17 Dec 2012, 8:27 am
17 Dec 2012, 9:53 am
17 Dec 2012, 10:12 am
17 Dec 2012, 12:27 pm
17 Dec 2012, 12:29 pm
17 Dec 2012, 12:43 pm
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Quote:
All things considered one thing seems obvious. Adam Lanza's mother Nancy bought high powered guns to protect herself in the zombie apocalypse, if the reports in the media are accurate. Ironically, these guns were used to kill her. This needs to be taken into consideration. Did they really end up protecting her? The gun advocates will say guns are the only thing that will ever protect. Well? Why did they fail to protect Nancy Lanza? Sometimes the perceived solution is not always the answer. Not calling for a ban on the second amendment, just saying people should think about stuff a bit more.
Forget his mother, already! She’s not the one that pulled the trigger and she can have as many guns as she wanted. Nutty as it is, there’s nothing illegal about arming against zombies.
vermontsavant wrote:
Quote:
my thoughts exactly.
im in favor of doing something that sacrifice some of my gun freedoms now if it stops the violence.i am afraid that if the violence continues we may face a total gun ban.the outdoors is a big part of my life i wouldnt want to loose hunting.
im in favor of doing something that sacrifice some of my gun freedoms now if it stops the violence.i am afraid that if the violence continues we may face a total gun ban.the outdoors is a big part of my life i wouldnt want to loose hunting.
Why am I not surprised that you would take this stand….
So what previous sacrifices on gun freedoms have produced a measurable result in violent crime prevention/reduction? NFA-34, GCA-68, the 1994 AWB, New York’s Sullivan law, etc, etc?
Total gun ban? Not in this century and not in this country. That WOULD trigger an armed revolt.
Why don’t you just pick a side, pro or anti, and stay put? This was we’ll all at least know for sure what your position is.
17 Dec 2012, 1:04 pm
17 Dec 2012, 1:11 pm
Raptor wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Forget his mother, already! She’s not the one that pulled the trigger and she can have as many guns as she wanted. Nutty as it is, there’s nothing illegal about arming against zombies.
vermontsavant wrote:
Why am I not surprised that you would take this stand….
So what previous sacrifices on gun freedoms have produced a measurable result in violent crime prevention/reduction? NFA-34, GCA-68, the 1994 AWB, New York’s Sullivan law, etc, etc?
Total gun ban? Not in this century and not in this country. That WOULD trigger an armed revolt.
Why don’t you just pick a side, pro or anti, and stay put? This was we’ll all at least know for sure what your position is.
i have said that i not for goverment intervention on laws,yes i would admitt that im on the carefull side when it comes to gun safety in my personal life.
Quote:
All things considered one thing seems obvious. Adam Lanza's mother Nancy bought high powered guns to protect herself in the zombie apocalypse, if the reports in the media are accurate. Ironically, these guns were used to kill her. This needs to be taken into consideration. Did they really end up protecting her? The gun advocates will say guns are the only thing that will ever protect. Well? Why did they fail to protect Nancy Lanza? Sometimes the perceived solution is not always the answer. Not calling for a ban on the second amendment, just saying people should think about stuff a bit more.
Forget his mother, already! She’s not the one that pulled the trigger and she can have as many guns as she wanted. Nutty as it is, there’s nothing illegal about arming against zombies.
vermontsavant wrote:
Quote:
my thoughts exactly.
im in favor of doing something that sacrifice some of my gun freedoms now if it stops the violence.i am afraid that if the violence continues we may face a total gun ban.the outdoors is a big part of my life i wouldnt want to loose hunting.
im in favor of doing something that sacrifice some of my gun freedoms now if it stops the violence.i am afraid that if the violence continues we may face a total gun ban.the outdoors is a big part of my life i wouldnt want to loose hunting.
Why am I not surprised that you would take this stand….
So what previous sacrifices on gun freedoms have produced a measurable result in violent crime prevention/reduction? NFA-34, GCA-68, the 1994 AWB, New York’s Sullivan law, etc, etc?
Total gun ban? Not in this century and not in this country. That WOULD trigger an armed revolt.
Why don’t you just pick a side, pro or anti, and stay put? This was we’ll all at least know for sure what your position is.
i think those are valid stands on the issues.
one of the reasons i dont support more gun control is the slippery slope of: If they first ban only non hunting guns then the next step would be banning hunting guns,things like that are never a line in the sand but a slippery slope,,
yes i do believe my veiws have been consistent on this deabate
17 Dec 2012, 1:17 pm
17 Dec 2012, 1:25 pm
17 Dec 2012, 1:35 pm
17 Dec 2012, 1:49 pm
17 Dec 2012, 2:01 pm
17 Dec 2012, 2:05 pm
17 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
17 Dec 2012, 2:37 pm
Raptor wrote:
You must not have read my item 2 where I advocated shooting them.
That takes a gun.
That takes a gun.
Ah, you see, I assumed you meant police using rubber bullets/ non lethal rounds as they are paid by taxes to do.
My mistake.
Surfman, that photo is disturbing
. If I had a child that went to that school, I'd be pulling them straight out of there immediately.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Florida State University Mass Shooting |
19 Apr 2025, 5:25 am |
| Best selling author in shooting incident with cops |
10 Apr 2025, 5:02 pm |
| North Carolina House Party Mass Shooting |
02 Jun 2025, 12:07 am |
| South Carolina beach town mass shooting |
26 May 2025, 6:57 pm |
