Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
I still want to hear whether or not you are willing to donate a kidney, which you don't really need, to save the life of some other deserving person.
Again another strawman argument, cause a child in the womb is only in the womb for a matter of months, it isn't a permanent situation like removing organs.
bullshit- its an
extra kidney. Almost no one dies from having a kidney removed - nearly every living donor, just like nearly every pregnant woman, goes on to live a full and normal life after the procedure. It's an organ that
you don't need and
someone else will die without.
Quote:
How can you say that someone is not a human being one minute but a few weeks later they are.
As you yourself have noted, the CNS of a fetus develops pretty rapidly. The data show that, by the middle of the 3rd trimester, a fetus has significantly more neural function than a 2nd trimester fetus.
Quote:
So if they someday say that children under age 12 are nothing more than property, I guess you would be okay with that too.
Talk about strawmen...
Quote:
If what you call a "fetus" which is in reality a child...
No. Medically, a fetus is not a child and a child is not a fetus. Neither one is an embryo, and not a child nor a fetus nor an embryo is a zygote. The terms are specific and mutually exclusive. You are simply
incorrect on this.
Quote:
...or for that matter what makes you anything more than property, because you happen to be autistic so you aren't "really human."
I miss out on far more because of my gender than because of my autism.
Quote:
However, why should we condone the murder of an innocent child, simply cause it may make the rape victim feel better. Two wrongs do not make a right!
It's not murder.
It's not innocent.
It's not a child.
and, finally, 'making the rape victim feel better' is not "simple" in either the sense of being trivial or the sense of being not difficult.