn't the one that made comments insinuating that people whom are Christians/Jews/Muslims/etc. are of lesser intelligence than Atheists. Furthermore, I did not make any comment insulting Atheists implying that they lacked intelligence.
Because the revolutionary war was fought by angels with flaming swords, and George Washington had magical powers, right?
Again you have to look in context, because I'm sure you can take a piece from one part of the bible and take it completely out of context to contradict another part of the Bible.
Your use of the words "out of context" is very whimsical. You can go look in your own Bible to see that the context in no way justifies the text.
"It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." (Luke 16:17 NAB)
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place." (Matthew 5:17 NAB)
"All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for refutation, for correction, and for training in righteousness..." (2 Timothy 3:16 NAB)
"Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." (2 Peter 20-21 NAB)
"Whoever curses father or mother shall die" (Mark 7:10 NAB)
“He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.” (Matthew 15:4-7)
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell." [Matthew 5:27-30]
If you doubt the context, go find it yourself. I gave you the verse numbers. Presumably you have a Bible. You go check the context and quote me back the parts where Jesus goes "just kidding, mate".
Except it's not a religion, it's the absence of religion. It's not an idea one buys into. It's simply the state of not having bought into a particular idea. Equivalent to not believing in Santa Claus.
But you did make the comment that atheism is a threat to freedom, and you have yet to demonstrate that theism is the prerequisite for freedom, which it would have to be in order for an absence of theism to be a threat to it.
I have largely been targetting the mindset of Atheism not individuals whom happen to be Atheists.
Atheism is basically a proper name for a religion, whether you choose to recognize the fact it is in fact a religion isn't my problem.
You also neglected to point out the context in which I made the remark you are quoting, was it accidental or was it deliberate to try to cast me in the worst possible light? I'm hoping for the former but suspecting the latter.
I wasn't the one that made comments insinuating that people whom are Christians/Jews/Muslims/etc. are of lesser intelligence than Atheists. Furthermore, I did not make any comment insulting Atheists implying that they lacked intelligence.
if atheism is a religion, who/what do we worship?
what are our values? what do we base them on?
is there a holy book?
do any atheists agree with you that atheism is a religion? do any dictionaries agree with you?
atheism is atheistic. a-theistic. A-THEISTIC. that basically means "not religious."
you are attempting to assert that "not being religious is a religion."
i'm not saying theists are less intelligent. i am saying that your assertion is self-contradicting and rather silly.
context, my foot!
i pointed out that you quoted "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" because you're casting so many stones. of course i was doing so to deliberately bathe you in the light you were trying to shine on someone else.
"atheism is a religion" is not a very intelligent position.
you might as well claim "evolution is a religion."
_________________
Waltur the Walrus Slayer,
Militant Asantist.
"BLASPHEMER!! !! !! !!" (according to AngelRho)
It is a good question as to what atheists worship, what do you consider to be your ultimate authority figure?
Really I could care less if atheists recognize themselves to be a religion or not, it basically is a religion due to the fact it is a belief there is no god. The lawsuits to force people to remove religious symbols and not allow religious displays because they offend atheists somehow. I really don't see how a nativity scene of a manger is offensive. Likewise I wouldn't consider a manora (however it is spelled) offensive.
But apparently atheists have a problem with people celebrating Christmas, as to why I have no idea.
There reaches a point where one overdoes seperation of church and state.
The law perhaps?
No. Atheism is the lack of belief in a god. Not the belief in the lack of a god.
Neither of these things are offensive, I'll give you that. Requiring prayer in schools on the other hand...
I don't know any atheists that have issues with other people celebrating Christmas. Heck - I'm an atheist, and I celebrate Christmas. I just don't celebrate Jesus's "Birthday."
Really? Separation of Church & State means the complete lack of Government involvement in religious affairs. That means that 0% of the country's budget should be used to endorse or suppress any religion.
By the way, I fixed your spelling.
The law perhaps?
Okay then what if a law is unjust.
No. Atheism is the lack of belief in a god. Not the belief in the lack of a god.
That is the same thing only you are moving words around, I will grant you some Aethists are open to the possibility of God actually existing. But it seems to be more of a belief that there is no God.
Neither of these things are offensive, I'll give you that. Requiring prayer in schools on the other hand...
And what about someone choosing on their own to pray and it happens to be at a school. Should a student get threatened or suspended for praying? Should a student get in trouble for wearing a cross on a necklace? These aren't hypotheticals, these have happened. Home Depot apparently fired someone for a "One nation under God," pin but let people wear gay pride buttons. Is that acceptable?
I don't know any atheists that have issues with other people celebrating Christmas. Heck - I'm an atheist, and I celebrate Christmas. I just don't celebrate Jesus's "Birthday."
That is you personally, there have been plenty of incidents covered in the news of incidents that I am referring to. (Usually the mainstream media doesn't care because it is persecution of Christians, so only conservative news sources will cover it).
Really? Separation of Church & State means the complete lack of Government involvement in religious affairs. That means that 0% of the country's budget should be used to endorse or suppress any religion.
By the way, I fixed your spelling.
Well unfortunately, that usually doesn't happen, see Oklahoma as an example. Oh and Nancy Pelosi tried to get the church to campaign for Obamacare which didn't go over very well.
The law perhaps?
Okay then what if a law is unjust.
No. Atheism is the lack of belief in a god. Not the belief in the lack of a god.
That is the same thing only you are moving words around, I will grant you some Aethists are open to the possibility of God actually existing. But it seems to be more of a belief that there is no God.
Neither of these things are offensive, I'll give you that. Requiring prayer in schools on the other hand...
And what about someone choosing on their own to pray and it happens to be at a school. Should a student get threatened or suspended for praying? Should a student get in trouble for wearing a cross on a necklace? These aren't hypotheticals, these have happened. Home Depot apparently fired someone for a "One nation under God," pin but let people wear gay pride buttons. Is that acceptable?
I don't know any atheists that have issues with other people celebrating Christmas. Heck - I'm an atheist, and I celebrate Christmas. I just don't celebrate Jesus's "Birthday."
That is you personally, there have been plenty of incidents covered in the news of incidents that I am referring to. (Usually the mainstream media doesn't care because it is persecution of Christians, so only conservative news sources will cover it).
Really? Separation of Church & State means the complete lack of Government involvement in religious affairs. That means that 0% of the country's budget should be used to endorse or suppress any religion.
By the way, I fixed your spelling.
Well unfortunately, that usually doesn't happen, see Oklahoma as an example. Oh and Nancy Pelosi tried to get the church to campaign for Obamacare which didn't go over very well.
The constitution forbids government support of religion because each religion objects to other religions and the government doesn't want to get involved in that can of worms. Would you like to be forced to hear prayers to Allah or to have to grow a beard such as the Taliban require? It's not atheists, but the fighting between religions that the government wants to avoid.
thats called being agnostic.
You can't just be "Agnostic." There are agnostic atheists, and agnostic theists.
Atheism simply means the lack of belief. Lack of belief is not the same as anti-belief.
For instance: All babies are atheists, because they have not yet been exposed to the concepts of religion.
To coin a phrase: "Atheism is a religion, like "bald" is a hair color."
I'm celebrating Atheistmas this year too.
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.
_________________
.
