What are Men for?
LKL wrote:
The people I see in the hospital, who are that obese, can generally barely walk and are universally nearly destitute. I think that if someone offered them a hundred bucks for a humiliating photo, most of them would have little choice but to take it.
Given that 'the internet' hasn't been available to the public at large for more than a decade or two, it's entirely possible that the photo was taken years ago and then scanned in; it's entirely possible that the women in question didn't even know what 'the internet' was at the time that the photo was taken.
Given that 'the internet' hasn't been available to the public at large for more than a decade or two, it's entirely possible that the photo was taken years ago and then scanned in; it's entirely possible that the women in question didn't even know what 'the internet' was at the time that the photo was taken.
I was thinking that it was a Photoshop project.
Greb wrote:
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care.
If you don't care about either of the words proper usage or definition then please stop using them as a central part of your discourse, thanks
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care.
If you don't care about either of the words proper usage or definition then please stop using them as a central part of your discourse, thanks
Typical liberal censorship...
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
Tequila wrote:
LKL wrote:
Raptor, what does posting an image of grossly obese women do for your argument, your ego, or your funny bone?
You never know, it might made a certain appendage tumescent...
There are loads of guys out there that like SSBBWs...
If Raptor wants to stay out of trouble, then he had better say "Yessss!! !", and make it convincing.
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care.
If you don't care about either of the words proper usage or definition then please stop using them as a central part of your discourse, thanks
Typical liberal censorship...
Typical evasive Greb behaviour
Fixed
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
ArrantPariah wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
I was sooooo worried us gals couldn't keep up, Arrant, thank you for that! I no longer have to worry.
I'm thinking that the absolutely delightful shape of the female bottom could actually help to make your farts more resonant and sonorous than ours.
Thanks!
Men still have one up on burps. Some guys can burp for ten minutes straight. It's like the opening to Dante's Inferno.
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care.
If you don't care about either of the words proper usage or definition then please stop using them as a central part of your discourse, thanks
Typical liberal censorship...
Typical evasive Greb behaviour
Fixed
Evasiv.... ehem...
The Avoiceformen website has been accused. I have aske like a dozen of times for some argument to support this accusation. Any argument. Any reasoning. I keep asking for it... and I'm still waiting. I'm not evading: this is the subject. It's me who keeps bringing it again and again. And of course, as good liberals, the libel has been done and then the bird flyes. Because liberals don't waste time with arguments. They speak the truth, they're far over those kind of dirty things as debating with arguments. They don't want their hands dirty with debating, they're here to 'guide' the rest of the world, not to debate
Nothing new.
So, some argument that supports the accusation or just more typical liberal diffame-and-run-away?
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
ArrantPariah wrote:
Tequila wrote:
LKL wrote:
Raptor, what does posting an image of grossly obese women do for your argument, your ego, or your funny bone?
You never know, it might made a certain appendage tumescent...
There are loads of guys out there that like SSBBWs...
If Raptor wants to stay out of trouble, then he had better say "Yessss!! !", and make it convincing.
Why would Raptor care about staying out of trouble?
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
LKL wrote:
The people I see in the hospital, who are that obese, can generally barely walk and are universally nearly destitute. I think that if someone offered them a hundred bucks for a humiliating photo, most of them would have little choice but to take it.
You'd have to pay me more than $100 just to risk breaking my camera to take a picture of those two.
Quote:
Given that 'the internet' hasn't been available to the public at large for more than a decade or two, it's entirely possible that the photo was taken years ago and then scanned in; it's entirely possible that the women in question didn't even know what 'the internet' was at the time that the photo was taken.
Aint likely, and even so I don't care.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Last edited by Raptor on 11 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care.
If you don't care about either of the words proper usage or definition then please stop using them as a central part of your discourse, thanks
Typical liberal censorship...
Typical evasive Greb behaviour
Fixed
Evasiv.... ehem...
