Scalia Death Conflicting Reports Coming In

Post Reply New Topic

Did Leonard Nimoy Have Antonin Scalia Killed to Give Obama Enough Supreme Court Votes to Cancel the 2016 Election?

... The Republican Party is waiting until Hillary Clinton is nominated to turn over to the FBI reams of documents that implicate the former secretary of state so profoundly that the Department of Justice will have little choice but to indict her. That's when President Obama will be forced to step in and cancel the presidential election to save the Democrats. Without Scalia, the U.S. Supreme Court will be helpless to stop it.

But ... Isn't Leonard Nimoy dead? That's what "Spock" wants you to believe ... he's actually been consolidating Illuminati power since faking his own death. And Nimoy, referred to as the "Pinnacle of the Draco," is the "wild card" in a plot to assassinate Scalia...

Source: This NPR Article.

i dont believe leonard nemoy is alive nor was scalia killed to cancel the 2016 elections.the family rushed law enforcement because they wanted to body quikly.

i also dont see obama would even have power to cancel the elections with or without scalia.i could be wrong

You're talking like you never reports him. You told me in a pm you reported him. And nothing he ever said is as bad as the things you post. You really need to grow up and stop acting so childish.

Not who knows when... FOREVER. The country is turning liberal, the young people are liberals, the court is going to reflect the country... while the Republican party disintegrates into irrelevance. Get used to it.

Not forever because nothing is forever. I do agree we are entering or are in a progressive era. I do expect the democratic nominee to win handily and the party to have huge gains and if not take over Congress. If people think there is too much "political correctness" now just wait 5 years. This era is a reaction to the excesses of the anti government/individualism era that stated with Reagan and ended sometime during the second Bush 43 term. That previous era was a reaction to the execesses of the New Deal era.

It would better without these intense wild swings but that is how American public opinions works.

Obama hired a Ninja and Scalia was took out with a dart from a blow gun.A mixture of Poison Dart frog and Aconite.

If you listen to Alex Jones you'd know it was a heart attack gun.

Silly though it might seem, the U.S. Senate "Church Committee" investigated the CIA on a host of reasons, not least of which was the "heart-attack gun." In the YouTube.com video titled "CIA secret weapon of assassination Heart Attack Gun, Declassified 1975 New World Order Report" shows U.S. Sens. Church, Goldwater and Tower handling the gun and asking questions of DCI Colby.

Not everything Alex Jones says is a lie. Sometimes he simply restates what our own "dear leaders" admit.

Last edited by AspieUtah on 17 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Yes Leonard is our great and powerful leader.All hail The Nimoy!! !

I was thinking blow dart too. But it might have been Al Gore. He's very passionate about climate change.

About 98 percent of what he says is crap. He occasionally uses a real event to launch into his rants but by the time he's done the nugget of truth is buried by a avalanche of speculation, misquotes, out of context remarks and some outright lies.

I couldn't care less what Alex Jones says. The video evidence of a 1975 U.S. Senate investigation of the CIA so-called heart-attack gun proves that such a device existed (and certainly still exists).

There are times when it is good to do everything by the book.

President Obama did not swear his oath of office on a bible.

Is that important? He was the first. I do not understand why he did not do so. I am not suggesting something
sinster. But I do not think the reasons given make any sense.

I do not understand why you feel the ability to judge someone else evil.

I do not understand why anyone would suggest that another person is evil outside of evidence of things like violence.

I do not understand your point. Either way the Supreme Court ruled, the results would have been the same.
Many people would have liked to have all of the precincts of Florida do a recount.
That was not legally one of the possiblities that the Supreme Court had.
What set of circumscances could the Surpeme Court ruled in a manner that would have changed the election?
I have asked many people this for many years. Lawyers and Judges agree. The case that was before the Supreme
Court was totally one sided.
People who did not want George W. Bush to become president put a case in front of the Supreme Court.
This is true. But that particual case had 0 merit.
In many ways people have pointed out ways that the election was not done as it should have been. I have not and
do not suggest that those are incorrect.
But those ways were not material grounds for the Supreme Court case.
Many times between then and now people suggest to me that there was wrongdoing involved. I do not see any. I
have no idea what people think that the Supreme Court should have done. I would like someone to say what they
did wrong. Then I can ask other people, and if they do can not give reason why that is incorrect I would ask
others.
But no one actually gives facts. They just mention the fact that the case was before the Court.

Why can Scalia be personally judged to be evil? Let's see:

Stole the election for George W. (and all the terrible ramifications that followed).
Citizens United, which takes us one more step toward oligarchy and plutocracy.
His attempt to limit the rights of full citizenship to all citizens, by voting against marriage equality.

Sounds evil to me.

Why can Scalia be personally judged to be evil? Let's see:

Stole the election for George W. (and all the terrible ramifications that followed).
Citizens United, which takes us one more step toward oligarchy and plutocracy.
His attempt to limit the rights of full citizenship to all citizens, by voting against marriage equality.
Voting to slash part of the Voting Rights Act.

Sounds evil to me.