Page 18 of 34 [ 544 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 34  Next


Would you date a feminist?
Yes 37%  37%  [ 55 ]
No 36%  36%  [ 53 ]
Ima girl 2%  2%  [ 3 ]
Ima girl and still yes 19%  19%  [ 29 ]
I'm a feminist and I am offended by this thread 6%  6%  [ 9 ]
Total votes : 149

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Apr 2016, 2:08 am

cathylynn wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
cathylynn wrote:
sounds like you are defensive and somewhat unaware of your privilege.
Are you aware of his privilege? Do you know his life story? Do you know if he grew up rich or poor?

Which privilege are you referring too? Do you believe all men are privileged? Including rich men, poor men, garbage men, disabled men, congressmen, airmen, firemen, unemployed men, are all these men privileged over all women?

How do you know whether or not he's aware of his privileges? Can you read his mind? Can you infer it from his post? Even though it wasn't actually about whether or not he's privileged?

Are you aware of your privilege? If you weren't you'd never know because how can you know about something you're not aware of. Do you have the ultimate privilege of not being aware of your privilege? If you did you'd never know it.

So since he has that privilege bestowed universally on all men, does that mean what he has to say doesn't matter? Because regardless of if he's rich or poor he's privileged so his opinion doesn't count? Does his opinion matter so little that it doesn't even warrant a proper counter argument? Is it better to use an argument that doesn't actually address the thing it's arguing against at all.

I understand, thinking of an argument that actually has something to do with the thing you're arguing against is very hard work. It's an ingenious labour saving device you have there.

You can just dismiss all male arguments with "you're unaware of your privilege" and that way you don't even have to formulate a real counter argument. It's so easy. This is the best debating technique since the strawman argument :D

he made no arguments, so there's nothing to answer. and yes, all males have privilege, as do all white people in america. i am white and i haven't regularly been followed in department stores as a potential thief.


Women have their privilege too, for instance....your government won't send you to the army in case your country gets invaded.
Another instance, househusbandry is not respected while housewivery is praised (even though it gets attacked by some feminists), you as a woman, you have the choice to either be working or to be a stay-at-home mom; men don't have this luxury, if a man fails to get a job then he instantly become a pariah (including in the dating market) - even dogs would be viewed more valuable than them by their govs; hence why there are way more homeless men than women.



CommanderKeen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138

08 Apr 2016, 2:46 am

cathylynn wrote:
i read ali's book "infidel" and think the world of her work to improve the plight of muslim women.

Women are oppressed in MUSLIM societies. Women are freer than they've ever been in the western world. You better not tell the liberals that Islam oppresses women though. It's much more important that they focus on female butts being shown in video games than the literal raping of Europe.



tatals
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: Brazil

08 Apr 2016, 8:19 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
cathylynn wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
cathylynn wrote:
sounds like you are defensive and somewhat unaware of your privilege.
Are you aware of his privilege? Do you know his life story? Do you know if he grew up rich or poor?

Which privilege are you referring too? Do you believe all men are privileged? Including rich men, poor men, garbage men, disabled men, congressmen, airmen, firemen, unemployed men, are all these men privileged over all women?

How do you know whether or not he's aware of his privileges? Can you read his mind? Can you infer it from his post? Even though it wasn't actually about whether or not he's privileged?

Are you aware of your privilege? If you weren't you'd never know because how can you know about something you're not aware of. Do you have the ultimate privilege of not being aware of your privilege? If you did you'd never know it.

So since he has that privilege bestowed universally on all men, does that mean what he has to say doesn't matter? Because regardless of if he's rich or poor he's privileged so his opinion doesn't count? Does his opinion matter so little that it doesn't even warrant a proper counter argument? Is it better to use an argument that doesn't actually address the thing it's arguing against at all.

I understand, thinking of an argument that actually has something to do with the thing you're arguing against is very hard work. It's an ingenious labour saving device you have there.

