Page 3 of 7 [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

07 Dec 2011, 4:34 pm

The Republican primary is a joke. At this point an intelligent conservative candidate would do better bypassing it and running as an independent.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

07 Dec 2011, 4:41 pm

marshall wrote:
The Republican primary is a joke. At this point an intelligent conservative candidate would do better bypassing it and running as an independent.


You're just saying that cause you want to split the opposition vote... I wasn't born yesterday, if you think anyone here that actually knows you would be dumb enough to fall for that, I got news for you, they aren't.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

07 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm

Fnord wrote:
If it came down to Barack Obama and Newt Gingrich, I'd still vote for the trained pig, whether or not it was a candidate.

Which would you choose:

Image
Arnold Ziffle (Green Acres)

Image
Babe (Movie of the same name)

Image
Wilbur (Charlotte's Web)

Image
Swine #22734


I am reasonably certain that Babe is not constitutionally eligible as the character was created in a British novel that was then filmed in Australia.

Given the choice between Arnold Ziffel and Wilbur, I think I have to go for Wilbur. After all, he's some pig!

[edit: further investigation reveals some very sketchy questions about Arnold Ziffel's moral standing. Clearly a transsexual (a character named "Arnold" portrayed by female piglets), he was also an artist ("Porky Picasso") who created scandalous works ("Nude at a Filling Station"), a profligate spendthrift wasting money that he had not yet earned. Worst of all, his relationship with the basset hound Cynthia raises important questions about his sexual orientation.]


_________________
--James


Last edited by visagrunt on 07 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

07 Dec 2011, 4:58 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Another reason why I'm supporting Gingrich is cause the media keeps pushing Mitt Romney, so we know that Obama would really rather run against Romney.


No they don't. They scarcely mention Romney.

But, how would you know, anyway? Does someone on Fox Noise claim that the "media keep pushing Mitt Romney?"



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

07 Dec 2011, 5:04 pm

pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Another reason why I'm supporting Gingrich is cause the media keeps pushing Mitt Romney, so we know that Obama would really rather run against Romney.


No they don't. They scarcely mention Romney.

But, how would you know, anyway? Does someone on Fox Noise claim that the "media keep pushing Mitt Romney?"


*Sigh

The mainstream media attacks everyone that passes Romney in the polls yet leave him alone.

As for certain people here whom would vote for Obama no matter what, there is some new evidence that came out in Fast & Furious

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt182831.html

Read the post, this has turned into something really big.



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

07 Dec 2011, 5:22 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Another reason why I'm supporting Gingrich is cause the media keeps pushing Mitt Romney, so we know that Obama would really rather run against Romney.


No they don't. They scarcely mention Romney.

But, how would you know, anyway? Does someone on Fox Noise claim that the "media keep pushing Mitt Romney?"


*Sigh

The mainstream media attacks everyone that passes Romney in the polls yet leave him alone.
Might be because Romney, for all of his faults, is level-headed, intelligent and credible.

Quote:
As for certain people here whom would vote for Obama no matter what, there is some new evidence that came out in Fast & Furious
Are you still on about that?

Quote:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt182831.html

Read the post, this has turned into something really big.
And the reason nobody takes you seriously on it is that you are openly gleeful about it. You make it obvious that you are willing to resort to outright invention if it gives you something to smear Obama over. You don't seem to realize how disingenuous you make yourself look on this.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

07 Dec 2011, 5:26 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
The Republican primary is a joke. At this point an intelligent conservative candidate would do better bypassing it and running as an independent.


You're just saying that cause you want to split the opposition vote... I wasn't born yesterday, if you think anyone here that actually knows you would be dumb enough to fall for that, I got news for you, they aren't.


Ummm... last I checked Fnord is fairly conservative so I doubt he's going to vote for Obama. If conservatives want to stop Obama they have to get a candidate that someone like Fnord would vote for, a moderate libertarian who isn't a far-right religious nutjob (Bachmann or Perry), policy dunce (Cain), or unlikeable personality (Romney or Gingrich). Just face it, the GOP failed to come up with an electable candidate. At this point maybe Romney can eke out a win, but Gingrich is basically unelectable.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

07 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm

marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
The Republican primary is a joke. At this point an intelligent conservative candidate would do better bypassing it and running as an independent.


