12 Aug 2013, 1:00 pm
12 Aug 2013, 1:06 pm
12 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
12 Aug 2013, 2:10 pm
12 Aug 2013, 2:18 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
LOL this is great, you don't even understand what "apologist", "censorship" and "self-evident" mean, then you go off on some anti-liberal strawman diatribe (I'm pretty much a centrist, so you can take your vague assumptions about my politics and stick them where your opinions come from) about how you are better at arguing than those evil liberals. Lets make something clear: blatantly ignoring content for the sake of your initial premise and screeching "bald assertion" to anything that you disagree with is not an intellectual debate. You provided that web page as a link to back up your assertions, the impetus is on you to defend your source.
OK. Still waiting (two days later) for some kind of argument. Instead of it, more insults and personal attacks. How typically liberal...
I will "liberally" keep calling you on your BS. But please, keep weaseling, it makes for a good show. Exactly what I expect from angst-ridden teenage "MRAs" (I think LKL is onto something there). Whining about insults, as well, is entirely hypocritical of you, since you make "liberal" use of indirect personal attacks in most of your posts where you aren't obfuscating, Anyway, enjoy advocating on behalf of a web page claiming its bigoted, stereotypical or outright disingenuous content is somehow representative of the entire male population- I mean, "a voice for men"? Not my voice. Nobody speaks for me, especially not a bunch of candyass neocon adult virgins who can't accept responsibility for their own failures and sexual inadequacies and feel resentment when they see women taking positions in society "meant for them".
I think though, you aught to go over how me telling you not to use the term "apologist" if you aren't even willing to understand the definition of it is "liberal censorship". This one I am definitely excited to hear about. Is grammar a liberal conspiracy against you poor Freedumb fighters?
And more insults...
Excuse me, I asked you a question, boy. Please explain how telling you to stop misusing a word you don't- and won't- understand is "liberal censorship", I really want to hear about this in depth
And keeps avoiding to provide some kind of arguments to support the accusation...
keep telling yourself that (while avoiding defending your source), but I want to know about your censorship comment. Or are you embarrassed?And more personal attacks...
12 Aug 2013, 2:24 pm
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
keep telling yourself that (while avoiding defending your source), but I want to know about your censorship comment. Or are you embarrassed?And more personal attacks...
Asking you if you are embarrassed is a personal attack? Right. Well now I can say with some certainty that Greb:
-Has no idea what "apologist" means, let alone the difference between "apologist" and "an apology";
-Has no idea what "censorship" means;
-Has no idea what "personal attacks" are.
I salute you!
Keep fighting the good fight you hero, you.
12 Aug 2013, 2:38 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
keep telling yourself that (while avoiding defending your source), but I want to know about your censorship comment. Or are you embarrassed?And more personal attacks...
Asking you if you are embarrassed is a personal attack? Right. Well now I can say with some certainty that Greb:
-Has no idea what "apologist" means, let alone the difference between "apologist" and "an apology";
-Has no idea what "censorship" means;
-Has no idea what "personal attacks" are.
I salute you!
Keep fighting the good fight you hero, you.More insults...
12 Aug 2013, 2:39 pm
ArrantPariah wrote:
Oh, It's on!
12 Aug 2013, 2:54 pm
12 Aug 2013, 2:58 pm
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
keep telling yourself that (while avoiding defending your source), but I want to know about your censorship comment. Or are you embarrassed?And more personal attacks...
Asking you if you are embarrassed is a personal attack? Right. Well now I can say with some certainty that Greb:
-Has no idea what "apologist" means, let alone the difference between "apologist" and "an apology";
-Has no idea what "censorship" means;
-Has no idea what "personal attacks" are.
I salute you!
Keep fighting the good fight you hero, you.More insults...
Calling everything an "insult" or a "personal attack" does not make it so wee lad. Besides, you literally said yourself you don't know or care about the definition of apologist. You then accused me of "liberal censorship" for telling you to please not use the term if you won't even make an effort to understand it. So other than repeating your statements, asking for clarification and coming to a reasonable conclusion based on your lack of answers; I am not actually doing anything bub
12 Aug 2013, 3:03 pm
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Is it true that women like a man in uniform because they know he'll follow orders?
Women like them because they are serving their country but being in uniform, for a guy, often means
small paycheck
always away from home
high risk of PTSD
unless he's an officer.
Don't forget
-Crapping against a tree in the woods for weeks on end, possibly without any tp and definitely without a shower;
-Putting up with make-work from the NCO's;
-Miscellaneous hazing rituals
12 Aug 2013, 3:10 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Greb wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
keep telling yourself that (while avoiding defending your source), but I want to know about your censorship comment. Or are you embarrassed?And more personal attacks...
Asking you if you are embarrassed is a personal attack? Right. Well now I can say with some certainty that Greb:
-Has no idea what "apologist" means, let alone the difference between "apologist" and "an apology";
-Has no idea what "censorship" means;
-Has no idea what "personal attacks" are.
I salute you!
Keep fighting the good fight you hero, you.More insults...
Calling everything an "insult" or a "personal attack" does not make it so wee lad. Besides, you literally said yourself you don't know or care about the definition of apologist. You then accused me of "liberal censorship" for telling you to please not use the term if you won't even make an effort to understand it. So other than repeating your statements, asking for clarification and coming to a reasonable conclusion based on your lack of answers; I am not actually doing anything bub
Accusing a website, avoiceformen.com, either of rape apology, of being rape apologists or of rape apologetics is in all cases an serious accusation that needs to be supported with arguments. I don't care which was the accusation, because no matter which one of them it was, you have to support it. Something that three days later I haven't seen yet. Instead of it, what I have seen is more and more insults and personal attacks.
And I'm still waiting for some arguments that supports the accusation. Three days later. And everytime I ask for those arguments, I get personal insults instead.
This is the way liberals debate. Insulting people.
12 Aug 2013, 3:36 pm
Raptor wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Oh, It's on!
This is another thing that we're obviously good for: pissing contests.
12 Aug 2013, 3:54 pm
12 Aug 2013, 3:55 pm
12 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
ArrantPariah wrote:
This is another thing that we're obviously good for: pissing contests.
There hasn't been a good pissing contest in months.