The Avoiceformen website has been accused. I have aske like a dozen of times for some argument to support this accusation. Any argument. Any reasoning. I keep asking for it... and I'm still waiting. I'm not evading: this is the subject. It's me who keeps bringing it again and again. And of course, as good liberals, the libel has been done and then the bird flyes. Because liberals don't waste time with arguments. They speak the truth, they're far over those kind of dirty things as debating with arguments. They don't want their hands dirty with debating, they're here to 'guide' the rest of the world, not to debate
Nothing new.
So, some argument that supports the accusation or just more typical liberal diffame-and-run-away?
LOL this is great, you don't even understand what "apologist", "censorship" and "self-evident" mean, then you go off on some anti-liberal strawman diatribe (I'm pretty much a centrist, so you can take your vague assumptions about my politics and stick them where your opinions come from) about how you are better at arguing than those evil liberals. Lets make something clear: blatantly ignoring content for the sake of your initial premise and screeching "bald assertion" to anything that you disagree with is not an intellectual debate. You provided that web page as a link to back up your assertions, the impetus is on you to defend your source.
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Greb wrote:
LKL wrote:
No.
He stated that it was a rape apologist site. Two different things. Which is what we have been trying to explain to you.
APOLOGY =/= APOLOGIST.
Do you get it now?
Maybe, once you get your definitions straight, we can move on to whether the linked webpage is actually rape apologetics, because no one ever said that it was a rape apology. OK?
He stated that it was a rape apologist site. Two different things. Which is what we have been trying to explain to you.
APOLOGY =/= APOLOGIST.
Do you get it now?
Maybe, once you get your definitions straight, we can move on to whether the linked webpage is actually rape apologetics, because no one ever said that it was a rape apology. OK?
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care. It keeps being a serious accusation. You state, you prove. He states and you get into the debate, then you prove or don't come to waste my time.
What I'm asking is arguments. If you're getting around the differences between apologetics, apology, apologist, rapist, rape or whatever you want, you're wasting my time. Any of them is difamatory. Any of them is a libel. If you, or he, state a serious accustation.
Accusing of rape apologetics WITHOUT supporting it with arguments is a libel.
So, to make it clear: you're a libeller.
Ok, we're clear: you don't understand basic English enough to have even a basic internet discussion, and you're too arrogant to bother to learn even when you're shown your error. K. Good to know.
You can't make arguments, dude, when you don't even understand the words being used.
And as for 'serious accusations,' I suggest that you look around the internet a little bit (here's a hint: lots of people say lots of things).
How old are you, really? Because I feel a little bit like I'm trying to have a discussion with a pubescent, sexually frustrated 14 year old whenever you're around.
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Website or webpage, I don't care. Being apologist or doing apology, I don't care.
If you don't care about either of the words proper usage or definition then please stop using them as a central part of your discourse, thanks
Typical liberal censorship...
Typical evasive Greb behaviour
Fixed
Evasiv.... ehem...
The Avoiceformen website has been accused. I have aske like a dozen of times for some argument to support this accusation. Any argument. Any reasoning. I keep asking for it... and I'm still waiting. I'm not evading: this is the subject. It's me who keeps bringing it again and again. And of course, as good liberals, the libel has been done and then the bird flyes. Because liberals don't waste time with arguments. They speak the truth, they're far over those kind of dirty things as debating with arguments. They don't want their hands dirty with debating, they're here to 'guide' the rest of the world, not to debate
Nothing new.
So, some argument that supports the accusation or just more typical liberal diffame-and-run-away?
LOL this is great, you don't even understand what "apologist", "censorship" and "self-evident" mean, then you go off on some anti-liberal strawman diatribe (I'm pretty much a centrist, so you can take your vague assumptions about my politics and stick them where your opinions come from) about how you are better at arguing than those evil liberals. Lets make something clear: blatantly ignoring content for the sake of your initial premise and screeching "bald assertion" to anything that you disagree with is not an intellectual debate. You provided that web page as a link to back up your assertions, the impetus is on you to defend your source.
OK. Still waiting (two days later) for some kind of argument. Instead of it, more insults and personal attacks. How typically liberal...
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
Last edited by Greb on 11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

