ObamaGate is getting big
All this Russia hysteria is not only absurd, but very dangerous.
And yet he talks to Putin every night, by his own admission. When asked if he ever asked Putin to stop interfering with our elections, he said that they never had the time to broach that subject.
There's a term the intelligence agencies have for putting on a phony act as cover: guerrilla theater. Explains "ramping up" Anti-Russian action without actually accomplishing anything.
Yeah, I remember that question -- and Trump's response. He was just trolling the media.
Well, theories are certainly in no short supply. Rachael Maddow has made quite a career out of it for three years -- along with fear mongering. She sunk the lowest when, during the outbreak of frigid weather this winter, she ramped up the Russia hysteria by explaining how easy it would be for Russia to attack our power grid. Unbelievable! Thank goodness we have real journalists like Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, and Aarron Mate to put all this BS into perspective.
I don't want a President who trolls his audience. I want someone with austere dignity who speaks in clear and direct terms to the American people, as Barack Obama or even Bush I and II did.
I don't believe Rachel is wrong.
I wasn't condoning Trump's trollish behavior; merely pointing out that it most certainly wasn't an admission of guilt. The only difference Trump and his predecessors is he stripped the respectable, phony facade from the presidency. But I guess it's nice to have a nice, smiling, respectable face while you're committing war crimes.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Drip, drip, drip.
The story has been clear for some time: senior officials within the CIA and FBI conspired with foreign agents to overturn a US presidential election. Hands down the biggest political scandal in American history.
FBI's Steele story falls apart: False intel and media contacts were flagged before FISA
The FBI’s sworn story to a federal court about its asset, Christopher Steele, is fraying faster than a $5 souvenir T-shirt bought at a tourist trap.
Newly unearthed memos show a high-ranking government official who met with Steele in October 2016 determined some of the Donald Trump dirt that Steele was simultaneously digging up for the FBI and for Hillary Clinton’s campaign was inaccurate, and likely leaked to the media.
The concerns were flagged in a typed memo and in handwritten notes taken by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec on Oct. 11, 2016.
Her observations were recorded exactly 10 days before the FBI used Steele and his infamous dossier to justify securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and the campaign’s contacts with Russia in search of a now debunked collusion theory.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house ... re-flagged
_________________
There Are Four Lights!
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
All this Russia hysteria is not only absurd, but very dangerous.
And yet he talks to Putin every night, by his own admission. When asked if he ever asked Putin to stop interfering with our elections, he said that they never had the time to broach that subject.
There's a term the intelligence agencies have for putting on a phony act as cover: guerrilla theater. Explains "ramping up" Anti-Russian action without actually accomplishing anything.
Yeah, I remember that question -- and Trump's response. He was just trolling the media.
Well, theories are certainly in no short supply. Rachael Maddow has made quite a career out of it for three years -- along with fear mongering. She sunk the lowest when, during the outbreak of frigid weather this winter, she ramped up the Russia hysteria by explaining how easy it would be for Russia to attack our power grid. Unbelievable! Thank goodness we have real journalists like Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, and Aarron Mate to put all this BS into perspective.
I don't want a President who trolls his audience. I want someone with austere dignity who speaks in clear and direct terms to the American people, as Barack Obama or even Bush I and II did.
I don't believe Rachel is wrong.
I wasn't condoning Trump's trollish behavior; merely pointing out that it most certainly wasn't an admission of guilt. The only difference Trump and his predecessors is he stripped the respectable, phony facade from the presidency. But I guess it's nice to have a nice, smiling, respectable face while you're committing war crimes.
No, I'd rather have a President who doesn't commit war crimes, and is also reserved and articulate, and doesn't stir up the worst impulses and prejudices among his supporters.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
All this Russia hysteria is not only absurd, but very dangerous.
And yet he talks to Putin every night, by his own admission. When asked if he ever asked Putin to stop interfering with our elections, he said that they never had the time to broach that subject.
There's a term the intelligence agencies have for putting on a phony act as cover: guerrilla theater. Explains "ramping up" Anti-Russian action without actually accomplishing anything.
Yeah, I remember that question -- and Trump's response. He was just trolling the media.
Well, theories are certainly in no short supply. Rachael Maddow has made quite a career out of it for three years -- along with fear mongering. She sunk the lowest when, during the outbreak of frigid weather this winter, she ramped up the Russia hysteria by explaining how easy it would be for Russia to attack our power grid. Unbelievable! Thank goodness we have real journalists like Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, and Aarron Mate to put all this BS into perspective.
I don't want a President who trolls his audience. I want someone with austere dignity who speaks in clear and direct terms to the American people, as Barack Obama or even Bush I and II did.
I don't believe Rachel is wrong.
I wasn't condoning Trump's trollish behavior; merely pointing out that it most certainly wasn't an admission of guilt. The only difference Trump and his predecessors is he stripped the respectable, phony facade from the presidency. But I guess it's nice to have a nice, smiling, respectable face while you're committing war crimes.
No, I'd rather have a President who doesn't commit war crimes, and is also reserved and articulate, and doesn't stir up the worst impulses and prejudices among his supporters.
Me too.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
All this Russia hysteria is not only absurd, but very dangerous.
And yet he talks to Putin every night, by his own admission. When asked if he ever asked Putin to stop interfering with our elections, he said that they never had the time to broach that subject.
There's a term the intelligence agencies have for putting on a phony act as cover: guerrilla theater. Explains "ramping up" Anti-Russian action without actually accomplishing anything.
Yeah, I remember that question -- and Trump's response. He was just trolling the media.
Well, theories are certainly in no short supply. Rachael Maddow has made quite a career out of it for three years -- along with fear mongering. She sunk the lowest when, during the outbreak of frigid weather this winter, she ramped up the Russia hysteria by explaining how easy it would be for Russia to attack our power grid. Unbelievable! Thank goodness we have real journalists like Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, and Aarron Mate to put all this BS into perspective.
I don't want a President who trolls his audience. I want someone with austere dignity who speaks in clear and direct terms to the American people, as Barack Obama or even Bush I and II did.
I don't believe Rachel is wrong.
I wasn't condoning Trump's trollish behavior; merely pointing out that it most certainly wasn't an admission of guilt. The only difference Trump and his predecessors is he stripped the respectable, phony facade from the presidency. But I guess it's nice to have a nice, smiling, respectable face while you're committing war crimes.
No, I'd rather have a President who doesn't commit war crimes, and is also reserved and articulate, and doesn't stir up the worst impulses and prejudices among his supporters.
Me too.

