Page 16 of 38 [ 601 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 38  Next

babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 8:57 am

Twilightprincess wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Actually, women who don't want to be called "women" because of the "men" ending prefer to be called "womyn."


SOME do. I don’t care for “womyn.” I prefer using gender neutral terms wherever possible.

I think that gender is too inflated of a concept. We are all people first.


I'd rather like to think of myself as an individual as well but that doesn't stand for much when you go for a job interview or when you're even just out in public.

I mean unless we (both women and men) look exactly the same outwardly then we are never going to be treated the same.

I'd actually hate to think of a genderless future. It would bring about the end of so many things. Including debates like this.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 9:08 am

Dox47 wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
This is called the false dilemma fallacy. I don’t have to pick a word in order to object to your stance.


I assure you, picking a word will be less trouble than trying to rhetorically fight me on it, but you still won't because you get so much mileage out of the fuzzy definition, criticism being so easily deflected with more word games instead of substantive engagement. So, woke it is.


IMHO I think that even if we did pick a particular word it wouldn't make a scap of difference to most people. People would still treat you the same because you're outward appearance is still the same.

If I called myself a menstruator or a birth giver and I go to the pub dressed up as a slut then that is what people would treat me as. If I called myself those things and dressed as a Conservative person in twinset and beads then that is what I would be treated as, regardless of my political position.

If I went to the pub with a group of people of both genders and we all had our heads shaved and wore overalls and our outward appearance was exactly the same (genderless) then we would all be treated the same...with suspension.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 9:48 am

quaker wrote:
I love that line from the old 30's jazz song:

"It ain't what you do but the way that you do it... that's what gets results."

When we feel so passionately about our convictions, I think it is wise to deeply reflect on the means we use to achieve our ends. It seems to me that not doing so is only accentuating the polarisation and fragmentation of the world we live in.

The older I get, the more I seem to fall into the
"don't know" camp on many hot issues .. it's honest and I prefer hanging out with fellow "don't knowers" that with those that shake their fists at me and the world.


I'm a "don't knower" as well.

The best day of my life was when I was about 25 and I woke up one morning and realised that I actually know nothing. It was like an epiphany.

Maybe that is the meaning of "woke".


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 9:55 am

funeralxempire wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I wouldn’t want to be called “a person with a penis.”



Howbout...."a penis, with a person attached". :D ?

:lol:


This ol' pecker-bearer has a point. :nerdy:


That was a welcome break. Cheers folks with phallus's


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:01 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I, myself, wouldn't want to see a woman in a bathroom where I'm "doing my business."

And I am SURE women don't like seeing men in their "inner sanctum."

Women's bathrooms used to be (maybe still are) places where they (women) consult each other about something like "how the date is going" when there's a double date.


Oh womens bathrooms are a whole other dimension wolfie. You should treat yourself to a new adventure at some point.

Seriously though. I don't have a problem with men using the women's and vice versa.

I was in a pub last night and a woman and man went into the women's toilets together. It really would have gone unnoticed except for the fuss and debate they had about it before entering. Its not that much of a big deal.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:02 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
There's nothing "sneaky," or "sniveling, or "centrist" about my pointing out the potential for abuse.

There is an element of male who likes looking at women go to the bathroom. That's a fact. I'm not one of them. But I've known people who do like this.


We have individual cubicles. He would have to literally lie down on the floor to cop an eyeful


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:06 am

funeralxempire wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
On a double-date, a woman used to say to another woman, "let's go powder our nose." That meant they would consult each other on the date in the bathroom.

I've actually experienced this.


I've always assumed 'powdering one's nose' meant coming back with a numb nose and sniffles, maybe some bitter tasting drips.

Cant tell if you're joking or serious. But no. It predates the Seventies cocaine craze. What Krafty said. Respectable ladies in old movies, and in even in childrens' cartoons, would leave the room with the excuse to 'powder their noses'- either because they really needed to apply cosmetic powder to their noses, or that was an excuse for something like defecating. Using coke would be LESS respectable even than defecating, and not more so. So you can tell from the context that it means something 'respectable'.


But as with Krafty I had no idea (when I heard the expression IRL or on TV) as a kid, nor now, why a shiny nose is bad. Lol!


I understood it as both a very archaic tradition and somewhat less archaic euphemism, but I tend to assume if it's being used now it's more likely distorted from the earlier euphemism (even if they're using it to mean going to the bathroom, they're probably aware of it having multiple euphemistic meanings so they'll use it in situations where the ambiguity is multiplied for lulz, vs. the euphemism they'd pick in another situation).