You can just dismiss all male arguments with "you're unaware of your privilege" and that way you don't even have to formulate a real counter argument. It's so easy. This is the best debating technique since the strawman argument :D

he made no arguments, so there's nothing to answer. and yes, all males have privilege, as do all white people in america. i am white and i haven't regularly been followed in department stores as a potential thief.


Women have their privilege too, for instance....your government won't send you to the army in case your country gets invaded.
Another instance, househusbandry is not respected while housewivery is praised (even though it gets attacked by some feminists), you as a woman, you have the choice to either be working or to be a stay-at-home mom; men don't have this luxury, if a man fails to get a job then he instantly become a pariah (including in the dating market) - even dogs would be viewed more valuable than them by their govs; hence why there are way more homeless men than women.


Face of Boo, it reallt depends on the country in regards to the army. Some countries accept (or even reinforce, like Israel) women in combat.

Also, the other things you've pointed out are views strongly maintained by men. Many - if not most - men despise housework and feel that it's 'less' to be a housewife/househusband, for example.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

08 Apr 2016, 8:31 am

I feel being a housewife is dignified, actually.

In the old days (yes, when women had few legal rights), women used to manage entire households--almost like a CEO.

I must admit that I don't like cleaning house, and I'm not good at it.

The ideal relationship for me is for my lady to do the deep cleaning, and for me to do the heavy lifting.



259
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 27

08 Apr 2016, 9:42 am

CommanderKeen wrote:
Women get paid less, because they take positions that pay less, they generally work less and they take more time off to spend with family. If you want women to get paid more, more women need to go into fields such as engineering and not social science related fields.


Well, actually women get get paid less because women tend to be not brave enough to negotiate for higher pay, because women who negotiate for higher pay tend to be seen as greedy and unlikeable and won't be hired, and a job with less desirable pay is still preferred than no job at all.

Women have also been socialized to doubt themselves, and women who choose to appear confident tend to be seen as "b*****s" whereas men who make the same choice are not likely to receive the same penalty. There have even been studies along the line of college-level men and women having to take the same test and rate themselves, and women would consistently think they "deserve" less while men think they deserve more, when the average results would be more or less the same.

Feminism has always been about trying to change society as a whole, but how unsurprising it is that we have men who choose to interpret "society" as men and somehow make it all about themselves. I'm sure somewhere in the future there will be someone pointing to the above paragraphs and say something along the "women judge other women too!" Well, duh. Society comprises men and women and no one is zeroing on men as the root of the problems, and just like how a man can be a feminist a woman can be a misogynist.

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Women have their privilege too, for instance....your government won't send you to the army in case your country gets invaded.

Another instance, househusbandry is not respected while housewivery is praised (even though it gets attacked by some feminists), you as a woman, you have the choice to either be working or to be a stay-at-home mom; men don't have this luxury, if a man fails to get a job then he instantly become a pariah (including in the dating market) - even dogs would be viewed more valuable than them by their govs; hence why there are way more homeless men than women.


First of all, I take issue with the qualifier "some" used in the first sentence of the second paragraph. Some men rape women. Some men rape men. Some men are child molesters. So what? Feminism is the general idea that men and women should be equal and there are all kinds of interpretation for it, and what "some" subscribers of the idea do with it says nothing about the core idea behind feminism. It should also be kept in mind that feminists are humans and humans have flaws. Just because MLK, Jr. was unfaithful to his wife doesn't mean we should disregard what he did for the civil rights movement.

I don't disagree that men generally suffer for being or doing things are doing things that are generally considered "feminine," which only brings up two things. First, the problem that society thinks "feminine" is somehow less than "masculine." Second, the fact that the whole point of feminism is to change these double standards. Although you may be adamant about not seeing this, if you're being honest to yourself I think you'll find that the people who look down on househusbands are most likely the same people who scoff at feminism. In fact, let's just take currently famous political figures and google their views on feminism. I know I personally wouldn't be surprised by the results. And I would go into what women have to deal with then the time comes for them to make babies, but I'm sure someone else will be better equipped to do that.

