Jacoby wrote:
honestly the redskins are the only indian team name that I can really see how it's insulting. and that's one that's never going to change. Marquette University changed their athletics team name from the Warriors to Golden Eagles because it might of offended some Indians.
The state of Illinois was named after the Illini (or Illiniwek) Indians who originally lived here. As a result of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, all American Indian residents of Illinois were force-marched to what is now Kansas (and were later removed from Kansas to Oklahoma). American soldiers burned their homes and farms behind them.
Naming a team the Minnesota Vikings probably wouldn't be offensive to anyone, given the way that descendents of Vikings were welcomed into American society (particularly in Minnesota). The name might possibly be offensive in some European areas that Vikings had ravaged.
For the University of Illinois to adopt a team name and a mascot to represent a group of people that were completed ejected and rejected from the state would be like Germany naming a sports team "The Fighting Jews", or Turkey naming a team "The Armenians", or Israel naming a team "The Palestinians."
The Illini didn't have quite as far to march as the Seminoles, who actually did put up a fight, and of whom some eventually took to hiding in the everglades to evade capture and deportation. But, naming a team "The Seminoles", what does that have to do with Florida football culture? Why not just name them the 'Crackers?'
And, what do the American people really know about "the truth?"