You're just saying that cause you want to split the opposition vote... I wasn't born yesterday, if you think anyone here that actually knows you would be dumb enough to fall for that, I got news for you, they aren't.


Ummm... last I checked Fnord is fairly conservative so I doubt he's going to vote for Obama. If conservatives want to stop Obama they have to get a candidate that someone like Fnord would vote for, a moderate libertarian who isn't a far-right religious nutjob (Bachmann or Perry), policy dunce (Cain), or unlikeable personality (Romney or Gingrich). Just face it, the GOP failed to come up with an electable candidate. At this point maybe Romney can eke out a win, but Gingrich is basically unelectable.


Actually, I think Gingrich is a very good candidate and would make a good President. I think the way this President is going, we could nominate a Chihuahua and win.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

07 Dec 2011, 5:33 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Another reason why I'm supporting Gingrich is cause the media keeps pushing Mitt Romney, so we know that Obama would really rather run against Romney.


No they don't. They scarcely mention Romney.

But, how would you know, anyway? Does someone on Fox Noise claim that the "media keep pushing Mitt Romney?"


*Sigh

The mainstream media attacks everyone that passes Romney in the polls yet leave him alone.



Again, how would you know?



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

07 Dec 2011, 5:35 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Actually, I think Gingrich is a very good candidate and would make a good President. I think the way this President is going, we could nominate a Chihuahua and win.


The polling doesn't appear to support you.

If fundraising is a measure--how can it not be--then your boy (and I choose the gender exclusive deliberately) is going to have a major uphill battle to fight.


_________________
--James


MarsCoban
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 175
Location: Colorado

07 Dec 2011, 5:36 pm

Just the other night, Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz were attacking Romney for his poor interview with Fox.


_________________
I try to prevent my ego from obscuring my greatness.


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

07 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm

visagrunt wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Actually, I think Gingrich is a very good candidate and would make a good President. I think the way this President is going, we could nominate a Chihuahua and win.


The polling doesn't appear to support you.

If fundraising is a measure--how can it not be--then your boy (and I choose the gender exclusive deliberately) is going to have a major uphill battle to fight.


However, I think the normal campaign stuff isn't as effective due to the extraordinary number of debates that have happened.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

07 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm

MarsCoban wrote:
Just the other night, Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz were attacking Romney for his poor interview with Fox.


Are Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz on Fox? Or a part of the "Mainstream?"

Was Fox attacking Romney?



MarsCoban
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 175
Location: Colorado

07 Dec 2011, 5:40 pm

pandabear wrote:
MarsCoban wrote:
Just the other night, Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz were attacking Romney for his poor interview with Fox.


Are Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz on Fox? Or a part of the "Mainstream?"

Was Fox attacking Romney?

No, they're part of MSNBC. The Fox interviewer was asking Romney how voters could trust him with his record of flip-flopping, and Romney basically said they had bad information and that he never did flip-flop.


_________________
I try to prevent my ego from obscuring my greatness.


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

07 Dec 2011, 5:40 pm

pandabear wrote:
MarsCoban wrote:
Just the other night, Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz were attacking Romney for his poor interview with Fox.


Are Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz on Fox? Or a part of the "Mainstream?"

Was Fox attacking Romney?


Source plz?

I wouldn't doubt that they went after Romney on that, because if they hadn't it would have been to blatent as to who the Democrats want to be the Republican nominee.



MarsCoban
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 175
Location: Colorado

07 Dec 2011, 5:42 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
MarsCoban wrote:
Just the other night, Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz were attacking Romney for his poor interview with Fox.


Are Chris Mathews and Ed Schulz on Fox? Or a part of the "Mainstream?"

Was Fox attacking Romney?


Source plz?

I wouldn't doubt that they went after Romney on that, because if they hadn't it would have been to blatent as to who the Democrats want to be the Republican nominee.

Look it up yourself.

Everything the left does is a conspiracy to you, isn't it?

Funny thing is, of course the left is going to conspire against the right, just as the right is going to conspire against the left, because of course each party wants to win, which is what is wrong. For the most part, they don't care about being right, they just care about winning.


_________________
I try to prevent my ego from obscuring my greatness.