ASPartOfMe wrote:
So I guess even I underestimated the length the wokes will go to expand definitions in order to entrap people for cancelation purposes. We keep on being told the expanded definitions are descriptive and not meant to necessarily judge the offender as a bad person. And yet this person apparently got in trouble at work for it.
Over the last 20 years I've actually had run ins with LGBTQI, indigenous and students with mental health issues as a tutor because I did not use appropriate language or used case studies which were ignorant to their sensitivities. The outcome of these is I try to learn.
Yes, members of all these groups can be quite vocal about their self-awareness or activism re: interactions. However, the idea you can be cancelled is overblown. Any rationale person knows the difference between legitimate ignorance (for example not capitalising the word "Aboriginal") and intentional ignorance.
I honestly respect your intellect AS, but I don't know why you want to get into bed with Dox, Raptor and Glitch over this? the critical ingredient here is intent.
Intentional ignorance is being hurtful
because you want to stand your ground on your right to say whatever you want. The latter is a problem and you'll notice those who have been cancelled in the media it's glaringly obvious their intent was to be funny at the expense of the group they were denigrating.