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
What makes you think so? Trump has admitted guilt before. When he fired Comey, the one thing he should have done to keep up the nice, smiling respectable face of no obstruction was to stick to the original cover story that he fired Comey over the Clinton email investigation. But then Trump told Lester Holt, on camera, that he fired Comey over the Russia investigation. He told the Russians that firing Comey had taken a lot of pressure off him over the Russia thing. The New York Times ran that story of Trump losing a billion dollars in the 80s. Trump tweeted that he didn't lose money, he just fiddled his taxes, probably because he thinks that makes him smart, as he said in one of his debates with Clinton.
For someone who claims to hate both main parties, you spend a lot of time defending the guy who is the most extreme manifestaton of all their worst traits. Why? I really don't understand that.
Because I can tell when someone is taking the piss. It's as simple as that.
What you see as defending Trump is merely applying critical thinking skills to criticisms against him. I've explained my opinion over and over until I'm blue in the face. If you don't get it, you don't get it.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder
You can insist it's a matter of 'not getting it' all you like, but ever consider that your explanations simply don't hold water outside your own mind?

_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
You can insist it's a matter of 'not getting it' all you like, but ever consider that your explanations simply don't hold water outside your own mind?

The only people with whom they don't hold water are those who can't think outside of the left/right paradigm. There are plenty of decent independent journalists who share my views on this topic, most of them progressives, and none of them Trump supporters.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder
You can insist it's a matter of 'not getting it' all you like, but ever consider that your explanations simply don't hold water outside your own mind?

The only people with whom they don't hold water are those who can't think outside of the left/right paradigm.
Based on the posters who disagreed with you this is clearly yet another untruthful statement. Thanks for playing.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
I agree, there's zero evidence Trump isn't a foreign agent.

On the other hand, no matter how many times you insist on ignoring the evidence which other posters have so graciously posted, that evidence does exist. Personally, I'm not playing this game because I know you'll refuse to recognize reality no matter how much evidence is provided so long as it doesn't support your claims.
The burden of proof is on those pushing the Russiagate hoax conspiracy theory. You've yet to provide any because there is nothing.
Other posters have already posted evidence that you've chosen to ignore. You can keep insisting there's no evidence, but you're starting to sound as comical as Dear Leader still insisting 'no collusion'. It's irrelevant whether or not you accept reality, because reality will continue to be reality even if you insist on ignoring it. Good luck with that approach, you'll need it.
I've been debunking it for 3 years. It's been proven to be a hoax as there is zero evidence and people still push the conspiracy theory. Shameful. Trump is Israel's puppet.
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
Yeah Bush Jr was such a great speaker
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I don't doubt that there is truth to this as well. The one doesn't preclude the other and would help explain the appearance of his loyalties being conflicted in some instances, although the other factor is likely that he's not particularly loyal to any entity except himself.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
The only thing Russiagate has done is to direct attention away from actual Trump policies, which is what the resistance should be focusing on. Aarron Mate made an excellent point in an interview shortly after the whole conspiracy theory fell apart. Before Russiagate really took hold, you had people protesting what Trump was doing -- like implementing the ban on Muslims. Once the MSM latched onto Russiagate, that's all they focused on. And those who still buy into it fail to realize it's done nothing but empower Trump -- not to mention ramp up the new cold war, which is dangerous and insane.
I
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I
There's no reason one can't believe that the conclusions of the report aren't relevant, without also taking issue with his policies. I don't disagree that the media regularly choose to let this topic suck must of the oxygen from the room, but that doesn't mean individuals should follow their lead. Placing too much hope in this as the silver bullet that will take him down is a mistake, that doesn't mean that it's completely irrelevant and shouldn't ever been spoken of.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
I don't doubt that there is truth to this as well. The one doesn't preclude the other and would help explain the appearance of his loyalties being conflicted in some instances, although the other factor is likely that he's not particularly loyal to any entity except himself.
All Trump has done is help Israel and hurt Russia, so no. He likes Putin and listens to him. And so he should listen to him.
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"