Atheism and Agnosticism's Role in Western Intellectualism

Page 3 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

05 Jun 2010, 4:32 pm

Asmodeus wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I see agnostics as generally being more intellectually minded and atheists as generally feeling as though they were.

Do I detect a Christian, through his attribution of intellectualism based upon religious belief (or a lack therof)?

This is why we don't think you are strident enough to make the list. Everybody KNOWS that he is a Christian and young earth creationist. If you are just now detecting it, then I am sorry, you are way too late. :P



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

06 Jun 2010, 2:08 am

ruveyn wrote:
Agnosticism is literally "don't know" from its Greek root words.

ruveyn

Few atheists have argued that "don't know" means lack of belief, and well, if you don't know about X it means that you just don't believe what is claimed about X as belief implies having a level of certainty.
From what I have seen, atheists have categorized agnosticism as weak atheism.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Asmodeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520

06 Jun 2010, 6:16 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Asmodeus wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I see agnostics as generally being more intellectually minded and atheists as generally feeling as though they were.

Do I detect a Christian, through his attribution of intellectualism based upon religious belief (or a lack therof)?

This is why we don't think you are strident enough to make the list. Everybody KNOWS that he is a Christian and young earth creationist. If you are just now detecting it, then I am sorry, you are way too late. :P

I already knew he's Chrstian and YEC, I meant that such an attribution originated solely from those beliefs and not his experience. You are confusing my rhetoric for a lack of knowledge. Do you consider yours powerful enough to deserve such a title? :P



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

06 Jun 2010, 10:30 am

Asmodeus wrote:
Do you consider yours powerful enough to deserve such a title? :P

Have you SEEN how often I use the term STRIDENT?



Asmodeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520

06 Jun 2010, 10:40 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Asmodeus wrote:
Do you consider yours powerful enough to deserve such a title? :P

Have you SEEN how often I use the term STRIDENT?

Repetition, non-rational appeal.

Almost a religious approach, wouldn't you agree?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Jun 2010, 10:43 am

In the West the twilight of the gods began 2500 years ago in Ionia (a part of Greece) when natural laws and principles began to replace the whim of the gods. This has continued (although with set backs) to this day. There was a dark period in Western history when the gods reigned and churches ruled. But since the enlightenment the progress started in Ionia has continued. Bit by bit, step by step the grip of the gods on the minds of Westerners is decreasing. The U.S. is one of the last bastion of the gods in the industrialized world, but even here the grip of god is loosening.

ruveyn



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

06 Jun 2010, 10:43 am

Asmodeus wrote:
Repetition, non-rational appeal.

Almost a religious approach, wouldn't you agree?

Well.... um..... Dent is a Marxist.

That being said, this is a political approach, a field entirely based upon non-rational appeals and idiotic methods. People are animals and complex, so even non-rational appeals can be powerful and helpful in getting them to make the right choice. (one major online atheist mentions that an insult was what really got him thinking)



Asmodeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520

06 Jun 2010, 2:58 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Asmodeus wrote:
Repetition, non-rational appeal.

Almost a religious approach, wouldn't you agree?

Well.... um..... Dent is a Marxist.

That being said, this is a political approach, a field entirely based upon non-rational appeals and idiotic methods. People are animals and complex, so even non-rational appeals can be powerful and helpful in getting them to make the right choice. (one major online atheist mentions that an insult was what really got him thinking)

So you are a popularist atheist, not a rational one?



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

06 Jun 2010, 4:42 pm

Asmodeus wrote:
So you are a popularist atheist, not a rational one?

I am a skeptic, and a cunning atheist. I don't appeal to being "rational" outside jokes for the simple understanding of the mind that allows me to recognize that ALL people are crazier than they want to think.