AspieOtaku wrote:
Ill have to keep checking my priviledge, although I am autistic and not NT, I have qualified for SSI but reject it and want to earn my keep the hard way like everyone else, but am more privileged than an NT female. I was due for a promotion but rejected the promotion to allow a female who has worked at my job less to get a promotion, did i do the right thing? My managers were baffled and find me as one of their hardest workers in the cafe.


Why are we talking about you? We're talking about lack of inequality in society, not about you.

kraftiekortie wrote:
I feel being a housewife is dignified, actually.


Why are we talking about you? This isn't about how your personal view of being a housewife.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Apr 2016, 11:05 am

259, I didn't say feminism is against housewives, but I meant to say it it's only some feminists; I am sure many housewives who are even feminists themselves feel that hostility toward them from some of the radical feminists.

I do believe tho, that housewivery as a whole is harmful for women and it's one of the main causes of the pay gap (besides the ones you mentioned) - it's kind of a taboo that most women don't want to admit but being housewive means being financially weak; therefore automatically being dependent on a man; if a society has 30-40% of women as housewives then that's too much of weakness among women and it reinforces the traditional role of man as a provider and this would reflect on salaries:
As I explained before; when bosses divide the salary budget, they tend to give a plus to married men over women and single men because the logic goes that a married man might have a non-working wife while a married woman would be way more likely to have a working partner (truth: most women refuse to date non-working men), therefore the premium goes to married men.
The pay is almost non-existing between single men and single women, while moms are the least paid, check it out.

There are studies out there explain in detail why the role of housewive is harmful for women especially for working moms, and its impact on how employers think, I am not inventing anything from my own head.

For the to change, either housewivery has to go, or the idea of women accepting to marry men as househusband to become more common and more accepted to balance things and to change the idea (in the heads of employers) that the married man is always the provider.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Apr 2016, 11:27 am

Tatal,
Israel is an exception (yet most of their infantry who were sent here on 2006 july war to die were men, maybe all were men, I know Israel news well, check my country) , in most countries, even western countries, the call of duty is on men - and it had been so in the most of the human history of civilizations.

As for the other things, they are not only strongly maintained by men , by a lot of women too: many women won't even consider to date unemployed men, this is real - therefore that automatically means not accepting the houseband role on men.

Men hate housework because they were raised to not like it and to not get used to it.



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

08 Apr 2016, 1:10 pm

my husband does all the housework except cooking. i'm a full-time student and he's retired. he is the least ambitious person i know. never liked working outside the home.

most families in the US have both parents working outside the home, with women still unfairly doing most of the housework.



tatals
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: Brazil

08 Apr 2016, 2:08 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Tatal,
Israel is an exception (yet most of their infantry who were sent here on 2006 july war to die were men, maybe all were men, I know Israel news well, check my country) , in most countries, even western countries, the call of duty is on men - and it had been so in the most of the human history of civilizations.

As for the other things, they are not only strongly maintained by men , by a lot of women too: many women won't even consider to date unemployed men, this is real - therefore that automatically means not accepting the houseband role on men.

Men hate housework because they were raised to not like it and to not get used to it.


I understand. Even so, this is the kind of logic that is only applied to counter-attack feminists when they complain. Not the military part; I assume compulsory military service is not really fun for anyone. But I don't see many men complaining that they can't stay home and take care of the kids for real. I come from a very sexist culture, where househusbandry is looked down on. Men here usually laugh at the mere concept of staying home. And suddenly this so-called female privilege quickly becomes a valid argument against women's 'demands'.

I'm not saying there is no pressure over men. There definitely is. My point is that, if men are uncomfortable not being able to do something, then they should join the fight. I don't see housewivery as a privilege; rather a thing that was thrust upon the women all around me; few actually chose it. I'm actually very happy women before me fought to liberate me from this privilege. Maybe men could use some liberation on their part as well. :)



tatals
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: Brazil

08 Apr 2016, 2:40 pm

/\ Hum, didn't like this smiley. Makes it look like I'm laughing. Consider it a regular smiley face.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

08 Apr 2016, 3:27 pm

Now wait a second. I was reacting to Tatals' post.

