Page 3 of 4 [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

11 Jun 2011, 12:55 am

I just think it's pretty silly to believe that you can save money by buying a new car.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

11 Jun 2011, 9:27 am

blauSamstag wrote:
I just think it's pretty silly to believe that you can save money by buying a new car.


Well, if your car gets old enough that you're spending hundreds or thousands of dollars every month on repairs, then buying a new car will save money.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Jun 2011, 9:38 am

pandabear wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:
I just think it's pretty silly to believe that you can save money by buying a new car.


Well, if your car gets old enough that you're spending hundreds or thousands of dollars every month on repairs, then buying a new car will save money.


If one holds on to a new car for ten to fifteen years and maintains it properly it is works out well on a per year basis. I am still driving by 1995 Honda Civic. It runs like a champ.

ruveyn



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

11 Jun 2011, 9:44 am

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:
I just think it's pretty silly to believe that you can save money by buying a new car.


Well, if your car gets old enough that you're spending hundreds or thousands of dollars every month on repairs, then buying a new car will save money.


If one holds on to a new car for ten to fifteen years and maintains it properly it is works out well on a per year basis. I am still driving by 1995 Honda Civic. It runs like a champ.

ruveyn


I've generally heard much better things (particularly concerning reliability) about Japanese-built cars versus other cars.



MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland

11 Jun 2011, 3:51 pm

pandabear wrote:
It looks like demand for the Chevy Volt has picked up

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43332779/ns ... e_economy/

Quote:
Higher oil prices have sparked a major shift in car buying habits, for example. U.S. car dealers last month reported continued strong demand for smaller, fuel efficient vehicles. General Motors is considering adding a second shift to the Detroit plant that makes the electric Chevy Volt. Ford said Friday it plans to triple production of electric cars by 2013.


Adding another shift is not a reaction to oil prices, but rather, increasing availability.

Image

The Volt is supposed to be available nationwide before year's end but ordering your volt started yesterday. On average, between the states that it was available in, early adopters took in 1500 initial sales, but demand in these markets fell to around 500-1000 units a month. It's base price has fallen from the low 40 thousands into the upper 30 thousands which will bring a wee-bit closer to the leaf but is still priced beyond the point of relevancy and GM needs to sell a lot of these to justify even building this car with taxpayer dollars. If we magnify early adopters in DC, New York, Michigan, Texas, and California, to include all states which will probably not as eager to embrace the VOLT... unless GM finds a way to lower costs, units sold will not come close to making up the millions poured into bringing this car so early to market.


_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

11 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm

Isn't there an issue involving recharging them so that you need an electrician to rewire at the very least your garage and possibly your entire house.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

11 Jun 2011, 4:17 pm

No, Inuyasha, it is not an apple computer.

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Still, you have to plug the car into your home electrical outlet. That must run up your electric bill quite a bit. Plus, a lot of our electricity comes from coal. So, it might not help as much with pollution as one might hope.


When we start generating electricity by means other than hydrocarbon burning, electric cars will make more sense.

ruveyn

I think this is a chicken and egg argument. Electric cars make sense already, simply because there are more ways to generate energy for those cars. It means that electric are not locked in a specific technology or material.

It is of course true that right now it is all coal in the US for electricity. But the past is not the future. When US changes to a better means of energy production, like nuclear it would be most convenient to already have most cars electric, that would help us benefit from the new energy's features more quickly than waiting for the change before starting the slow migration.


_________________
.


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

12 Jun 2011, 8:51 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
No, Inuyasha, it is not an apple computer.

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Still, you have to plug the car into your home electrical outlet. That must run up your electric bill quite a bit. Plus, a lot of our electricity comes from coal. So, it might not help as much with pollution as one might hope.


When we start generating electricity by means other than hydrocarbon burning, electric cars will make more sense.

ruveyn

I think this is a chicken and egg argument. Electric cars make sense already, simply because there are more ways to generate energy for those cars. It means that electric are not locked in a specific technology or material.

It is of course true that right now it is all coal in the US for electricity. But the past is not the future. When US changes to a better means of energy production, like nuclear it would be most convenient to already have most cars electric, that would help us benefit from the new energy's features more quickly than waiting for the change before starting the slow migration.


