pandabear wrote:
So, how do you account for the obvious differences? Has the flight-attendant profession lost its lustre among young, sexy Americans?
"Discrimination" has become a dirty word in the American lexicon, thanks in large measure to the efforts of those dirty "Liberals." But, the airline industry is a competitive business, and Management is no doubt aware of the fact that many passengers would much prefer to be pampered by beautiful, charming young stewardesses, rather than be served by frumpy, overweight, old women.
Is "Discrimination" necessarily a bad idea?
This thread is a crack up.
Yes, the profession has lost it's luster among young, sexy Americans. I grew up in the days when young girls still dreamed of being flight attendants, hard to figure out why looking back. Maybe because we had less choices to start with? It beat being a typist. But face it, the job isn't all that great, and somewhere between when I was 10 and I was 18 I became well aware that a stewardess was nothing but a glorified waitress, and that there were other jobs that would let one see the world, to boot.
This has nothing at all to do with discrimination becoming a dirty word.
Yes, there were lawsuits about the weigh in's, etc., because they made no sense in relation to what the job actually was: acting as a waitress, and keeping the passengers safe in an emergency. Those rules were forcing seasoned, experienced, valuable flight attendants to retire, in favor of someone younger and less able to do the job. Nothing in the current law stops the airline from hiring the youngest, prettiest, most personable applicant in the interview. It just stops them from firing her 3 years later for doing nothing worse than gaining 10 pounds or getting older. Oh, and moving up the pay scale: that was the kicker , it probably always had more to do with cheap labor, when the pool of new applicants was plentiful, than customer service. As other posters have pointed out, other changes were happening that made it all old, stale and irrelevant from a business standpoint.
I would much rather know that my flight attendant had the experience to handle a difficult passenger, assist with a medical emergency, or spot a terrorist than have him or her be handsome or pretty.
Not that I don't enjoy a handsome young man attending to me in any situation, of course. Just, it matters more that he can do his job than that I have eye candy.
One of our neighbors has made a very long career of being a flight attendant. She joined back in the day when the job held luster, and still enjoys it. She's got a level head, a ready smile, and a very comforting aura ... but she is no longer young, single or super skinny. Why should she have to move on?
It's not like airlines here ever started hiring older women at entries levels (or that older women ever started applying); it's just that they started to keep the ones they already had.
Perhaps you aren't the only one yearning for the "good ol' days." ABC has a new on it's schedule that should be just up your alley. About young, pretty flight attendants. From back in the days women thought that was the thing to be.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).