SkinnedWolf wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
We're not an intelligent enough animal to avoid causing our own extinction.
Maybe individually, but not collectively. As a species we're more addicted to the things that are dooming us than the worst meth or heroin junkie imaginable.
This may not be due to not being intelligent enough.
It is difficult for us to achieve long-term planning in the presence of internal conflicts of interest.
I guess I'm attributing the inability to resolve such issues to a lack of intelligence. If the zombie apocalypse was upon us we might be able to address it, but the nature of the problems we face makes it impossible to deal with it in a meaningful way.
I get it because I also struggle with anything involving long-term planning but I tend to put that in the category
of things that make me less intelligent than I might be able to appear in some contexts.
I think I'm mostly thinking about things like "epidemic diseases", "climate change", "chemical pollution". There are clear short-term benefits of not considering these issues. Paying attention to these issues in advance brings negative returns.
Humanity has no shortage of think tanks to come up with viable solutions. But as a species divided on interests, our chances of implementing these programs are slim.
I tend to think of
can it be implemented without conflicts of interest sabotaging attempts as part of viable. I agree with where you're coming from but I think I lump some of the chunks together differently.
If we can't resolve those conflicts or interest or if a plan doesn't include change the structures that cause those conflicts I'm not sure it's viable in the sense of likely to be adopted and put into practice, even if it works on a theoretical level.
But some of my argument might be semantics.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.