I guess I should have specified that.

It's not nice to be so strident; we're not in a classroom here.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Apr 2016, 3:47 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Now wait a second. I was reacting to Tatals' post.

I guess I should have specified that.

It's not nice to be so strident; we're not in a classroom here.


I think 259 is the troll katy, but this has to be confirmed.



somaha
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

Joined: 7 Apr 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 6

08 Apr 2016, 4:01 pm

Outrider wrote:
Never said that at all.

I said, by identifying as a Feminist, by default you identify with a movement that, for the last couple of centuries since it first existed, from first wave Feminism to Third, was purely about fighting for women's rights and women's rights only, because in the past women were not equal to men.

Now, I find in today's western societies there are some ways in which men may be disadvantaged, and some ways women may be.

Some modern Feminist's may claim to be for men's rights as well, but by giving yourself the name women who only cared about women's rights used, your claims are far more easy to be questioned.

Actions speak louder than words, but sometimes the pen is mightier than the sword.

Even if you as a Feminist fight for men and women's rights equally, I believe, why not just SAY so, by calling yourself a GEA, Egalitarianist, Equalist - loads of things you could call yourself to convey that, instead of just conforming and resorting to 'Feminism'.



The word feminism says nothing about gender. Femi is from feminine wich is having qualities or an appearance traditionally associated with women, especially delicacy and prettiness.

Femininity is traditionally associated with women but men can be feminine to.
And saying that feminism is about women is saying that men cannot or are not allowed to be feminine.
Wich is opressing men.

Both men and women can be feminine and masculine.
But since feminine things are usually looked up as not as good as the things we lable masculine it is looked up on as a setback for a man to be or act feminine.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Apr 2016, 4:09 pm

Quote:
I understand. Even so, this is the kind of logic that is only applied to counter-attack feminists when they complain. Not the military part; I assume compulsory military service is not really fun for anyone. But I don't see many men complaining that they can't stay home and take care of the kids for real. I come from a very sexist culture, where househusbandry is looked down on. Men here usually laugh at the mere concept of staying home. And suddenly this so-called female privilege quickly becomes a valid argument against women's 'demands'.


Have you tried to ask women how they view on househusbandry? In my personal "survey" on the matter, all responses were flat no and mockery about it.

Let's not forget that the majority of world's population is religious; Islam makes it clear that it's the man's duty to feed the family - and even if the mother makes her kids starve for choosing not to work then it wouldn't be a sin on her, but on the her husband.

Traditional Christianity has a similar view on the role of the man. 'But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever' (1 Timothy 5:8 ESV).

Atheists/Agnostics/Untypically-religious are still a minority in the world.



Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 08 Apr 2016, 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Apr 2016, 4:12 pm

Quote:

The word feminism says nothing about gender. Femi is from feminine wich is having qualities or an appearance traditionally associated with women, especially delicacy and prettiness.

Femininity is traditionally associated with women but men can be feminine to.
And saying that feminism is about women is saying that men cannot or are not allowed to be feminine.
Wich is opressing men.

Both men and women can be feminine and masculine.
But since feminine things are usually looked up as not as good as the things we lable masculine it is looked up on as a setback for a man to be or act feminine.

[/quote]

A woman who behaves masculine or shows masculine traits isn't seen positively either.

It's not Feminine = bad while Masculine = good in the absolute sense.

In reality, it's not like that.

What it is more like:
Feminine is seen bad if it's expressed by men.
Masculine is seen bad if it's expressed by women.

Try to cut your hair as a guy for instance, and check the negative comments/glances.

Or try to behave like a typical man by the way you sit down, eat, and talk... most people won't like it, people usually won't feel comfortable for something outside the norm, they won't see your "Masculine" traits as good.



xile123
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 495
Location: australia

08 Apr 2016, 5:57 pm

Hell no. Feminism is terrorism and most (if not all) feminist are mentally ill/dysfunctional.