ArrantPariah wrote:
LKL wrote:
NobodyKnows wrote:
LKL wrote:
Quote:
2- I keep being flat-out right.
Only in your own mind, honey.
Exactly. When I use a word like that on these forums, I mean it as an insult.
I thought that you were flirting.
Well, I'll take as a flirt, even if you dish it out as an insult.
Definitely
not flirting in my case. It's basically an alternative to calling someone an uneducated child, if you do it to someone
not a close friend or in your immediate family. It's like if a Japanese man were to refer to a colleague, with whom he has no relationship outside of the office, as 'Hirata-kun' instead of 'Hirata-san.' Or, even worse, as 'Hirata-chan,' something reserved for small children and (sometimes) young women. There's nothing wrong with the suffixes -kun and -chan in and of themselves; Mr. Hirata and his siblings and parents might refer to each other with -chan, for example, and his close friends probably refer to him with -kun. For a colleague to do it would be a dire insult, though.
Edit: It really grates on my when someone uses these terms on me, but I'll make allowances if someone is old enough to be my grandparent.
At the hospital I refer to patients as 'sir' or 'ma'am,' and it really bothers me when some nurses/caretakers call patients 'honey' or 'sweetie.' It really bothers a lot of patients, too; I have been able to work with patients that other staff said were "difficult" simply by addressing them with a little human respect.