Maybe so. But nothing smells so good as burning coal. Much better than cigarettes.

By the way, some coal (although less than previously) is used to heat homes. The Argonne National Laboratories still has a big old-fashioned coal-burning plant to heat all of the building on the site. There are ducts weaving around the site to bring heat from the coal plant to the individual buildings.



CrinklyCrustacean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

13 Jun 2011, 4:23 am

MarketAndChurch wrote:
Quote:
Corporate giants force developing countries to privatize their water supply for profit. Wall Street investors target desalination and mass bulk water export schemes. Corrupt governments use water for economic and political gain. Military control of water emerges and a new geo-political map and power structure forms, setting the stage for world water wars.

:P It looks like the war has already started in Thailand:

Image



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

13 Jun 2011, 8:33 am

That would be the annual Songkhran, which Thai people celebrate by dowsing each other with water.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

13 Jun 2011, 8:40 am

CrinklyCrustacean wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
Quote:
Corporate giants force developing countries to privatize their water supply for profit. Wall Street investors target desalination and mass bulk water export schemes. Corrupt governments use water for economic and political gain. Military control of water emerges and a new geo-political map and power structure forms, setting the stage for world water wars.

:P It looks like the war has already started in Thailand:

Image
Keep having fun.

I live in one of the places where we had an actual water war thanks to corporate giants. It wasn't funny.


_________________
.


CrinklyCrustacean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
CrinklyCrustacean wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
Quote:
Corporate giants force developing countries to privatize their water supply for profit. Wall Street investors target desalination and mass bulk water export schemes. Corrupt governments use water for economic and political gain. Military control of water emerges and a new geo-political map and power structure forms, setting the stage for world water wars.

:P It looks like the war has already started in Thailand:

Image
Keep having fun.

Thanks, I shall. :)

Quote:
I live in one of the places where we had an actual water war thanks to corporate giants. It wasn't funny.

Probably not, but it's pretty harmless as far as humour on PPR goes. :)



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 Jun 2011, 11:02 am

The Chevy Volt is just another car. I'd prefer a Rhodes "car".



Jojoba
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 7 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 260

14 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm

Saw this article the other day, which would be related to the Volt and other electric plug in autos.

"British Study: Electric Cars Not So Green"
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/06/13/br ... -so-green/

Excerpt:

Quote:
The past few days have been a one-two punch to the eco-friendly market. First we heard that biodegradable products are not nearly as environmentally friendly as advertised, and now this:
ELECTRIC cars could produce higher emissions over their lifetimes than petrol equivalents because of the energy consumed in making their batteries, a study has found.
An electric car owner would have to drive at least 129,000km before producing a net saving in CO2. Many electric cars will not travel that far in their lifetime because they typically have a range of less than 145km on a single charge and are unsuitable for long trips. Even those driven 160,000km would save only about a tonne of CO2 over their lifetimes.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

09 Sep 2011, 10:59 am

The Chevrolet Volt got a write-up in this month's Consumer Reports.

If you're only driving 35 miles per day, and recharge the battery every night (and thus run on electricity alone), then your cost, based on national-average electricity rates, is 4 cents per mile.

However, for those of us who live in areas with actual winters, the electric heater is rather poor.

Once you've used up the battery and the motor kicks in, then you're only getting 29 mpg (compared to 44 mpg for a Toyota Prius or 40 mpg for a Honda Civic Hybrid). A 90 mile trip ends up costing more in a Chevrolet Volt compared to these two cars.

Plus, you pay up front about $20,000 more for the Chevrolet Volt than you do for either of these two Japanese cars.

I've already learned my lesson: DON'T buy American cars--just get a Japanese car. The Japanese make better cars, any way you look at it.



number5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,691
Location: sunny philadelphia

09 Sep 2011, 12:41 pm

pandabear wrote:

I've already learned my lesson: DON'T buy American cars--just get a Japanese car. The Japanese make better cars, any way you look at it.


I thought Saturn made a good car. Very efficient, well built, cheap to fix, but apparently it was too efficient (from the owner's point of view). Not enough profit for the makers and so it goes... :(