I used to powder my nose quite a lot in the 1990s.

Also I stayed in a hotel only last year and the women's toilets were actually called powder rooms. I thought it was quite a charming touch.


_________________
we have existence


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,610

27 Aug 2022, 10:12 am

babybird wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
There's nothing "sneaky," or "sniveling, or "centrist" about my pointing out the potential for abuse.

There is an element of male who likes looking at women go to the bathroom. That's a fact. I'm not one of them. But I've known people who do like this.


We have individual cubicles. He would have to literally lie down on the floor to cop an eyeful


Also, if a guy is going to engage in that sort of behavior, the bathroom isn’t really the problem. He’d just find other ways to be a pervert.

I really don’t think that unisex bathrooms would increase these sorts of problems. I haven’t heard of them doing so in countries that have them.

I prefer using private bathrooms wherever possible, though.


_________________
“The darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.”
— from Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:15 am

IsabellaLinton wrote:
Those sprays make me sick for days because of the chemical fragrance.

I'd rather deal with a doozie than a spray.

Sorry babybird, we are way off topic here. Hope that's OK. :)


It's fine.

Just thinking back to when I was a cleaner. Yes both can smell as bad as each other and some people actually need raking out.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:18 am

funeralxempire wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I guess it's a "societal" thing-----but I like to try to put my "best foot forward" in front of a woman.


I always figured one is putting zero feet forward with the folks one meets in public bathrooms

Unless that's one's thing...


I think you need to watch where you put your feet in most public bathrooms. Especially if you're fond of wearing flip flops.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:27 am

Dox47 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Personally, I have to admit ... I thought the world had moved on past the whole bathroom issue, and did roll my eyes a little that it managed to come up again.

Also have to admit, I'd never heard the term "cotton ceiling," and looked that one up. Hm, I have opinions, but not really interested in expanding the things debated in this thread.


Trans issues are the real black hole of a debate, it's just a toxic scene, and you truly would probably have a hard time believing some of the stuff you'll hear if you dig into it. I feel bad because I honestly think it's a situation where a community is being poorly served by the "activists" claiming to represent them, I suspect the vast majority of trans people would prefer to quietly live as their chosen gender without all the fuss, but this *extremely* loud minority manages to command all the attention and drives the issue. As with woke stuff generally, far too many people use these issues as basically a license to be a jerk, indulging in all of their bullying instincts with the patina of moral righteousness making it "okay" for them to do, good even, all the while fomenting a backlash against the very people they claim to be helping.


Agreed. I do think that there are certain people who like to use woke as a weapon and a useful tool in bullying.

I've also known people who I figured to be racist to befriend people of colour (in the workplace) just so they could get better positions and promotion.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:32 am

Dox47 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
For what it's worth, those all seem like more valid concerns than where people deposit their waste.


Care to wager if he has to Google what at least one of those things is?

I really don't care for the most part about trans stuff, I think it's largely blown out of proportion, but I can't stand sacred cows that you aren't supposed to question, especially when the bovine in question has quite so many defense mechanisms, from TERF accusations (seriously, it's just a slur at this point, it has no actual meaning) to "believe the science" (that is often shoddy and has no real track record), to emotional blackmail (they'll kill themselves if you don't use the right terminology), it all raises giant red flags to me.

The women's prisons thing is probably the most serious, there have been multiple instances of unaltered males claiming transgender identity being housed with natal female inmates and going on to rape them, I think the only reason it hasn't been a bigger scandal has been media aversion to the stories. It kind of reminds me of the grooming gangs incidents in the UK, where the police slow walked or outright ignored multiple cases of organized sexual exploitation of minors because the perpetrators were all Pakistanis (IIRC), and they were afraid of looking racist. Can you even imagine the outrage if those stories were more widely known?

Transbians and their issues are mostly just sad, but the entitlement displayed by the whole cotton ceiling thing is pretty gross, truly toxic behavior excused because of the identity of the perpetrators.


Do trans people gat the choice of whether to be imprisoned in a male or female establishment?

I worry that a female to male trans person who hasn't had the full surgery gets no choice but to be put in with men. I mean they obviously identify as a man but to certain other men they might still be female.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:36 am

Dox47 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
But further, part of the problem is that it's impossible to tell good faith and bad faith actors unless one knows the individual well-enough to make that judgment. The bad faith ones use the good faith ones for cover, so if there's concern about being judged, dealing with the people who are using them for cover will do more than complaining the criticism is unfair.


