Our New President - President Donald Trump

Post Reply New Topic

And this Clinton/Obama scandal is also coming to a head -- Obama's people basically running a government shakedown operation and feeding the proceeds to private leftist organizations. Gangster government at its finest.

Emails Show Obama’s DOJ Channeled ‘Slush Fund’ Money To Leftist Orgs

We are into the second week of major revelations regarding Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration. Not a single one of these revelations are pretty, and every single one involves skirting the law and essentially throwing the United States under the bus. We’ve written multiple times about the craptastic Uranium One deal and are covering the Clinton/DNC Trump Dossier collusion racket as well.

The Obama Administration, along with Hillary has much to answer for regarding both of those. But that’s not all. There’s a THIRD scandal that hit this morning as well.

On Tuesday, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte revealed that documents obtained in a separate, ongoing investigation show that former President Barack Obama’s administration directed money intended for victims of Wall Street mortgage meddling to progressive activist organizations who now form much of the “resistance” to President Donald Trump.

http://victorygirlsblog.com/emails-show ... rgs-video/

Are The Washington Post and Fox News owned by Trump supporter Rupert Murdoch by any chance?

Far as I can tell, the Washington Post does front page hit pierces on Trump on daily basis. I'm sure they've made a fortune off it.

Thank you. Is it true that Trump was pushing the Uranium claims over a year ago?

Murdoch owns WSJ

Trump supporters and Trump himself think the recent Washington Post stories about that make Obama and the Clintons look really bad are not "fake news" and not a deep state conspiracy(LOL).

What makes a report fake news is when there's a lack of tangible evedence, anonymous sources, pure speculation, sensationalism etc. It just so happens that a propensity of the above seem applicable to many news stories about Trump, especially from the Washington Post.

The Wall Street Journal's editorial page today gives a good summary of the emerging picture. There was collusion with the Russians to influence the outcome of the election -- collusion by the Democrats.

Democrats, Russians and the FBI
Did the bureau use disinformation to trigger its Trump probe?

It turns out that Russia has sown distrust in the U.S. political system—aided and abetted by the Democratic Party, and perhaps the FBI. This is an about-face from the dominant media narrative of the last year, and it requires a full investigation.

The Washington Post revealed Tuesday that the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee jointly paid for that infamous “dossier” full of Russian disinformation against Donald Trump. They filtered the payments through a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie), which hired the opposition-research hit men at Fusion GPS. Fusion in turn tapped a former British spook, Christopher Steele, to compile the allegations, which are based largely on anonymous, Kremlin-connected sources.

Strip out the middlemen, and it appears that Democrats paid for Russians to compile wild allegations about a U.S. presidential candidate. Did someone say “collusion”?

This news is all the more explosive because the DNC and Clinton campaign hid their role, even amid the media furor after BuzzFeed published the Steele dossier in January. Reporters are now saying that Clinton campaign officials lied to them about their role in the dossier. Current DNC Chair Tom Perez and former Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz deny knowing about the dossier arrangement, but someone must have known.

Perhaps this explains why Congressional Democrats have been keen to protect Fusion from answering dossier questions—disrupting hearings, protesting subpoenas and deriding Republican investigators. Two of Fusion’s cofounders invoked their Fifth Amendment rights last week rather than answer House Intelligence Committee questions, and Fusion filed a federal lawsuit on Friday to block committee subpoenas of its bank records.

The more troubling question is whether the FBI played a role, even if inadvertently, in assisting a Russian disinformation campaign. We know the agency possessed the dossier in 2016, and according to media reports it debated paying Mr. Steele to continue his work in the runup to the election. This occurred while former FBI Director James Comey was ramping up his probe into supposed ties between the Trump campaign and Russians.

Two pertinent questions: Did the dossier trigger the FBI probe of the Trump campaign, and did Mr. Comey or his agents use it as evidence to seek wiretapping approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Trump campaign aides?

http://archive.is/M3Iak

There's few things more amusing than a plot backfiring, if that's the case here.

A real scandal to get excited about: the appointment of Wilbur Ross. Much more interesting than the Trump sideshows "look over there not at me" currently occupying the minds of his true believers.