Why is the world as messed up as it is?
I'm not impressed with your doubts.
The tides of history are what they are though. My only hope is to simply keep my wits through all of it. I don't control the world, I can't, thus I can only do what I can from my own sphere and hope I'm making a better place within my own sphere of existence.
I wish you'd get your goddamn quotes right. Putting your words in my mouth makes me gag. Your confidence in the control of free floating atom bombs is somewhere down there in the basement of perceptive observation.
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
Perhaps this is not the place for confessing your sins.
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,593
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
Lol, that's usually a trick your better at - quoting what I said and sandwiching your words somewhere up between the paragraphs - takes me a while to find some of your responses.
On the other hand what's a better way of looking at it? Go emo and cut myself every time I think about these things? Enough people in the world understand the risks of this sort of thing that there's at least somewhat of a bulwark against it. Not saying it'll last forever or that I won't see another nuclear war incident or even nuclear terrorism in my lifetime, just that for as much as we've got out there - I'm just impressed and somewhat inspired that we haven't blown ourselves off the map already, for as idiotic as human beings are we've been unnaturally lucky in this regard.
This idea I agree with. I know the reason the U.S. is so screwed up right now, is because the majority of people are either ignorant, selfish, or greedy, and they don't give a crap about the environment. The economic collapse, high energy prices, and screwed up weather, is the universe's way of forcing us to change our ways.
This idea I agree with. I know the reason the U.S. is so screwed up right now, is because the majority of people are either ignorant, selfish, or greedy, and they don't give a crap about the environment. The economic collapse, high energy prices, and screwed up weather, is the universe's way of forcing us to change our ways.
Have no fear. Nature has its ways. Humanity will either have to shape up or be destroyed. Nature has no mercy.
I'm optimistic, though. The world is better now than it was a few thousand years ago, and I suspect the trend will continue.
That's not a point of view appreciated by whales, elephants, bisons, the dodo or the passenger pigeon.
I'm optimistic, though. The world is better now than it was a few thousand years ago, and I suspect the trend will continue.
That's not a point of view appreciated by whales, elephants, bisons, the dodo or the passenger pigeon.
It's also not a point of view that would have been appreciated by the third world, until fairly recently.
These days we've also started expanding our considerations to other species. In a hundred years or so, we will probably be treating them much better, too.
I'm optimistic, though. The world is better now than it was a few thousand years ago, and I suspect the trend will continue.
That's not a point of view appreciated by whales, elephants, bisons, the dodo or the passenger pigeon.
It's also not a point of view that would have been appreciated by the third world, until fairly recently.
.
I think the people living in the 3rd world were a lot better off a few thousand years ago than they are now. Back then they had to contend with disease and an unpredictable food supply, with war from time to time. Now they have to contend with disease, an unpredictable food supply, ecological poisoning, refugee camps, dictatorships, and in some quarters a state of war which literally never ends. They were better off before.
I'm optimistic, though. The world is better now than it was a few thousand years ago, and I suspect the trend will continue.
That's not a point of view appreciated by whales, elephants, bisons, the dodo or the passenger pigeon.
It's also not a point of view that would have been appreciated by the third world, until fairly recently.
These days we've also started expanding our considerations to other species. In a hundred years or so, we will probably be treating them much better, too.
Considering the way things are going, in a century there won't be anything to treat better.
I'm optimistic, though. The world is better now than it was a few thousand years ago, and I suspect the trend will continue.
That's not a point of view appreciated by whales, elephants, bisons, the dodo or the passenger pigeon.
It's also not a point of view that would have been appreciated by the third world, until fairly recently.
.
I think the people living in the 3rd world were a lot better off a few thousand years ago than they are now. Back then they had to contend with disease and an unpredictable food supply, with war from time to time. Now they have to contend with disease, an unpredictable food supply, ecological poisoning, refugee camps, dictatorships, and in some quarters a state of war which literally never ends. They were better off before.
Violence has been declining in the developed world for centuries; as the third world becomes more developed, we will hopefully see a similar trend. One also then has to consider the other positive goods such as better medical care and better education, two things which developing countries are already benefitting greatly from. I mean, I'm not saying that it's a paradise, or even particularly good. But it never has been.
I'm optimistic, though. The world is better now than it was a few thousand years ago, and I suspect the trend will continue.
That's not a point of view appreciated by whales, elephants, bisons, the dodo or the passenger pigeon.
It's also not a point of view that would have been appreciated by the third world, until fairly recently.
These days we've also started expanding our considerations to other species. In a hundred years or so, we will probably be treating them much better, too.
Considering the way things are going, in a century there won't be anything to treat better.
The main existential risk at the moment is climate change. If we can develop more environmentally friendly technology, and if we can also adapt to the changes which are going to come anyway, because of the damage that's already been done, then we can look forward to a wonderful future. I think we can do both those things.
I say it's the flawed nature of people...period.
A psychologist told me this when I made the comment that children were rotten little bits of evil.
He laughed because he spent his early years working with children, and his observations confirmed what my opinion was.
Simply put, short of the upbringing/discipline that parents and society give kids, they would turn into feral monsters on their own.
All the problems of society can be traced to a single word....LUST.
Man lusts for many things. Food, drink, money, power, sex, etc. and we find ways (both civilized and primitive) to satisfy those lusts.
If we are enlightened, we respect that our lusts can only be satisfied so long as they don't victimize others. However, many people (both civilized and primitive) see no reason why THEY should have to curtail THEIR lusts and they find ways (both supposedly civilized and primitive) to take from others until they satisfy their lusts.
A psychologist told me this when I made the comment that children were rotten little bits of evil.
He laughed because he spent his early years working with children, and his observations confirmed what my opinion was.
Simply put, short of the upbringing/discipline that parents and society give kids, they would turn into feral monsters on their own.
All the problems of society can be traced to a single word....LUST.
Man lusts for many things. Food, drink, money, power, sex, etc. and we find ways (both civilized and primitive) to satisfy those lusts.
If we are enlightened, we respect that our lusts can only be satisfied so long as they don't victimize others. However, many people (both civilized and primitive) see no reason why THEY should have to curtail THEIR lusts and they find ways (both supposedly civilized and primitive) to take from others until they satisfy their lusts.
Lust is a prejudicial term. If a person needs food and clothing and a place to sleep I would hardly term a need for those basic necessities as lust.
Prejudicial, but accurate.
Lust is want in excess of need. You need your "daily bread" but if you demand champagne and caviar, that's lust.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Does Anybody Here Know Dandy's World Or Is Familiar With It? |
24 May 2025, 1:05 am |
Á world without fiction of any kind. |
16 Jul 2025, 9:08 pm |
Dandy's World Characters I HC As Autistic |
13 May 2025, 3:17 pm |
how popular was mario kart world in your city? |
07 Jun 2025, 12:11 am |