I think you've got your tactics wrong there, if you treat someone acting in bad faith as if they're being genuine, you've wasted a bit of your time, but if you treat someone acting in good faith as if they're being disingenuous, you're at minimum going to piss them off, and potentially make an enemy both for yourself and your cause. Ever notice just how many people that hate wokeness have similar stories about being unfairly accused of things? It's not a coincidence.


I literally feared for my safety once after being called a racist in one workplace. I don't think I dealt with the accusation very well to be honest but it came as a shock to me and I reacted impulsively.


_________________
we have existence


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

27 Aug 2022, 10:37 am

babybird wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Personally, I have to admit ... I thought the world had moved on past the whole bathroom issue, and did roll my eyes a little that it managed to come up again.

Also have to admit, I'd never heard the term "cotton ceiling," and looked that one up. Hm, I have opinions, but not really interested in expanding the things debated in this thread.


Trans issues are the real black hole of a debate, it's just a toxic scene, and you truly would probably have a hard time believing some of the stuff you'll hear if you dig into it. I feel bad because I honestly think it's a situation where a community is being poorly served by the "activists" claiming to represent them, I suspect the vast majority of trans people would prefer to quietly live as their chosen gender without all the fuss, but this *extremely* loud minority manages to command all the attention and drives the issue. As with woke stuff generally, far too many people use these issues as basically a license to be a jerk, indulging in all of their bullying instincts with the patina of moral righteousness making it "okay" for them to do, good even, all the while fomenting a backlash against the very people they claim to be helping.


Agreed. I do think that there are certain people who like to use woke as a weapon and a useful tool in bullying.

I've also known people who I figured to be racist to befriend people of colour (in the workplace) just so they could get better positions and promotion.



I have seen woke being used as a weaponized word as a way to dismiss an opinion or a issue soneone points out we have in our country. It's like how I have seen people on the spectrum use the term NT the same way. As if being NT is a bad thing but it's a way to say they are not a real aspie. It's an attack.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 10:53 am

The_Walrus wrote:
Dox47 wrote:

The women's prisons thing is probably the most serious, there have been multiple instances of unaltered males claiming transgender identity being housed with natal female inmates and going on to rape them, I think the only reason it hasn't been a bigger scandal has been media aversion to the stories.

I do think that I (as a user) cannot let this stand unchallenged. It’s a great example of a moral panic.

It is rare and difficult for a trans person who has not legally changed their gender to be housed in prisons intended for the opposite sex. The vast majority of trans women are imprisoned in the male estate, often in solitary confinement because they’re deemed to be at risk from the men. Additionally, in the UK every single trans man in prison is imprisoned in the female estate.

Yes, sometimes trans women commit sexual assault in prison. But so do cis women (and cis men). The particular panic around trans women assaulting cis women is out of proportion. The vast majority of sexual assaults committed in women’s prisons are committed by cis women. There is no clarity on the proportion of assaults committed by trans women rather than trans men or non-binary prisoners, but in the UK, a sexual assault is committed by a trans prisoner about once every two years. Meanwhile, a trans woman in the male estate is sexually assaulted once a month. Trans women are much more likely to be the victims of prison violence than the perpetrators.

Source for the above: https://chamberuk.com/opinion-transgend ... ally-know/

(And it seems to also hold true in a US context: https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/fi ... %20web.pdf)

I also can’t agree with the idea that sexual assaults committed by trans people aren’t widely reported upon. I already knew most of what I was saying, but needed to find sources. When I searched the internet, did I immediately find what I was looking for? No, I found no end of hysteria, from tabloids, TERF groups, and even politicians. I also found plenty of reporting of specific instances, particularly Karen White. To be clear, I think it is legitimate to cover the Karen White case, but White was given far more attention than cis women who do the same thing, or cis men who assault men, or trans victims, even though all of those happen far more often.


Thank you. You answered my above query.


_________________
we have existence


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

27 Aug 2022, 11:21 am

I've learned loads and you've given me loads of food for thought.

My conclusion in my own mind is that for my personal life "woke" will be replaced by something more positive like "progressiveness" as I still believe that "woke" brings with it all manner of connotations and could be a source of contention.

I do however have a new found understanding of where the word originates and as such it should have its place but just not in my own personal world.

I have also learned that one person's definition and understanding of it can significantly differ from another person's understanding.

I feel like I've been on a bit of a tour with this thread.

I wish you all the very best. Thank you for your help.


_________________
we have existence